Cargando…
The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours
BACKGROUND: Challenging behaviour, especially in intellectual disability, covers a wide range that is in need of further evaluation. AIMS: To develop a short but comprehensive instrument for all aspects of challenging behaviour. METHOD: In the first part of a two-stage enquiry, a 28-item scale was c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal College of Psychiatrists
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002360 |
_version_ | 1782449496400068608 |
---|---|
author | Tyrer, Peter Nagar, Jessica Evans, Rosie Oliver, Patricia Bassett, Paul Liedtka, Natalie Tarabi, Aris |
author_facet | Tyrer, Peter Nagar, Jessica Evans, Rosie Oliver, Patricia Bassett, Paul Liedtka, Natalie Tarabi, Aris |
author_sort | Tyrer, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Challenging behaviour, especially in intellectual disability, covers a wide range that is in need of further evaluation. AIMS: To develop a short but comprehensive instrument for all aspects of challenging behaviour. METHOD: In the first part of a two-stage enquiry, a 28-item scale was constructed to examine the components of challenging behaviour. Following a simple factor analysis this was developed further to create a new short scale, the Problem Behaviour Checklist (PBCL). The scale was subsequently used in a randomised controlled trial and tested for interrater reliability. Scores were also compared with a standard scale, the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS). RESULTS: Seven identified factors – personal violence, violence against property, self-harm, sexually inappropriate, contrary, demanding and disappearing behaviour – were scored on a 5-point scale. A subsequent factor analysis with the second population showed demanding, violent and contrary behaviour to account for most of the variance. Interrater reliability using weighted kappa showed good agreement (0.91; 95% CI 0.83–0.99). Good agreement was also shown with scores on the MOAS and a score of 1 on the PBCL showed high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (85%) for a threshold MOASscore of 4. CONCLUSIONS: The PBCL appears to be a suitable and practical scale for assessing all aspects of challenging behaviour. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. COPYRIGHT AND USAGE: © 2016 The Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4995567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Royal College of Psychiatrists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49955672016-10-04 The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours Tyrer, Peter Nagar, Jessica Evans, Rosie Oliver, Patricia Bassett, Paul Liedtka, Natalie Tarabi, Aris BJPsych Open Short Report BACKGROUND: Challenging behaviour, especially in intellectual disability, covers a wide range that is in need of further evaluation. AIMS: To develop a short but comprehensive instrument for all aspects of challenging behaviour. METHOD: In the first part of a two-stage enquiry, a 28-item scale was constructed to examine the components of challenging behaviour. Following a simple factor analysis this was developed further to create a new short scale, the Problem Behaviour Checklist (PBCL). The scale was subsequently used in a randomised controlled trial and tested for interrater reliability. Scores were also compared with a standard scale, the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS). RESULTS: Seven identified factors – personal violence, violence against property, self-harm, sexually inappropriate, contrary, demanding and disappearing behaviour – were scored on a 5-point scale. A subsequent factor analysis with the second population showed demanding, violent and contrary behaviour to account for most of the variance. Interrater reliability using weighted kappa showed good agreement (0.91; 95% CI 0.83–0.99). Good agreement was also shown with scores on the MOAS and a score of 1 on the PBCL showed high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (85%) for a threshold MOASscore of 4. CONCLUSIONS: The PBCL appears to be a suitable and practical scale for assessing all aspects of challenging behaviour. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. COPYRIGHT AND USAGE: © 2016 The Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4995567/ /pubmed/27703753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002360 Text en © 2016 The Royal College of Psychiatrists http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Short Report Tyrer, Peter Nagar, Jessica Evans, Rosie Oliver, Patricia Bassett, Paul Liedtka, Natalie Tarabi, Aris The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours |
title | The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours |
title_full | The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours |
title_fullStr | The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours |
title_full_unstemmed | The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours |
title_short | The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours |
title_sort | problem behaviour checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002360 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tyrerpeter theproblembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours AT nagarjessica theproblembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours AT evansrosie theproblembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours AT oliverpatricia theproblembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours AT bassettpaul theproblembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours AT liedtkanatalie theproblembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours AT tarabiaris theproblembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours AT tyrerpeter problembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours AT nagarjessica problembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours AT evansrosie problembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours AT oliverpatricia problembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours AT bassettpaul problembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours AT liedtkanatalie problembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours AT tarabiaris problembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours |