Cargando…

General practitioners’ perceptions of COPD treatment: thematic analysis of qualitative interviews

BACKGROUND: In Denmark, the treatment of COPD is mainly managed by general practitioners (GPs). Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is available to patients with COPD in the local community by GP referral, but in practice, many patients do not participate in rehabilitation. The aim of our study was to exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molin, Katrine Rutkær, Egerod, Ingrid, Valentiner, Laura Staun, Lange, Peter, Langberg, Henning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27574417
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S108611
_version_ 1782449379058122752
author Molin, Katrine Rutkær
Egerod, Ingrid
Valentiner, Laura Staun
Lange, Peter
Langberg, Henning
author_facet Molin, Katrine Rutkær
Egerod, Ingrid
Valentiner, Laura Staun
Lange, Peter
Langberg, Henning
author_sort Molin, Katrine Rutkær
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Denmark, the treatment of COPD is mainly managed by general practitioners (GPs). Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is available to patients with COPD in the local community by GP referral, but in practice, many patients do not participate in rehabilitation. The aim of our study was to explore 1) GPs’ perceptions of their role and responsibility in the rehabilitation of patients with COPD, and 2) GPs’ perceptions of how patients manage their COPD. METHODS: The study was based on a qualitative design with semi-structured key-informant interviews with GPs. Investigator triangulation was applied during data generation, and analysis was done using thematic analysis methodology. RESULTS: Our main findings were that GPs relied on patients themselves to take the initiative to make clinic appointments and on professionals at health centers to provide the PR including consultations on lifestyle changes. The GPs experienced that patients chose to come to the clinic when they were in distress and that patients either declined or had poor adherence to rehabilitation when offered. The GPs were relieved that the health centers had taken over the responsibility of rehabilitation as GPs lacked the resources to discuss rehabilitation and follow up on individual plans. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested a potential self-reinforcing problem with the treatment of COPD being mainly focused on medication rather than on PR. Neither GPs nor patients used a proactive approach. Further, GPs were not fully committed to discuss non-pharmacological treatment and perceived the patients as unmotivated for PR. As such, there is a need for optimizing non-pharmacological treatment of COPD and in particular the referral process to PR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4994802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49948022016-08-29 General practitioners’ perceptions of COPD treatment: thematic analysis of qualitative interviews Molin, Katrine Rutkær Egerod, Ingrid Valentiner, Laura Staun Lange, Peter Langberg, Henning Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: In Denmark, the treatment of COPD is mainly managed by general practitioners (GPs). Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is available to patients with COPD in the local community by GP referral, but in practice, many patients do not participate in rehabilitation. The aim of our study was to explore 1) GPs’ perceptions of their role and responsibility in the rehabilitation of patients with COPD, and 2) GPs’ perceptions of how patients manage their COPD. METHODS: The study was based on a qualitative design with semi-structured key-informant interviews with GPs. Investigator triangulation was applied during data generation, and analysis was done using thematic analysis methodology. RESULTS: Our main findings were that GPs relied on patients themselves to take the initiative to make clinic appointments and on professionals at health centers to provide the PR including consultations on lifestyle changes. The GPs experienced that patients chose to come to the clinic when they were in distress and that patients either declined or had poor adherence to rehabilitation when offered. The GPs were relieved that the health centers had taken over the responsibility of rehabilitation as GPs lacked the resources to discuss rehabilitation and follow up on individual plans. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested a potential self-reinforcing problem with the treatment of COPD being mainly focused on medication rather than on PR. Neither GPs nor patients used a proactive approach. Further, GPs were not fully committed to discuss non-pharmacological treatment and perceived the patients as unmotivated for PR. As such, there is a need for optimizing non-pharmacological treatment of COPD and in particular the referral process to PR. Dove Medical Press 2016-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4994802/ /pubmed/27574417 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S108611 Text en © 2016 Molin et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Molin, Katrine Rutkær
Egerod, Ingrid
Valentiner, Laura Staun
Lange, Peter
Langberg, Henning
General practitioners’ perceptions of COPD treatment: thematic analysis of qualitative interviews
title General practitioners’ perceptions of COPD treatment: thematic analysis of qualitative interviews
title_full General practitioners’ perceptions of COPD treatment: thematic analysis of qualitative interviews
title_fullStr General practitioners’ perceptions of COPD treatment: thematic analysis of qualitative interviews
title_full_unstemmed General practitioners’ perceptions of COPD treatment: thematic analysis of qualitative interviews
title_short General practitioners’ perceptions of COPD treatment: thematic analysis of qualitative interviews
title_sort general practitioners’ perceptions of copd treatment: thematic analysis of qualitative interviews
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27574417
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S108611
work_keys_str_mv AT molinkatrinerutkær generalpractitionersperceptionsofcopdtreatmentthematicanalysisofqualitativeinterviews
AT egerodingrid generalpractitionersperceptionsofcopdtreatmentthematicanalysisofqualitativeinterviews
AT valentinerlaurastaun generalpractitionersperceptionsofcopdtreatmentthematicanalysisofqualitativeinterviews
AT langepeter generalpractitionersperceptionsofcopdtreatmentthematicanalysisofqualitativeinterviews
AT langberghenning generalpractitionersperceptionsofcopdtreatmentthematicanalysisofqualitativeinterviews