Cargando…

The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index

OBJECTIVE: The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a patient self-assessed outcome measurement tool to assess disability, and that is frequently used to evaluate the effects of the treatment of neck-related problems. In individualized medicine it is mandatory that patients can interpret data in order to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donk, Roland, Verbeek, Andre, Verhagen, Wim, Groenewoud, Hans, Hosman, Allard, Bartels, Ronald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161593
_version_ 1782449407021547520
author Donk, Roland
Verbeek, Andre
Verhagen, Wim
Groenewoud, Hans
Hosman, Allard
Bartels, Ronald
author_facet Donk, Roland
Verbeek, Andre
Verhagen, Wim
Groenewoud, Hans
Hosman, Allard
Bartels, Ronald
author_sort Donk, Roland
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a patient self-assessed outcome measurement tool to assess disability, and that is frequently used to evaluate the effects of the treatment of neck-related problems. In individualized medicine it is mandatory that patients can interpret data in order to choose a treatment. A change of NDI or an absolute NDI is generally meaningless to a patient. Therefore, a correlation between the qualification of the clinical situation rated by the patient and the NDI score was evaluated. METHODS: Patients who completed an NDI after anterior surgery because of symptomatic single level degenerative cervical disc disease were asked one month after completion of the NDI to qualify their clinical situation of a 5-item Likert scale varying from excellent to bad. Since a clear distinction between the categories was not possible based on the total NDI score, a ROC-curve was built, and the AUC computed in order to estimate best dichotomization in qualification of the clinical situation. The best corresponding cut-off point for the NDI total score was found by studying sensitivity and specificity for all possible cut-off points. RESULTS: 102 patients were included. The highest AUC was obtained by dichotomizing the qualification into a group with good outcome and less-good outcome. The highest sensitivity and specificity for the dichotomized qualification as good outcome corresponded to a NDI ≤ 7. Sensitivity was 81.08% and specificity was 78.57%. CONCLUSION: This is the first study that correlated the qualification of the situation by the patients themselves and NDI. An NDI ≤ 7 corresponded to a good outcome according to the patients. This is valuable information to inform patients in their decision for any treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4995029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49950292016-09-12 The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index Donk, Roland Verbeek, Andre Verhagen, Wim Groenewoud, Hans Hosman, Allard Bartels, Ronald PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a patient self-assessed outcome measurement tool to assess disability, and that is frequently used to evaluate the effects of the treatment of neck-related problems. In individualized medicine it is mandatory that patients can interpret data in order to choose a treatment. A change of NDI or an absolute NDI is generally meaningless to a patient. Therefore, a correlation between the qualification of the clinical situation rated by the patient and the NDI score was evaluated. METHODS: Patients who completed an NDI after anterior surgery because of symptomatic single level degenerative cervical disc disease were asked one month after completion of the NDI to qualify their clinical situation of a 5-item Likert scale varying from excellent to bad. Since a clear distinction between the categories was not possible based on the total NDI score, a ROC-curve was built, and the AUC computed in order to estimate best dichotomization in qualification of the clinical situation. The best corresponding cut-off point for the NDI total score was found by studying sensitivity and specificity for all possible cut-off points. RESULTS: 102 patients were included. The highest AUC was obtained by dichotomizing the qualification into a group with good outcome and less-good outcome. The highest sensitivity and specificity for the dichotomized qualification as good outcome corresponded to a NDI ≤ 7. Sensitivity was 81.08% and specificity was 78.57%. CONCLUSION: This is the first study that correlated the qualification of the situation by the patients themselves and NDI. An NDI ≤ 7 corresponded to a good outcome according to the patients. This is valuable information to inform patients in their decision for any treatment. Public Library of Science 2016-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4995029/ /pubmed/27551964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161593 Text en © 2016 Donk et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Donk, Roland
Verbeek, Andre
Verhagen, Wim
Groenewoud, Hans
Hosman, Allard
Bartels, Ronald
The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index
title The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index
title_full The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index
title_fullStr The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index
title_full_unstemmed The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index
title_short The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index
title_sort qualification of outcome after cervical spine surgery by patients compared to the neck disability index
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161593
work_keys_str_mv AT donkroland thequalificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex
AT verbeekandre thequalificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex
AT verhagenwim thequalificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex
AT groenewoudhans thequalificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex
AT hosmanallard thequalificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex
AT bartelsronald thequalificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex
AT donkroland qualificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex
AT verbeekandre qualificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex
AT verhagenwim qualificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex
AT groenewoudhans qualificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex
AT hosmanallard qualificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex
AT bartelsronald qualificationofoutcomeaftercervicalspinesurgerybypatientscomparedtotheneckdisabilityindex