Cargando…

Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system

INTRODUCTION: Numerical classification systems for the internal carotid artery (ICA) are available, but modifications have added confusion to the numerical systems. Furthermore, previous classifications may not be applicable uniformly to microsurgical and endoscopic procedures. The purpose of this s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdulrauf, Saleem I, Ashour, Ahmed M, Marvin, Eric, Coppens, Jeroen, Kang, Brian, Hsieh, Tze Yu Yeh, Nery, Breno, Penanes, Juan R, Alsahlawi, Aysha K, Moore, Shawn, Al-Shaar, Hussam Abou, Kemp, Joanna, Chawla, Kanika, Sujijantarat, Nanthiya, Najeeb, Alaa, Parkar, Nadeem, Shetty, Vilaas, Vafaie, Tina, Antisdel, Jastin, Mikulec, Tony A, Edgell, Randall, Lebovitz, Jonathan, Pierson, Matt, Pires de Aguiar, Paulo Henrique, Buchanan, Paula, Di Cosola, Angela, Stevens, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27630478
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.188412
_version_ 1782449268079984640
author Abdulrauf, Saleem I
Ashour, Ahmed M
Marvin, Eric
Coppens, Jeroen
Kang, Brian
Hsieh, Tze Yu Yeh
Nery, Breno
Penanes, Juan R
Alsahlawi, Aysha K
Moore, Shawn
Al-Shaar, Hussam Abou
Kemp, Joanna
Chawla, Kanika
Sujijantarat, Nanthiya
Najeeb, Alaa
Parkar, Nadeem
Shetty, Vilaas
Vafaie, Tina
Antisdel, Jastin
Mikulec, Tony A
Edgell, Randall
Lebovitz, Jonathan
Pierson, Matt
Pires de Aguiar, Paulo Henrique
Buchanan, Paula
Di Cosola, Angela
Stevens, George
author_facet Abdulrauf, Saleem I
Ashour, Ahmed M
Marvin, Eric
Coppens, Jeroen
Kang, Brian
Hsieh, Tze Yu Yeh
Nery, Breno
Penanes, Juan R
Alsahlawi, Aysha K
Moore, Shawn
Al-Shaar, Hussam Abou
Kemp, Joanna
Chawla, Kanika
Sujijantarat, Nanthiya
Najeeb, Alaa
Parkar, Nadeem
Shetty, Vilaas
Vafaie, Tina
Antisdel, Jastin
Mikulec, Tony A
Edgell, Randall
Lebovitz, Jonathan
Pierson, Matt
Pires de Aguiar, Paulo Henrique
Buchanan, Paula
Di Cosola, Angela
Stevens, George
author_sort Abdulrauf, Saleem I
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Numerical classification systems for the internal carotid artery (ICA) are available, but modifications have added confusion to the numerical systems. Furthermore, previous classifications may not be applicable uniformly to microsurgical and endoscopic procedures. The purpose of this study was to develop a clinically useful classification system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed cadaver dissections of the ICA in 5 heads (10 sides) and evaluated 648 internal carotid arteries with computed tomography angiography. We identified specific anatomic landmarks to define the beginning and end of each ICA segment. RESULTS: The ICA was classified into eight segments based on the cadaver and imaging findings: (1) Cervical segment; (2) cochlear segment (ascending segment of the ICA in the temporal bone) (relation of the start of this segment to the base of the styloid process: Above, 425 sides [80%]; below, 2 sides [0.4%]; at same level, 107 sides [20%]; P < 0.0001) (relation of cochlea to ICA: Posterior, 501 sides [85%]; posteromedial, 84 sides [14%]; P < 0.0001); (3) petrous segment (horizontal segment of ICA in the temporal bone) starting at the crossing of the eustachian tube superolateral to the ICA turn in all 10 samples; (4) Gasserian-Clival segment (ascending segment of ICA in the cavernous sinus) starting at the petrolingual ligament (PLL) (relation to vidian canal on imaging: At same level, 360 sides [63%]; below, 154 sides [27%]; above, 53 sides [9%]; P < 0.0001); in this segment, the ICA projected medially toward the clivus in 275 sides (52%) or parallel to the clivus with no deviation in 256 sides (48%; P < 0.0001); (5) sellar segment (medial loop of ICA in the cavernous sinus) starting at the takeoff of the meningeal hypophyseal trunk (ICA was medial into the sella in 271 cases [46%], lateral without touching the sella in 127 cases [23%], and abutting the sella in 182 cases [31%]; P < 0.0001); (6) sphenoid segment (lateral loop of ICA within the cavernous sinus) starting at the crossing of the fourth cranial nerve on the lateral aspect of the cavernous ICA and located directly lateral to the sphenoid sinus; (7) ring segment (ICA between the 2 dural rings) starting at the crossing of the third cranial nerve on the lateral aspect of the ICA; (8) cisternal segment starting at the distal dural ring. CONCLUSIONS: The classification may be applied uniformly to all skull base surgical approaches including lateral microsurgical and ventral endoscopic approaches, obviating the need for 2 separate classification systems. The classification allows extrapolation of relevant clinical information because each named segment may indicate potential surgical risk to specific structures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4994148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49941482016-09-14 Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system Abdulrauf, Saleem I Ashour, Ahmed M Marvin, Eric Coppens, Jeroen Kang, Brian Hsieh, Tze Yu Yeh Nery, Breno Penanes, Juan R Alsahlawi, Aysha K Moore, Shawn Al-Shaar, Hussam Abou Kemp, Joanna Chawla, Kanika Sujijantarat, Nanthiya Najeeb, Alaa Parkar, Nadeem Shetty, Vilaas Vafaie, Tina Antisdel, Jastin Mikulec, Tony A Edgell, Randall Lebovitz, Jonathan Pierson, Matt Pires de Aguiar, Paulo Henrique Buchanan, Paula Di Cosola, Angela Stevens, George J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article INTRODUCTION: Numerical classification systems for the internal carotid artery (ICA) are available, but modifications have added confusion to the numerical systems. Furthermore, previous classifications may not be applicable uniformly