Cargando…

Evaluation of a risk-stratification strategy to improve primary care for low back pain: the MATCH cluster randomized trial protocol

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous options for treating back pain and the increasing healthcare resources devoted to this problem, the prevalence and impact of back pain-related disability has not improved. It is now recognized that psychosocial factors, as well as physical factors, are important predicto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cherkin, Dan, Balderson, Benjamin, Brewer, Georgie, Cook, Andrea, Estlin, Katherine Talbert, Evers, Sarah C., Foster, Nadine E., Hill, Jonathan C., Hawkes, Rene, Hsu, Clarissa, Jensen, Mark, LaPorte, Anne-Marie, Levine, Martin D., Piekara, Diane, Rock, Pam, Sherman, Karen, Sowden, Gail, Wellman, Rob, Yeoman, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27553626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1219-0
_version_ 1782449512056356864
author Cherkin, Dan
Balderson, Benjamin
Brewer, Georgie
Cook, Andrea
Estlin, Katherine Talbert
Evers, Sarah C.
Foster, Nadine E.
Hill, Jonathan C.
Hawkes, Rene
Hsu, Clarissa
Jensen, Mark
LaPorte, Anne-Marie
Levine, Martin D.
Piekara, Diane
Rock, Pam
Sherman, Karen
Sowden, Gail
Wellman, Rob
Yeoman, John
author_facet Cherkin, Dan
Balderson, Benjamin
Brewer, Georgie
Cook, Andrea
Estlin, Katherine Talbert
Evers, Sarah C.
Foster, Nadine E.
Hill, Jonathan C.
Hawkes, Rene
Hsu, Clarissa
Jensen, Mark
LaPorte, Anne-Marie
Levine, Martin D.
Piekara, Diane
Rock, Pam
Sherman, Karen
Sowden, Gail
Wellman, Rob
Yeoman, John
author_sort Cherkin, Dan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite numerous options for treating back pain and the increasing healthcare resources devoted to this problem, the prevalence and impact of back pain-related disability has not improved. It is now recognized that psychosocial factors, as well as physical factors, are important predictors of poor outcomes for back pain. A promising new approach that matches treatments to the physical and psychosocial obstacles to recovery, the STarT Back risk stratification approach, improved patients’ physical function while reducing costs of care in the United Kingdom (UK). This trial evaluates implementation of this strategy in a United States (US) healthcare setting. METHODS: Six large primary care clinics in an integrated healthcare system in Washington State were block-randomized, three to receive an intensive quality improvement intervention for back pain and three to serve as controls for secular trends. The intervention included 6 one-hour training sessions for physicians, 5 days of training for physical therapists, individualized and group coaching of clinicians, and integration of the STarT Back tool into the electronic health record. This prognostic tool uses 9 questions to categorize patients at low, medium or high risk of persistent disabling pain with recommendations about evidence-based treatment options appropriate for each subgroup. Patients at least 18 years of age, receiving primary care for non-specific low back pain, were invited to provide data 1–3 weeks after their primary care visit and follow-up data 2 months and 6 months (primary endpoint) later. The primary outcomes are back-related physical function and pain severity. Using an intention to treat approach, intervention effects on patient outcomes will be estimated by comparing mean changes at the 2 and 6 month follow-up between the pre- and post-implementation periods. The inclusion of control clinics permits adjustment for secular trends. Differences in change scores by intervention group and time period will be estimated using linear mixed models with random effects. Secondary outcomes include healthcare utilization and adherence to clinical guidelines. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide the first randomized trial evidence of the clinical effectiveness of implementing risk stratification with matched treatment options for low back pain in a United States health care delivery system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02286141. Registered November 5, 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1219-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4995645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49956452016-08-25 Evaluation of a risk-stratification strategy to improve primary care for low back pain: the MATCH cluster randomized trial protocol Cherkin, Dan Balderson, Benjamin Brewer, Georgie Cook, Andrea Estlin, Katherine Talbert Evers, Sarah C. Foster, Nadine E. Hill, Jonathan C. Hawkes, Rene Hsu, Clarissa Jensen, Mark LaPorte, Anne-Marie Levine, Martin D. Piekara, Diane Rock, Pam Sherman, Karen Sowden, Gail Wellman, Rob Yeoman, John BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Despite numerous options for treating back pain and the increasing healthcare resources devoted to this problem, the prevalence and impact of back pain-related disability has not improved. It is now recognized that psychosocial factors, as well as physical factors, are important predictors of poor outcomes for back pain. A promising new approach that matches treatments