Cargando…

Prognostic value of new left atrial volume index severity partition cutoffs after cardiac rehabilitation program in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed that left atrial enlargement is an independent marker of adverse outcomes in both primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention. However, no data are available on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing valve surgery and/or coronary artery by-pass graft (CABG)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lazzeroni, Davide, Gaibazzi, Nicola, Bini, Matteo, Bussolati, Giacomo, Camaiora, Umberto, Cassi, Roberto, Geroldi, Simone, Ugolotti, Pietro Tito, Brambilla, Lorenzo, Brambilla, Valerio, Castiglioni, Paolo, Coruzzi, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27552988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-016-0077-0
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed that left atrial enlargement is an independent marker of adverse outcomes in both primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention. However, no data are available on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing valve surgery and/or coronary artery by-pass graft (CABG) surgery. Aim of the study was to evaluate long-term prognostic role of left atrial volume index (LAVi) after cardiac surgery, using the cutoff values recently proposed by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and American Society of Echocardiography. METHODS: We created a retrospective registry of 1703 consecutive patients who underwent cardiovascular rehabilitation program after cardiac surgery, including CABG, valve surgery and valve + CABG surgery. LAVi was calculated as ratio of left atrium volume to body surface area, in ml/m(2) at discharge; 563 patients with available LAVi data were included in the study. RESULTS: In the whole population LAVi was 36 ± 14 ml/m(2) (mean ± SD) and the follow-up time was 5 ± 1.5 years. Increased LAVi (>34 ml/m(2)) predicted major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) (HR = 2.1; CI95 %: 1.4–3.1; p < 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 2.2; CI95 %: 1.0–4.5; p = 0.032). An increased LAVi remained MACCEs predictor after adjustement for age, gender, diabetes, atrial fibrillation at discharge, echocardiographic E/A ratio and left ventricular ejection fraction (HR = 1.8; CI95 %: 1.0–3.0; p = 0.036). When the study population was split according to increasing LAVi values, left atrium enlargement resulted a predictor of progressively worse adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: LAVi is a predictor of long-term adverse cardiovascular outcome after cardiac surgery, even after correction for main clinical and echocardiographic variables. The recently recommended LAVi severity cutoffs appear adequate to effectively stratify outcome in patients undergoing rehabilitation after cardiac surgery.