to microsurgical and endoscopic procedures. The purpose of this study was to develop a clinically useful classification system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed cadaver dissections of the ICA in 5 heads (10 sides) and evaluated 648 internal carotid arteries with computed tomography angiography. We identified specific anatomic landmarks to define the beginning and end of each ICA segment. RESULTS: The ICA was classified into eight segments based on the cadaver and imaging findings: (1) Cervical segment; (2) cochlear segment (ascending segment of the ICA in the temporal bone) (relation of the start of this segment to the base of the styloid process: Above, 425 sides [80%]; below, 2 sides [0.4%]; at same level, 107 sides [20%]; P < 0.0001) (relation of cochlea to ICA: Posterior, 501 sides [85%]; posteromedial, 84 sides [14%]; P < 0.0001); (3) petrous segment (horizontal segment of ICA in the temporal bone) starting at the crossing of the eustachian tube superolateral to the ICA turn in all 10 samples; (4) Gasserian-Clival segment (ascending segment of ICA in the cavernous sinus) starting at the petrolingual ligament (PLL) (relation to vidian canal on imaging: At same level, 360 sides [63%]; below, 154 sides [27%]; above, 53 sides [9%]; P < 0.0001); in this segment, the ICA projected medially toward the clivus in 275 sides (52%) or parallel to the clivus with no deviation in 256 sides (48%; P < 0.0001); (5) sellar segment (medial loop of ICA in the cavernous sinus) starting at the takeoff of the meningeal hypophyseal trunk (ICA was medial into the sella in 271 cases [46%], lateral without touching the sella in 127 cases [23%], and abutting the sella in 182 cases [31%]; P < 0.0001); (6) sphenoid segment (lateral loop of ICA within the cavernous sinus) starting at the crossing of the fourth cranial nerve on the lateral aspect of the cavernous ICA and located directly lateral to the sphenoid sinus; (7) ring segment (ICA between the 2 dural rings) starting at the crossing of the third cranial nerve on the lateral aspect of the ICA; (8) cisternal segment starting at the distal dural ring. CONCLUSIONS: The classification may be applied uniformly to all skull base surgical approaches including lateral microsurgical and ventral endoscopic approaches, obviating the need for 2 separate classification systems. The classification allows extrapolation of relevant clinical information because each named segment may indicate potential surgical risk to specific structures. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4994148/ /pubmed/27630478 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.188412 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abdulrauf, Saleem I
Ashour, Ahmed M
Marvin, Eric
Coppens, Jeroen
Kang, Brian
Hsieh, Tze Yu Yeh
Nery, Breno
Penanes, Juan R
Alsahlawi, Aysha K
Moore, Shawn
Al-Shaar, Hussam Abou
Kemp, Joanna
Chawla, Kanika
Sujijantarat, Nanthiya
Najeeb, Alaa
Parkar, Nadeem
Shetty, Vilaas
Vafaie, Tina
Antisdel, Jastin
Mikulec, Tony A
Edgell, Randall
Lebovitz, Jonathan
Pierson, Matt
Pires de Aguiar, Paulo Henrique
Buchanan, Paula
Di Cosola, Angela
Stevens, George
Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system
title Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system
title_full Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system
title_fullStr Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system
title_full_unstemmed Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system
title_short Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system
title_sort proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27630478
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.188412
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulraufsaleemi proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT ashourahmedm proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT marvineric proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT coppensjeroen proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT kangbrian proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT hsiehtzeyuyeh proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT nerybreno proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT penanesjuanr proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT alsahlawiayshak proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT mooreshawn proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT alshaarhussamabou proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT kempjoanna proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT chawlakanika proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT sujijantaratnanthiya proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT najeebalaa proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT parkarnadeem proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT shettyvilaas proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT vafaietina proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT antisdeljastin proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT mikulectonya proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT edgellrandall proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT lebovitzjonathan proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT piersonmatt proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT piresdeaguiarpaulohenrique proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT buchananpaula proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT dicosolaangela proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem
AT stevensgeorge proposedclinicalinternalcarotidarteryclassificationsystem