Cargando…

Prospective evaluation of an automated method to identify patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in the emergency department

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is an often-fatal syndrome resulting from severe infection. Rapid identification and treatment are critical for septic patients. We therefore developed a probabilistic model to identify septic patients in the emergency department (ED). We aimed to produce a model that identifies 8...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Samuel M., Jones, Jason, Kuttler, Kathryn Gibb, Keddington, Roger K., Allen, Todd L., Haug, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27549755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-016-0095-0
_version_ 1782449292463570944
author Brown, Samuel M.
Jones, Jason
Kuttler, Kathryn Gibb
Keddington, Roger K.
Allen, Todd L.
Haug, Peter
author_facet Brown, Samuel M.
Jones, Jason
Kuttler, Kathryn Gibb
Keddington, Roger K.
Allen, Todd L.
Haug, Peter
author_sort Brown, Samuel M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sepsis is an often-fatal syndrome resulting from severe infection. Rapid identification and treatment are critical for septic patients. We therefore developed a probabilistic model to identify septic patients in the emergency department (ED). We aimed to produce a model that identifies 80 % of sepsis patients, with no more than 15 false positive alerts per day, within one hour of ED admission, using routine clinical data. METHODS: We developed the model using retrospective data for 132,748 ED encounters (549 septic), with manual chart review to confirm cases of severe sepsis or septic shock from January 2006 through December 2008. A naïve Bayes model was used to select model features, starting with clinician-proposed candidate variables, which were then used to calculate the probability of sepsis. We evaluated the accuracy of the resulting model in 93,733 ED encounters from April 2009 through June 2010. RESULTS: The final model included mean blood pressure, temperature, age, heart rate, and white blood cell count. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the continuous predictor model was 0.953. The binary alert achieved 76.4 % sensitivity with a false positive rate of 4.7 %. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a probabilistic model to identify sepsis early in an ED encounter. Despite changes in process, organizational focus, and the H1N1 influenza pandemic, our model performed adequately in our validation cohort, suggesting that it will be generalizable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4994262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49942622016-08-24 Prospective evaluation of an automated method to identify patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in the emergency department Brown, Samuel M. Jones, Jason Kuttler, Kathryn Gibb Keddington, Roger K. Allen, Todd L. Haug, Peter BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Sepsis is an often-fatal syndrome resulting from severe infection. Rapid identification and treatment are critical for septic patients. We therefore developed a probabilistic model to identify septic patients in the emergency department (ED). We aimed to produce a model that identifies 80 % of sepsis patients, with no more than 15 false positive alerts per day, within one hour of ED admission, using routine clinical data. METHODS: We developed the model using retrospective data for 132,748 ED encounters (549 septic), with manual chart review to confirm cases of severe sepsis or septic shock from January 2006 through December 2008. A naïve Bayes model was used to select model features, starting with clinician-proposed candidate variables, which were then used to calculate the probability of sepsis. We evaluated the accuracy of the resulting model in 93,733 ED encounters from April 2009 through June 2010. RESULTS: The final model included mean blood pressure, temperature, age, heart rate, and white blood cell count. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the continuous predictor model was 0.953. The binary alert achieved 76.4 % sensitivity with a false positive rate of 4.7 %. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a probabilistic model to identify sepsis early in an ED encounter. Despite changes in process, organizational focus, and the H1N1 influenza pandemic, our model performed adequately in our validation cohort, suggesting that it will be generalizable. BioMed Central 2016-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4994262/ /pubmed/27549755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-016-0095-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brown, Samuel M.
Jones, Jason
Kuttler, Kathryn Gibb
Keddington, Roger K.
Allen, Todd L.
Haug, Peter
Prospective evaluation of an automated method to identify patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in the emergency department
title Prospective evaluation of an automated method to identify patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in the emergency department
title_full Prospective evaluation of an automated method to identify patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in the emergency department
title_fullStr Prospective evaluation of an automated method to identify patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Prospective evaluation of an automated method to identify patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in the emergency department
title_short Prospective evaluation of an automated method to identify patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in the emergency department
title_sort prospective evaluation of an automated method to identify patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in the emergency department
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27549755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-016-0095-0
work_keys_str_mv AT brownsamuelm prospectiveevaluationofanautomatedmethodtoidentifypatientswithseveresepsisorsepticshockintheemergencydepartment
AT jonesjason prospectiveevaluationofanautomatedmethodtoidentifypatientswithseveresepsisorsepticshockintheemergencydepartment
AT kuttlerkathryngibb prospectiveevaluationofanautomatedmethodtoidentifypatientswithseveresepsisorsepticshockintheemergencydepartment
AT keddingtonrogerk prospectiveevaluationofanautomatedmethodtoidentifypatientswithseveresepsisorsepticshockintheemergencydepartment
AT allentoddl prospectiveevaluationofanautomatedmethodtoidentifypatientswithseveresepsisorsepticshockintheemergencydepartment
AT haugpeter prospectiveevaluationofanautomatedmethodtoidentifypatientswithseveresepsisorsepticshockintheemergencydepartment