Cargando…

The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours

BACKGROUND: Challenging behaviour, especially in intellectual disability, covers a wide range that is in need of further evaluation. AIMS: To develop a short but comprehensive instrument for all aspects of challenging behaviour. METHOD: In the first part of a two-stage enquiry, a 28-item scale was c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tyrer, Peter, Nagar, Jessica, Evans, Rosie, Oliver, Patricia, Bassett, Paul, Liedtka, Natalie, Tarabi, Aris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002360
_version_ 1782449496400068608
author Tyrer, Peter
Nagar, Jessica
Evans, Rosie
Oliver, Patricia
Bassett, Paul
Liedtka, Natalie
Tarabi, Aris
author_facet Tyrer, Peter
Nagar, Jessica
Evans, Rosie
Oliver, Patricia
Bassett, Paul
Liedtka, Natalie
Tarabi, Aris
author_sort Tyrer, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Challenging behaviour, especially in intellectual disability, covers a wide range that is in need of further evaluation. AIMS: To develop a short but comprehensive instrument for all aspects of challenging behaviour. METHOD: In the first part of a two-stage enquiry, a 28-item scale was constructed to examine the components of challenging behaviour. Following a simple factor analysis this was developed further to create a new short scale, the Problem Behaviour Checklist (PBCL). The scale was subsequently used in a randomised controlled trial and tested for interrater reliability. Scores were also compared with a standard scale, the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS). RESULTS: Seven identified factors – personal violence, violence against property, self-harm, sexually inappropriate, contrary, demanding and disappearing behaviour – were scored on a 5-point scale. A subsequent factor analysis with the second population showed demanding, violent and contrary behaviour to account for most of the variance. Interrater reliability using weighted kappa showed good agreement (0.91; 95% CI 0.83–0.99). Good agreement was also shown with scores on the MOAS and a score of 1 on the PBCL showed high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (85%) for a threshold MOASscore of 4. CONCLUSIONS: The PBCL appears to be a suitable and practical scale for assessing all aspects of challenging behaviour. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. COPYRIGHT AND USAGE: © 2016 The Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) licence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4995567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Royal College of Psychiatrists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49955672016-10-04 The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours Tyrer, Peter Nagar, Jessica Evans, Rosie Oliver, Patricia Bassett, Paul Liedtka, Natalie Tarabi, Aris BJPsych Open Short Report BACKGROUND: Challenging behaviour, especially in intellectual disability, covers a wide range that is in need of further evaluation. AIMS: To develop a short but comprehensive instrument for all aspects of challenging behaviour. METHOD: In the first part of a two-stage enquiry, a 28-item scale was constructed to examine the components of challenging behaviour. Following a simple factor analysis this was developed further to create a new short scale, the Problem Behaviour Checklist (PBCL). The scale was subsequently used in a randomised controlled trial and tested for interrater reliability. Scores were also compared with a standard scale, the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS). RESULTS: Seven identified factors – personal violence, violence against property, self-harm, sexually inappropriate, contrary, demanding and disappearing behaviour – were scored on a 5-point scale. A subsequent factor analysis with the second population showed demanding, violent and contrary behaviour to account for most of the variance. Interrater reliability using weighted kappa showed good agreement (0.91; 95% CI 0.83–0.99). Good agreement was also shown with scores on the MOAS and a score of 1 on the PBCL showed high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (85%) for a threshold MOASscore of 4. CONCLUSIONS: The PBCL appears to be a suitable and practical scale for assessing all aspects of challenging behaviour. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. COPYRIGHT AND USAGE: © 2016 The Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4995567/ /pubmed/27703753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002360 Text en © 2016 The Royal College of Psychiatrists http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Report
Tyrer, Peter
Nagar, Jessica
Evans, Rosie
Oliver, Patricia
Bassett, Paul
Liedtka, Natalie
Tarabi, Aris
The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours
title The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours
title_full The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours
title_fullStr The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours
title_full_unstemmed The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours
title_short The Problem Behaviour Checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours
title_sort problem behaviour checklist: short scale to assess challenging behaviours
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002360
work_keys_str_mv AT tyrerpeter theproblembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours
AT nagarjessica theproblembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours
AT evansrosie theproblembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours
AT oliverpatricia theproblembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours
AT bassettpaul theproblembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours
AT liedtkanatalie theproblembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours
AT tarabiaris theproblembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours
AT tyrerpeter problembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours
AT nagarjessica problembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours
AT evansrosie problembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours
AT oliverpatricia problembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours
AT bassettpaul problembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours
AT liedtkanatalie problembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours
AT tarabiaris problembehaviourchecklistshortscaletoassesschallengingbehaviours