Cargando…
Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system
INTRODUCTION: Numerical classification systems for the internal carotid artery (ICA) are available, but modifications have added confusion to the numerical systems. Furthermore, previous classifications may not be applicable uniformly to microsurgical and endoscopic procedures. The purpose of this s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27630478 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.188412 |
_version_ | 1782449268079984640 |
---|---|
author | Abdulrauf, Saleem I Ashour, Ahmed M Marvin, Eric Coppens, Jeroen Kang, Brian Hsieh, Tze Yu Yeh Nery, Breno Penanes, Juan R Alsahlawi, Aysha K Moore, Shawn Al-Shaar, Hussam Abou Kemp, Joanna Chawla, Kanika Sujijantarat, Nanthiya Najeeb, Alaa Parkar, Nadeem Shetty, Vilaas Vafaie, Tina Antisdel, Jastin Mikulec, Tony A Edgell, Randall Lebovitz, Jonathan Pierson, Matt Pires de Aguiar, Paulo Henrique Buchanan, Paula Di Cosola, Angela Stevens, George |
author_facet | Abdulrauf, Saleem I Ashour, Ahmed M Marvin, Eric Coppens, Jeroen Kang, Brian Hsieh, Tze Yu Yeh Nery, Breno Penanes, Juan R Alsahlawi, Aysha K Moore, Shawn Al-Shaar, Hussam Abou Kemp, Joanna Chawla, Kanika Sujijantarat, Nanthiya Najeeb, Alaa Parkar, Nadeem Shetty, Vilaas Vafaie, Tina Antisdel, Jastin Mikulec, Tony A Edgell, Randall Lebovitz, Jonathan Pierson, Matt Pires de Aguiar, Paulo Henrique Buchanan, Paula Di Cosola, Angela Stevens, George |
author_sort | Abdulrauf, Saleem I |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Numerical classification systems for the internal carotid artery (ICA) are available, but modifications have added confusion to the numerical systems. Furthermore, previous classifications may not be applicable uniformly to microsurgical and endoscopic procedures. The purpose of this study was to develop a clinically useful classification system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed cadaver dissections of the ICA in 5 heads (10 sides) and evaluated 648 internal carotid arteries with computed tomography angiography. We identified specific anatomic landmarks to define the beginning and end of each ICA segment. RESULTS: The ICA was classified into eight segments based on the cadaver and imaging findings: (1) Cervical segment; (2) cochlear segment (ascending segment of the ICA in the temporal bone) (relation of the start of this segment to the base of the styloid process: Above, 425 sides [80%]; below, 2 sides [0.4%]; at same level, 107 sides [20%]; P < 0.0001) (relation of cochlea to ICA: Posterior, 501 sides [85%]; posteromedial, 84 sides [14%]; P < 0.0001); (3) petrous segment (horizontal segment of ICA in the temporal bone) starting at the crossing of the eustachian tube superolateral to the ICA turn in all 10 samples; (4) Gasserian-Clival segment (ascending segment of ICA in the cavernous sinus) starting at the petrolingual ligament (PLL) (relation to vidian canal on imaging: At same level, 360 sides [63%]; below, 154 sides [27%]; above, 53 sides [9%]; P < 0.0001); in this segment, the ICA projected medially toward the clivus in 275 sides (52%) or parallel to the clivus with no deviation in 256 sides (48%; P < 0.0001); (5) sellar segment (medial loop of ICA in the cavernous sinus) starting at the takeoff of the meningeal hypophyseal trunk (ICA was medial into the sella in 271 cases [46%], lateral without touching the sella in 127 cases [23%], and abutting the sella in 182 cases [31%]; P < 0.0001); (6) sphenoid segment (lateral loop of ICA within the cavernous sinus) starting at the crossing of the fourth cranial nerve on the lateral aspect of the cavernous ICA and located directly lateral to the sphenoid sinus; (7) ring segment (ICA between the 2 dural rings) starting at the crossing of the third cranial nerve on the lateral aspect of the ICA; (8) cisternal segment starting at the distal dural ring. CONCLUSIONS: The classification may be applied uniformly to all skull base surgical approaches including lateral microsurgical and ventral endoscopic approaches, obviating the need for 2 separate classification systems. The classification allows extrapolation of relevant clinical information because each named segment may indicate potential surgical risk to specific structures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4994148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49941482016-09-14 Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system Abdulrauf, Saleem I Ashour, Ahmed M Marvin, Eric Coppens, Jeroen Kang, Brian Hsieh, Tze Yu Yeh Nery, Breno Penanes, Juan R Alsahlawi, Aysha K Moore, Shawn Al-Shaar, Hussam Abou Kemp, Joanna Chawla, Kanika Sujijantarat, Nanthiya Najeeb, Alaa Parkar, Nadeem Shetty, Vilaas Vafaie, Tina Antisdel, Jastin Mikulec, Tony A Edgell, Randall Lebovitz, Jonathan Pierson, Matt Pires de Aguiar, Paulo Henrique Buchanan, Paula Di Cosola, Angela Stevens, George J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article INTRODUCTION: Numerical classification systems for the internal carotid artery (ICA) are available, but modifications have added confusion to the numerical systems. Furthermore, previous classifications may not be applicable uniformly to microsurgical and endoscopic procedures. The purpose of this study was to develop a clinically useful classification system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed cadaver dissections of the ICA in 5 heads (10 sides) and evaluated 648 internal carotid arteries with computed tomography angiography. We identified specific anatomic landmarks to define the beginning and end of each ICA segment. RESULTS: The ICA was classified into eight segments based on the cadaver and imaging findings: (1) Cervical segment; (2) cochlear segment (ascending segment of the ICA in the temporal bone) (relation of the start of this segment to the base of the styloid process: Above, 425 sides [80%]; below, 2 sides [0.4%]; at same level, 107 sides [20%]; P < 0.0001) (relation of cochlea to ICA: Posterior, 501 sides [85%]; posteromedial, 84 sides [14%]; P < 0.0001); (3) petrous segment (horizontal segment of ICA in the temporal bone) starting at the crossing of the eustachian tube superolateral to the ICA turn in all 10 samples; (4) Gasserian-Clival segment (ascending segment of ICA in the cavernous sinus) starting at the petrolingual ligament (PLL) (relation to vidian canal on imaging: At same level, 360 sides [63%]; below, 154 sides [27%]; above, 53 sides [9%]; P < 0.0001); in this segment, the ICA projected medially toward the clivus in 275 sides (52%) or parallel to the clivus with no deviation in 256 sides (48%; P < 0.0001); (5) sellar segment (medial loop of ICA in the cavernous sinus) starting at the takeoff of the meningeal hypophyseal trunk (ICA was medial into the sella in 271 cases [46%], lateral without touching the sella in 127 cases [23%], and abutting the sella in 182 cases [31%]; P < 0.0001); (6) sphenoid segment (lateral loop of ICA within the cavernous sinus) starting at the crossing of the fourth cranial nerve on the lateral aspect of the cavernous ICA and located directly lateral to the sphenoid sinus; (7) ring segment (ICA between the 2 dural rings) starting at the crossing of the third cranial nerve on the lateral aspect of the ICA; (8) cisternal segment starting at the distal dural ring. CONCLUSIONS: The classification may be applied uniformly to all skull base surgical approaches including lateral microsurgical and ventral endoscopic approaches, obviating the need for 2 separate classification systems. The classification allows extrapolation of relevant clinical information because each named segment may indicate potential surgical risk to specific structures. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4994148/ /pubmed/27630478 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.188412 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Abdulrauf, Saleem I Ashour, Ahmed M Marvin, Eric Coppens, Jeroen Kang, Brian Hsieh, Tze Yu Yeh Nery, Breno Penanes, Juan R Alsahlawi, Aysha K Moore, Shawn Al-Shaar, Hussam Abou Kemp, Joanna Chawla, Kanika Sujijantarat, Nanthiya Najeeb, Alaa Parkar, Nadeem Shetty, Vilaas Vafaie, Tina Antisdel, Jastin Mikulec, Tony A Edgell, Randall Lebovitz, Jonathan Pierson, Matt Pires de Aguiar, Paulo Henrique Buchanan, Paula Di Cosola, Angela Stevens, George Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system |
title | Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system |
title_full | Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system |
title_fullStr | Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system |
title_full_unstemmed | Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system |
title_short | Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system |
title_sort | proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27630478 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.188412 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdulraufsaleemi proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT ashourahmedm proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT marvineric proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT coppensjeroen proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT kangbrian proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT hsiehtzeyuyeh proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT nerybreno proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT penanesjuanr proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT alsahlawiayshak proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT mooreshawn proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT alshaarhussamabou proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT kempjoanna proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT chawlakanika proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT sujijantaratnanthiya proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT najeebalaa proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT parkarnadeem proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT shettyvilaas proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT vafaietina proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT antisdeljastin proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT mikulectonya proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT edgellrandall proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT lebovitzjonathan proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT piersonmatt proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT piresdeaguiarpaulohenrique proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT buchananpaula proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT dicosolaangela proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem AT stevensgeorge proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem |