Cargando…

How Important Is the Etiology in the Treatment of Epiphora?

Purpose. There are several etiological factors that cause epiphora, and treatment differs according to the cause. We aimed to evaluate the etiology of epiphora and the treatment modalities of the affected patients. Materials and Methods. Data of patients who were referred to ophthalmology clinics fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ulusoy, Mahmut Oğuz, Kıvanç, Sertaç Argun, Atakan, Mehmet, Akova-Budak, Berna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27595013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1438376
_version_ 1782449453898137600
author Ulusoy, Mahmut Oğuz
Kıvanç, Sertaç Argun
Atakan, Mehmet
Akova-Budak, Berna
author_facet Ulusoy, Mahmut Oğuz
Kıvanç, Sertaç Argun
Atakan, Mehmet
Akova-Budak, Berna
author_sort Ulusoy, Mahmut Oğuz
collection PubMed
description Purpose. There are several etiological factors that cause epiphora, and treatment differs according to the cause. We aimed to evaluate the etiology of epiphora and the treatment modalities of the affected patients. Materials and Methods. Data of patients who were referred to ophthalmology clinics for epiphora were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were evaluated for epiphora etiology, treatment modalities, and duration of complaints, after complete ophthalmologic examination. Results. This study consisted of 163 patients with a mean age of 64.61 ± 16.52 years (range 1–92 years). Lacrimal system disease (48.4% [79/163]) was the most common cause, followed by ocular surface disease (dry eye/blepharitis) (38.7% [63/163]). Among the patients included in this study, 69% (113/163) did not receive any treatment, whereas only 1.8% (3/163) were treated surgically. About 4.3% of the patients (7/163) had a complaint for more than 5 years (p = 0.012) and six of these had chronic dacryocystitis and one had ectropion. Conclusion. Epiphora not only has a negative impact on patients' comfort, but also puts them at risk for probable intraocular operations in the future. Therefore, the wide range of its etiology must be taken into consideration and adequate etiology-specific treatment options must be applied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4995336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49953362016-09-04 How Important Is the Etiology in the Treatment of Epiphora? Ulusoy, Mahmut Oğuz Kıvanç, Sertaç Argun Atakan, Mehmet Akova-Budak, Berna J Ophthalmol Research Article Purpose. There are several etiological factors that cause epiphora, and treatment differs according to the cause. We aimed to evaluate the etiology of epiphora and the treatment modalities of the affected patients. Materials and Methods. Data of patients who were referred to ophthalmology clinics for epiphora were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were evaluated for epiphora etiology, treatment modalities, and duration of complaints, after complete ophthalmologic examination. Results. This study consisted of 163 patients with a mean age of 64.61 ± 16.52 years (range 1–92 years). Lacrimal system disease (48.4% [79/163]) was the most common cause, followed by ocular surface disease (dry eye/blepharitis) (38.7% [63/163]). Among the patients included in this study, 69% (113/163) did not receive any treatment, whereas only 1.8% (3/163) were treated surgically. About 4.3% of the patients (7/163) had a complaint for more than 5 years (p = 0.012) and six of these had chronic dacryocystitis and one had ectropion. Conclusion. Epiphora not only has a negative impact on patients' comfort, but also puts them at risk for probable intraocular operations in the future. Therefore, the wide range of its etiology must be taken into consideration and adequate etiology-specific treatment options must be applied. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4995336/ /pubmed/27595013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1438376 Text en Copyright © 2016 Mahmut Oğuz Ulusoy et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ulusoy, Mahmut Oğuz
Kıvanç, Sertaç Argun
Atakan, Mehmet
Akova-Budak, Berna
How Important Is the Etiology in the Treatment of Epiphora?
title How Important Is the Etiology in the Treatment of Epiphora?
title_full How Important Is the Etiology in the Treatment of Epiphora?
title_fullStr How Important Is the Etiology in the Treatment of Epiphora?
title_full_unstemmed How Important Is the Etiology in the Treatment of Epiphora?
title_short How Important Is the Etiology in the Treatment of Epiphora?
title_sort how important is the etiology in the treatment of epiphora?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27595013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1438376
work_keys_str_mv AT ulusoymahmutoguz howimportantistheetiologyinthetreatmentofepiphora
AT kıvancsertacargun howimportantistheetiologyinthetreatmentofepiphora
AT atakanmehmet howimportantistheetiologyinthetreatmentofepiphora
AT akovabudakberna howimportantistheetiologyinthetreatmentofepiphora