to the physical and psychosocial obstacles to recovery, the STarT Back risk stratification approach, improved patients’ physical function while reducing costs of care in the United Kingdom (UK). This trial evaluates implementation of this strategy in a United States (US) healthcare setting. METHODS: Six large primary care clinics in an integrated healthcare system in Washington State were block-randomized, three to receive an intensive quality improvement intervention for back pain and three to serve as controls for secular trends. The intervention included 6 one-hour training sessions for physicians, 5 days of training for physical therapists, individualized and group coaching of clinicians, and integration of the STarT Back tool into the electronic health record. This prognostic tool uses 9 questions to categorize patients at low, medium or high risk of persistent disabling pain with recommendations about evidence-based treatment options appropriate for each subgroup. Patients at least 18 years of age, receiving primary care for non-specific low back pain, were invited to provide data 1–3 weeks after their primary care visit and follow-up data 2 months and 6 months (primary endpoint) later. The primary outcomes are back-related physical function and pain severity. Using an intention to treat approach, intervention effects on patient outcomes will be estimated by comparing mean changes at the 2 and 6 month follow-up between the pre- and post-implementation periods. The inclusion of control clinics permits adjustment for secular trends. Differences in change scores by intervention group and time period will be estimated using linear mixed models with random effects. Secondary outcomes include healthcare utilization and adherence to clinical guidelines. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide the first randomized trial evidence of the clinical effectiveness of implementing risk stratification with matched treatment options for low back pain in a United States health care delivery system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02286141. Registered November 5, 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1219-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4995645/ /pubmed/27553626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1219-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Cherkin, Dan
Balderson, Benjamin
Brewer, Georgie
Cook, Andrea
Estlin, Katherine Talbert
Evers, Sarah C.
Foster, Nadine E.
Hill, Jonathan C.
Hawkes, Rene
Hsu, Clarissa
Jensen, Mark
LaPorte, Anne-Marie
Levine, Martin D.
Piekara, Diane
Rock, Pam
Sherman, Karen
Sowden, Gail
Wellman, Rob
Yeoman, John
Evaluation of a risk-stratification strategy to improve primary care for low back pain: the MATCH cluster randomized trial protocol
title Evaluation of a risk-stratification strategy to improve primary care for low back pain: the MATCH cluster randomized trial protocol
title_full Evaluation of a risk-stratification strategy to improve primary care for low back pain: the MATCH cluster randomized trial protocol
title_fullStr Evaluation of a risk-stratification strategy to improve primary care for low back pain: the MATCH cluster randomized trial protocol
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a risk-stratification strategy to improve primary care for low back pain: the MATCH cluster randomized trial protocol
title_short Evaluation of a risk-stratification strategy to improve primary care for low back pain: the MATCH cluster randomized trial protocol
title_sort evaluation of a risk-stratification strategy to improve primary care for low back pain: the match cluster randomized trial protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27553626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1219-0
work_keys_str_mv AT cherkindan evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT baldersonbenjamin evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT brewergeorgie evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT cookandrea evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT estlinkatherinetalbert evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT everssarahc evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT fosternadinee evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT hilljonathanc evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT hawkesrene evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT hsuclarissa evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT jensenmark evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT laporteannemarie evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT levinemartind evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT piekaradiane evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT rockpam evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT shermankaren evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT sowdengail evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT wellmanrob evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol
AT yeomanjohn evaluationofariskstratificationstrategytoimproveprimarycareforlowbackpainthematchclusterrandomizedtrialprotocol