Cargando…

Validity of a tablet computer version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire: a pilot study

The Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire (JHEQ) was established as a new patient-reported outcome for patients with hip disease. We developed a JHEQ application beta version for tablet computers. The application has a slider system to input visual analogue scale (VAS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takegami, Yasuhiko, Seki, Taisuke, Kaneuji, Ayumi, Nakao, Akinobu, Hasegawa, Yukiharu, Ishiguro, Naoki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nagoya University 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27578907
_version_ 1782449444927569920
author Takegami, Yasuhiko
Seki, Taisuke
Kaneuji, Ayumi
Nakao, Akinobu
Hasegawa, Yukiharu
Ishiguro, Naoki
author_facet Takegami, Yasuhiko
Seki, Taisuke
Kaneuji, Ayumi
Nakao, Akinobu
Hasegawa, Yukiharu
Ishiguro, Naoki
author_sort Takegami, Yasuhiko
collection PubMed
description The Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire (JHEQ) was established as a new patient-reported outcome for patients with hip disease. We developed a JHEQ application beta version for tablet computers. The application has a slider system to input visual analogue scale (VAS) measurements. The purposes of this study were 1) to test whether the VAS that was acquired from this slider system was equal to the value recorded on paper and 2) to evaluate the validity and agreement of the JHEQ tablet version. A total of 57 patients were analyzed in the study (mean age, 60.2 years; range, 29–81 years). They received either the paper-and-pencil version (paper version) or the tablet computer version (tablet version). To evaluate the validity of the tablet version, we analyzed differences in the VAS and total scores between the paper version and tablet computer version. In addition, we calculated Cronbach’s alpha, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (CC). The VAS scores in the tablet version were significantly lower than those in the paper version (22.3 ± 5.4 vs. 17.0 ± 4.5 and 28.1 ± 6.1 vs. 23.5 ± 5.3, respectively; all P < 0.05). Values of Cronbach’s alpha, the ICC, and the CC among subscales ranged from 0.90 to 0.95. In conclusion, the total JHEQ score on the tablet computer beta version was in agreement with the score on the paper version. However, the VAS on the tablet version, which used a slider bar system, proved unreliable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4995269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nagoya University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49952692016-08-30 Validity of a tablet computer version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire: a pilot study Takegami, Yasuhiko Seki, Taisuke Kaneuji, Ayumi Nakao, Akinobu Hasegawa, Yukiharu Ishiguro, Naoki Nagoya J Med Sci Original Paper The Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire (JHEQ) was established as a new patient-reported outcome for patients with hip disease. We developed a JHEQ application beta version for tablet computers. The application has a slider system to input visual analogue scale (VAS) measurements. The purposes of this study were 1) to test whether the VAS that was acquired from this slider system was equal to the value recorded on paper and 2) to evaluate the validity and agreement of the JHEQ tablet version. A total of 57 patients were analyzed in the study (mean age, 60.2 years; range, 29–81 years). They received either the paper-and-pencil version (paper version) or the tablet computer version (tablet version). To evaluate the validity of the tablet version, we analyzed differences in the VAS and total scores between the paper version and tablet computer version. In addition, we calculated Cronbach’s alpha, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (CC). The VAS scores in the tablet version were significantly lower than those in the paper version (22.3 ± 5.4 vs. 17.0 ± 4.5 and 28.1 ± 6.1 vs. 23.5 ± 5.3, respectively; all P < 0.05). Values of Cronbach’s alpha, the ICC, and the CC among subscales ranged from 0.90 to 0.95. In conclusion, the total JHEQ score on the tablet computer beta version was in agreement with the score on the paper version. However, the VAS on the tablet version, which used a slider bar system, proved unreliable. Nagoya University 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4995269/ /pubmed/27578907 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Paper
Takegami, Yasuhiko
Seki, Taisuke
Kaneuji, Ayumi
Nakao, Akinobu
Hasegawa, Yukiharu
Ishiguro, Naoki
Validity of a tablet computer version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire: a pilot study
title Validity of a tablet computer version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire: a pilot study
title_full Validity of a tablet computer version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire: a pilot study
title_fullStr Validity of a tablet computer version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Validity of a tablet computer version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire: a pilot study
title_short Validity of a tablet computer version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire: a pilot study
title_sort validity of a tablet computer version of the japanese orthopaedic association hip disease evaluation questionnaire: a pilot study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27578907
work_keys_str_mv AT takegamiyasuhiko validityofatabletcomputerversionofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociationhipdiseaseevaluationquestionnaireapilotstudy
AT sekitaisuke validityofatabletcomputerversionofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociationhipdiseaseevaluationquestionnaireapilotstudy
AT kaneujiayumi validityofatabletcomputerversionofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociationhipdiseaseevaluationquestionnaireapilotstudy
AT nakaoakinobu validityofatabletcomputerversionofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociationhipdiseaseevaluationquestionnaireapilotstudy
AT hasegawayukiharu validityofatabletcomputerversionofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociationhipdiseaseevaluationquestionnaireapilotstudy
AT ishiguronaoki validityofatabletcomputerversionofthejapaneseorthopaedicassociationhipdiseaseevaluationquestionnaireapilotstudy