Cargando…

Factors Predicting Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Failure

BACKGROUND: Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is performed to improve symptoms and function in patients with a meniscal-deficient compartment of the knee. Numerous studies have shown a consistent improvement in patient-reported outcomes, but high failure rates have been reported by some studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parkinson, Ben, Smith, Nicholas, Asplin, Laura, Thompson, Peter, Spalding, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
24
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27583257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116663185
_version_ 1782449322815651840
author Parkinson, Ben
Smith, Nicholas
Asplin, Laura
Thompson, Peter
Spalding, Tim
author_facet Parkinson, Ben
Smith, Nicholas
Asplin, Laura
Thompson, Peter
Spalding, Tim
author_sort Parkinson, Ben
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is performed to improve symptoms and function in patients with a meniscal-deficient compartment of the knee. Numerous studies have shown a consistent improvement in patient-reported outcomes, but high failure rates have been reported by some studies. The typical patients undergoing MAT often have multiple other pathologies that require treatment at the time of surgery. The factors that predict failure of a meniscal allograft within this complex patient group are not clearly defined. PURPOSE: To determine predictors of MAT failure in a large series to refine the indications for surgery and better inform future patients. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: All patients undergoing MAT at a single institution between May 2005 and May 2014 with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were prospectively evaluated and included in this study. Failure was defined as removal of the allograft, revision transplantation, or conversion to a joint replacement. Patients were grouped according to the articular cartilage status at the time of the index surgery: group 1, intact or partial-thickness chondral loss; group 2, full-thickness chondral loss 1 condyle; and group 3, full-thickness chondral loss both condyles. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine significant predictors of failure, independently of other factors. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were produced for overall survival and significant predictors of failure in the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: There were 125 consecutive MATs performed, with 1 patient lost to follow-up. The median follow-up was 3 years (range, 1-10 years). The 5-year graft survival for the entire cohort was 82% (group 1, 97%; group 2, 82%; group 3, 62%). The probability of failure in group 1 was 85% lower (95% CI, 13%-97%) than in group 3 at any time. The probability of failure with lateral allografts was 76% lower (95% CI, 16%-89%) than medial allografts at any time. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the presence of severe cartilage damage at the time of MAT and medial allografts were significantly predictive of failure. Surgeons and patients should use this information when considering the risks and benefits of surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4994398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49943982016-08-31 Factors Predicting Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Failure Parkinson, Ben Smith, Nicholas Asplin, Laura Thompson, Peter Spalding, Tim Orthop J Sports Med 24 BACKGROUND: Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is performed to improve symptoms and function in patients with a meniscal-deficient compartment of the knee. Numerous studies have shown a consistent improvement in patient-reported outcomes, but high failure rates have been reported by some studies. The typical patients undergoing MAT often have multiple other pathologies that require treatment at the time of surgery. The factors that predict failure of a meniscal allograft within this complex patient group are not clearly defined. PURPOSE: To determine predictors of MAT failure in a large series to refine the indications for surgery and better inform future patients. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: All patients undergoing MAT at a single institution between May 2005 and May 2014 with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were prospectively evaluated and included in this study. Failure was defined as removal of the allograft, revision transplantation, or conversion to a joint replacement. Patients were grouped according to the articular cartilage status at the time of the index surgery: group 1, intact or partial-thickness chondral loss; group 2, full-thickness chondral loss 1 condyle; and group 3, full-thickness chondral loss both condyles. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine significant predictors of failure, independently of other factors. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were produced for overall survival and significant predictors of failure in the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: There were 125 consecutive MATs performed, with 1 patient lost to follow-up. The median follow-up was 3 years (range, 1-10 years). The 5-year graft survival for the entire cohort was 82% (group 1, 97%; group 2, 82%; group 3, 62%). The probability of failure in group 1 was 85% lower (95% CI, 13%-97%) than in group 3 at any time. The probability of failure with lateral allografts was 76% lower (95% CI, 16%-89%) than medial allografts at any time. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the presence of severe cartilage damage at the time of MAT and medial allografts were significantly predictive of failure. Surgeons and patients should use this information when considering the risks and benefits of surgery. SAGE Publications 2016-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4994398/ /pubmed/27583257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116663185 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 24
Parkinson, Ben
Smith, Nicholas
Asplin, Laura
Thompson, Peter
Spalding, Tim
Factors Predicting Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Failure
title Factors Predicting Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Failure
title_full Factors Predicting Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Failure
title_fullStr Factors Predicting Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Failure
title_full_unstemmed Factors Predicting Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Failure
title_short Factors Predicting Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Failure
title_sort factors predicting meniscal allograft transplantation failure
topic 24
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27583257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116663185
work_keys_str_mv AT parkinsonben factorspredictingmeniscalallografttransplantationfailure
AT smithnicholas factorspredictingmeniscalallografttransplantationfailure
AT asplinlaura factorspredictingmeniscalallografttransplantationfailure
AT thompsonpeter factorspredictingmeniscalallografttransplantationfailure
AT spaldingtim factorspredictingmeniscalallografttransplantationfailure