Cargando…
The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index
OBJECTIVE: The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a patient self-assessed outcome measurement tool to assess disability, and that is frequently used to evaluate the effects of the treatment of neck-related problems. In individualized medicine it is mandatory that patients can interpret data in order to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161593 |
_version_ | 1782449407021547520 |
---|---|
author | Donk, Roland Verbeek, Andre Verhagen, Wim Groenewoud, Hans Hosman, Allard Bartels, Ronald |
author_facet | Donk, Roland Verbeek, Andre Verhagen, Wim Groenewoud, Hans Hosman, Allard Bartels, Ronald |
author_sort | Donk, Roland |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a patient self-assessed outcome measurement tool to assess disability, and that is frequently used to evaluate the effects of the treatment of neck-related problems. In individualized medicine it is mandatory that patients can interpret data in order to choose a treatment. A change of NDI or an absolute NDI is generally meaningless to a patient. Therefore, a correlation between the qualification of the clinical situation rated by the patient and the NDI score was evaluated. METHODS: Patients who completed an NDI after anterior surgery because of symptomatic single level degenerative cervical disc disease were asked one month after completion of the NDI to qualify their clinical situation of a 5-item Likert scale varying from excellent to bad. Since a clear distinction between the categories was not possible based on the total NDI score, a ROC-curve was built, and the AUC computed in order to estimate best dichotomization in qualification of the clinical situation. The best corresponding cut-off point for the NDI total score was found by studying sensitivity and specificity for all possible cut-off points. RESULTS: 102 patients were included. The highest AUC was obtained by dichotomizing the qualification into a group with good outcome and less-good outcome. The highest sensitivity and specificity for the dichotomized qualification as good outcome corresponded to a NDI ≤ 7. Sensitivity was 81.08% and specificity was 78.57%. CONCLUSION: This is the first study that correlated the qualification of the situation by the patients themselves and NDI. An NDI ≤ 7 corresponded to a good outcome according to the patients. This is valuable information to inform patients in their decision for any treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4995029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49950292016-09-12 The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index Donk, Roland Verbeek, Andre Verhagen, Wim Groenewoud, Hans Hosman, Allard Bartels, Ronald PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a patient self-assessed outcome measurement tool to assess disability, and that is frequently used to evaluate the effects of the treatment of neck-related problems. In individualized medicine it is mandatory that patients can interpret data in order to choose a treatment. A change of NDI or an absolute NDI is generally meaningless to a patient. Therefore, a correlation between the qualification of the clinical situation rated by the patient and the NDI score was evaluated. METHODS: Patients who completed an NDI after anterior surgery because of symptomatic single level degenerative cervical disc disease were asked one month after completion of the NDI to qualify their clinical situation of a 5-item Likert scale varying from excellent to bad. Since a clear distinction between the categories was not possible based on the total NDI score, a ROC-curve was built, and the AUC computed in order to estimate best dichotomization in qualification of the clinical situation. The best corresponding cut-off point for the NDI total score was found by studying sensitivity and specificity for all possible cut-off points. RESULTS: 102 patients were included. The highest AUC was obtained by dichotomizing the qualification into a group with good outcome and less-good outcome. The highest sensitivity and specificity for the dichotomized qualification as good outcome corresponded to a NDI ≤ 7. Sensitivity was 81.08% and specificity was 78.57%. CONCLUSION: This is the first study that correlated the qualification of the situation by the patients themselves and NDI. An NDI ≤ 7 corresponded to a good outcome according to the patients. This is valuable information to inform patients in their decision for any treatment. Public Library of Science 2016-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4995029/ /pubmed/27551964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161593 Text en © 2016 Donk et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Donk, Roland Verbeek, Andre Verhagen, Wim Groenewoud, Hans Hosman, Allard Bartels, Ronald The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index |
title | The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index |
title_full | The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index |
title_fullStr | The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index |
title_full_unstemmed | The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index |
title_short | The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index |
title_sort | qualification of outcome after cervical spine surgery by patients compared to the neck disability index |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161593 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donkroland thequalificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex AT verbeekandre thequalificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex AT verhagenwim thequalificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex AT groenewoudhans thequalificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex AT hosmanallard thequalificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex AT bartelsronald thequalificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex AT donkroland qualificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex AT verbeekandre qualificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex AT verhagenwim qualificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex AT groenewoudhans qualificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex AT hosmanallard qualificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex AT bartelsronald qualificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex |