Cargando…
Clinical Factors for Prognosis and Treatment Guidance of Spinal Cord Astrocytoma
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: To obtain information useful in establishing treatment guidelines by evaluating baseline clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with spinal cord astrocytoma (SCA). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The optimal management of SCA remains controversial, a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27559457 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.748 |
_version_ | 1782449442853486592 |
---|---|
author | Seki, Toshitaka Hida, Kazutoshi Yano, Shunsuke Aoyama, Takeshi Koyanagi, Izumi Sasamori, Toru Hamauch, Shuji Houkin, Kiyohiro |
author_facet | Seki, Toshitaka Hida, Kazutoshi Yano, Shunsuke Aoyama, Takeshi Koyanagi, Izumi Sasamori, Toru Hamauch, Shuji Houkin, Kiyohiro |
author_sort | Seki, Toshitaka |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: To obtain information useful in establishing treatment guidelines by evaluating baseline clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with spinal cord astrocytoma (SCA). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The optimal management of SCA remains controversial, and there are no standard guidelines. METHODS: The study included 20 patients with low-grade and 13 with high-grade SCA surgically treated between 1989 and 2014. Patients were classified according to the extent of surgical resection. Survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier plots and compared between groups by log-rank tests. Neurological status was defined by the modified McCormick scale and compared between groups by Mann–Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Surgical resection was performed for 19 of 20 low-grade (95%) and 10 of 13 high-grade (76.9%) SCA patients. Only nine patients (27.3%) underwent gross total resection, all of whom had low-grade SCA. Of all patients, 51.5% showed deteriorated neurological status compared to preoperative baseline. Median overall survival was significantly longer for low-grade SCA than that (91 months, 78% at 5 years vs. 15 months, 31% at 5 years; p=0.007). Low-grade SCA patients benefited from more aggressive resection, whereas high-grade SCA patients did not. Multivariate analysis revealed histology status (hazard ratio [HR], 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09–0.98; p<0.05) and postoperative neurological status (HR, 0.12; CI, 0.02–0.95; p<0.05) as independent predictors of longer overall survival. Adjuvant radiotherapy had no significant impact on survival rate. However, a trend for increased survival was observed with radiation cordotomy (RCT) in high-grade SCA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive resection for low-grade and RCT may prolong survival. Preservation of neurological status is an important treatment goal. Given the low incidence of SCA, establishing strong collaborative, interdisciplinary, and multi-institutional study groups is necessary to define optimal treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4995260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Korean Society of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49952602016-08-24 Clinical Factors for Prognosis and Treatment Guidance of Spinal Cord Astrocytoma Seki, Toshitaka Hida, Kazutoshi Yano, Shunsuke Aoyama, Takeshi Koyanagi, Izumi Sasamori, Toru Hamauch, Shuji Houkin, Kiyohiro Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: To obtain information useful in establishing treatment guidelines by evaluating baseline clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with spinal cord astrocytoma (SCA). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The optimal management of SCA remains controversial, and there are no standard guidelines. METHODS: The study included 20 patients with low-grade and 13 with high-grade SCA surgically treated between 1989 and 2014. Patients were classified according to the extent of surgical resection. Survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier plots and compared between groups by log-rank tests. Neurological status was defined by the modified McCormick scale and compared between groups by Mann–Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Surgical resection was performed for 19 of 20 low-grade (95%) and 10 of 13 high-grade (76.9%) SCA patients. Only nine patients (27.3%) underwent gross total resection, all of whom had low-grade SCA. Of all patients, 51.5% showed deteriorated neurological status compared to preoperative baseline. Median overall survival was significantly longer for low-grade SCA than that (91 months, 78% at 5 years vs. 15 months, 31% at 5 years; p=0.007). Low-grade SCA patients benefited from more aggressive resection, whereas high-grade SCA patients did not. Multivariate analysis revealed histology status (hazard ratio [HR], 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09–0.98; p<0.05) and postoperative neurological status (HR, 0.12; CI, 0.02–0.95; p<0.05) as independent predictors of longer overall survival. Adjuvant radiotherapy had no significant impact on survival rate. However, a trend for increased survival was observed with radiation cordotomy (RCT) in high-grade SCA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive resection for low-grade and RCT may prolong survival. Preservation of neurological status is an important treatment goal. Given the low incidence of SCA, establishing strong collaborative, interdisciplinary, and multi-institutional study groups is necessary to define optimal treatments. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2016-08 2016-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4995260/ /pubmed/27559457 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.748 Text en Copyright © 2016 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Seki, Toshitaka Hida, Kazutoshi Yano, Shunsuke Aoyama, Takeshi Koyanagi, Izumi Sasamori, Toru Hamauch, Shuji Houkin, Kiyohiro Clinical Factors for Prognosis and Treatment Guidance of Spinal Cord Astrocytoma |
title | Clinical Factors for Prognosis and Treatment Guidance of Spinal Cord Astrocytoma |
title_full | Clinical Factors for Prognosis and Treatment Guidance of Spinal Cord Astrocytoma |
title_fullStr | Clinical Factors for Prognosis and Treatment Guidance of Spinal Cord Astrocytoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Factors for Prognosis and Treatment Guidance of Spinal Cord Astrocytoma |
title_short | Clinical Factors for Prognosis and Treatment Guidance of Spinal Cord Astrocytoma |
title_sort | clinical factors for prognosis and treatment guidance of spinal cord astrocytoma |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27559457 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.748 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sekitoshitaka clinicalfactorsforprognosisandtreatmentguidanceofspinalcordastrocytoma AT hidakazutoshi clinicalfactorsforprognosisandtreatmentguidanceofspinalcordastrocytoma AT yanoshunsuke clinicalfactorsforprognosisandtreatmentguidanceofspinalcordastrocytoma AT aoyamatakeshi clinicalfactorsforprognosisandtreatmentguidanceofspinalcordastrocytoma AT koyanagiizumi clinicalfactorsforprognosisandtreatmentguidanceofspinalcordastrocytoma AT sasamoritoru clinicalfactorsforprognosisandtreatmentguidanceofspinalcordastrocytoma AT hamauchshuji clinicalfactorsforprognosisandtreatmentguidanceofspinalcordastrocytoma AT houkinkiyohiro clinicalfactorsforprognosisandtreatmentguidanceofspinalcordastrocytoma |