Cargando…

Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk?

BACKGROUND: It has been frequently argued that tissues evolved to suppress the accumulation of growth enhancing cancer inducing mutations. A prominent example is the hierarchical structure of tissues with high cell turnover, where a small number of tissue specific stem cells produces a large number...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hindersin, Laura, Werner, Benjamin, Dingli, David, Traulsen, Arne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27549612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-016-0140-7
_version_ 1782449301904949248
author Hindersin, Laura
Werner, Benjamin
Dingli, David
Traulsen, Arne
author_facet Hindersin, Laura
Werner, Benjamin
Dingli, David
Traulsen, Arne
author_sort Hindersin, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been frequently argued that tissues evolved to suppress the accumulation of growth enhancing cancer inducing mutations. A prominent example is the hierarchical structure of tissues with high cell turnover, where a small number of tissue specific stem cells produces a large number of specialized progeny during multiple differentiation steps. Another well known mechanism is the spatial organization of stem cell populations and it is thought that this organization suppresses fitness enhancing mutations. However, in small populations the suppression of advantageous mutations typically also implies an increased accumulation of deleterious mutations. Thus, it becomes an important question whether the suppression of potentially few advantageous mutations outweighs the combined effects of many deleterious mutations. RESULTS: We argue that the distribution of mutant fitness effects, e.g. the probability to hit a strong driver compared to many deleterious mutations, is crucial for the optimal organization of a cancer suppressing tissue architecture and should be taken into account in arguments for the evolution of such tissues. CONCLUSION: We show that for systems that are composed of few cells reflecting the typical organization of a stem cell niche, amplification or suppression of selection can arise from subtle changes in the architecture. Moreover, we discuss special tissue structures that can suppress most types of non-neutral mutations simultaneously. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Benjamin Allen, Andreas Deutsch and Ignacio Rodriguez-Brenes. For the full reviews, please go to the Reviewers’ comments section.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4994303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49943032016-08-24 Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk? Hindersin, Laura Werner, Benjamin Dingli, David Traulsen, Arne Biol Direct Research BACKGROUND: It has been frequently argued that tissues evolved to suppress the accumulation of growth enhancing cancer inducing mutations. A prominent example is the hierarchical structure of tissues with high cell turnover, where a small number of tissue specific stem cells produces a large number of specialized progeny during multiple differentiation steps. Another well known mechanism is the spatial organization of stem cell populations and it is thought that this organization suppresses fitness enhancing mutations. However, in small populations the suppression of advantageous mutations typically also implies an increased accumulation of deleterious mutations. Thus, it becomes an important question whether the suppression of potentially few advantageous mutations outweighs the combined effects of many deleterious mutations. RESULTS: We argue that the distribution of mutant fitness effects, e.g. the probability to hit a strong driver compared to many deleterious mutations, is crucial for the optimal organization of a cancer suppressing tissue architecture and should be taken into account in arguments for the evolution of such tissues. CONCLUSION: We show that for systems that are composed of few cells reflecting the typical organization of a stem cell niche, amplification or suppression of selection can arise from subtle changes in the architecture. Moreover, we discuss special tissue structures that can suppress most types of non-neutral mutations simultaneously. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Benjamin Allen, Andreas Deutsch and Ignacio Rodriguez-Brenes. For the full reviews, please go to the Reviewers’ comments section. BioMed Central 2016-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4994303/ /pubmed/27549612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-016-0140-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hindersin, Laura
Werner, Benjamin
Dingli, David
Traulsen, Arne
Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk?
title Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk?
title_full Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk?
title_fullStr Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk?
title_full_unstemmed Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk?
title_short Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk?
title_sort should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27549612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-016-0140-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hindersinlaura shouldtissuestructuresuppressoramplifyselectiontominimizecancerrisk
AT wernerbenjamin shouldtissuestructuresuppressoramplifyselectiontominimizecancerrisk
AT dinglidavid shouldtissuestructuresuppressoramplifyselectiontominimizecancerrisk
AT traulsenarne shouldtissuestructuresuppressoramplifyselectiontominimizecancerrisk