Cargando…
Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk?
BACKGROUND: It has been frequently argued that tissues evolved to suppress the accumulation of growth enhancing cancer inducing mutations. A prominent example is the hierarchical structure of tissues with high cell turnover, where a small number of tissue specific stem cells produces a large number...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27549612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-016-0140-7 |
_version_ | 1782449301904949248 |
---|---|
author | Hindersin, Laura Werner, Benjamin Dingli, David Traulsen, Arne |
author_facet | Hindersin, Laura Werner, Benjamin Dingli, David Traulsen, Arne |
author_sort | Hindersin, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It has been frequently argued that tissues evolved to suppress the accumulation of growth enhancing cancer inducing mutations. A prominent example is the hierarchical structure of tissues with high cell turnover, where a small number of tissue specific stem cells produces a large number of specialized progeny during multiple differentiation steps. Another well known mechanism is the spatial organization of stem cell populations and it is thought that this organization suppresses fitness enhancing mutations. However, in small populations the suppression of advantageous mutations typically also implies an increased accumulation of deleterious mutations. Thus, it becomes an important question whether the suppression of potentially few advantageous mutations outweighs the combined effects of many deleterious mutations. RESULTS: We argue that the distribution of mutant fitness effects, e.g. the probability to hit a strong driver compared to many deleterious mutations, is crucial for the optimal organization of a cancer suppressing tissue architecture and should be taken into account in arguments for the evolution of such tissues. CONCLUSION: We show that for systems that are composed of few cells reflecting the typical organization of a stem cell niche, amplification or suppression of selection can arise from subtle changes in the architecture. Moreover, we discuss special tissue structures that can suppress most types of non-neutral mutations simultaneously. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Benjamin Allen, Andreas Deutsch and Ignacio Rodriguez-Brenes. For the full reviews, please go to the Reviewers’ comments section. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4994303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49943032016-08-24 Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk? Hindersin, Laura Werner, Benjamin Dingli, David Traulsen, Arne Biol Direct Research BACKGROUND: It has been frequently argued that tissues evolved to suppress the accumulation of growth enhancing cancer inducing mutations. A prominent example is the hierarchical structure of tissues with high cell turnover, where a small number of tissue specific stem cells produces a large number of specialized progeny during multiple differentiation steps. Another well known mechanism is the spatial organization of stem cell populations and it is thought that this organization suppresses fitness enhancing mutations. However, in small populations the suppression of advantageous mutations typically also implies an increased accumulation of deleterious mutations. Thus, it becomes an important question whether the suppression of potentially few advantageous mutations outweighs the combined effects of many deleterious mutations. RESULTS: We argue that the distribution of mutant fitness effects, e.g. the probability to hit a strong driver compared to many deleterious mutations, is crucial for the optimal organization of a cancer suppressing tissue architecture and should be taken into account in arguments for the evolution of such tissues. CONCLUSION: We show that for systems that are composed of few cells reflecting the typical organization of a stem cell niche, amplification or suppression of selection can arise from subtle changes in the architecture. Moreover, we discuss special tissue structures that can suppress most types of non-neutral mutations simultaneously. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Benjamin Allen, Andreas Deutsch and Ignacio Rodriguez-Brenes. For the full reviews, please go to the Reviewers’ comments section. BioMed Central 2016-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4994303/ /pubmed/27549612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-016-0140-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hindersin, Laura Werner, Benjamin Dingli, David Traulsen, Arne Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk? |
title | Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk? |
title_full | Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk? |
title_fullStr | Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk? |
title_full_unstemmed | Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk? |
title_short | Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk? |
title_sort | should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27549612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-016-0140-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hindersinlaura shouldtissuestructuresuppressoramplifyselectiontominimizecancerrisk AT wernerbenjamin shouldtissuestructuresuppressoramplifyselectiontominimizecancerrisk AT dinglidavid shouldtissuestructuresuppressoramplifyselectiontominimizecancerrisk AT traulsenarne shouldtissuestructuresuppressoramplifyselectiontominimizecancerrisk |