Cargando…

Different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (EmbryoScope(TM)) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot study

BACKGROUND: Previously manual human embryology in many in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers is rapidly being replaced by closed embryo incubation systems with time-lapse imaging. Whether such systems perform comparably to manual embryology in different IVF patient populations has, however, never bef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Yan-Guang, Lazzaroni-Tealdi, Emanuela, Wang, Qi, Zhang, Lin, Barad, David H., Kushnir, Vitaly A., Darmon, Sarah K., Albertini, David F., Gleicher, Norbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27553622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-016-0181-x
_version_ 1782449541123932160
author Wu, Yan-Guang
Lazzaroni-Tealdi, Emanuela
Wang, Qi
Zhang, Lin
Barad, David H.
Kushnir, Vitaly A.
Darmon, Sarah K.
Albertini, David F.
Gleicher, Norbert
author_facet Wu, Yan-Guang
Lazzaroni-Tealdi, Emanuela
Wang, Qi
Zhang, Lin
Barad, David H.
Kushnir, Vitaly A.
Darmon, Sarah K.
Albertini, David F.
Gleicher, Norbert
author_sort Wu, Yan-Guang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previously manual human embryology in many in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers is rapidly being replaced by closed embryo incubation systems with time-lapse imaging. Whether such systems perform comparably to manual embryology in different IVF patient populations has, however, never before been investigated. We, therefore, prospectively compared embryo quality following closed system culture with time-lapse photography (EmbryoScope™) and standard embryology. We performed a two-part prospectively randomized study in IVF (clinical trial # NCT92256309). Part A involved 31 infertile poor prognosis patients prospectively randomized to EmbryoScope™ and standard embryology. Part B involved embryos from 17 egg donor-recipient cycles resulting in large egg/embryo numbers, thus permitting prospectively alternative embryo assignments to EmbryoScope™ and standard embryology. We then compared pregnancy rates and embryo quality on day-3 after fertilization and embryologist time utilized per processed embryo. RESULTS: Part A revealed in poor prognosis patients no differences in day-3 embryo scores, implantation and clinical pregnancy rates between EmbryoScope™ and standard embryology. The EmbryoScope™, however, more than doubled embryology staff time (P < 0.0001). In Part B, embryos grown in the EmbyoScope™ demonstrated significantly poorer day-3 quality (depending on embryo parameter between P = 0.005 and P = 0.01). Suspicion that conical culture dishes of the EmbryoScope™ (EmbryoSlide™) may be the cause was disproven when standard culture dishes demonstrated no outcome difference in standard incubation. CONCLUSIONS: Though due to small patient numbers preliminary, this study raises concerns about the mostly uncontrolled introduction of closed incubation systems with time lapse imaging into routine clinical embryology. Appropriately designed and powered prospectively randomized studies appear urgently needed in well-defined patient populations before the uncontrolled utilization of these instruments further expands. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02246309 Registered September 18, 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4995783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49957832016-08-25 Different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (EmbryoScope(TM)) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot study Wu, Yan-Guang Lazzaroni-Tealdi, Emanuela Wang, Qi Zhang, Lin Barad, David H. Kushnir, Vitaly A. Darmon, Sarah K. Albertini, David F. Gleicher, Norbert Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Previously manual human embryology in many in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers is rapidly being replaced by closed embryo incubation systems with time-lapse imaging. Whether such systems perform comparably to manual embryology in different IVF patient populations has, however, never before been investigated. We, therefore, prospectively compared embryo quality following closed system culture with time-lapse photography (EmbryoScope™) and standard embryology. We performed a two-part prospectively randomized study in IVF (clinical trial # NCT92256309). Part A involved 31 infertile poor prognosis patients prospectively randomized to EmbryoScope™ and standard embryology. Part B involved embryos from 17 egg donor-recipient cycles resulting in large egg/embryo numbers, thus permitting prospectively alternative embryo assignments to EmbryoScope™ and standard embryology. We then compared pregnancy rates and embryo quality on day-3 after fertilization and embryologist time utilized per processed embryo. RESULTS: Part A revealed in poor prognosis patients no differences in day-3 embryo scores, implantation and clinical pregnancy rates between EmbryoScope™ and standard embryology. The EmbryoScope™, however, more than doubled embryology staff time (P < 0.0001). In Part B, embryos grown in the EmbyoScope™ demonstrated significantly poorer day-3 quality (depending on embryo parameter between P = 0.005 and P = 0.01). Suspicion that conical culture dishes of the EmbryoScope™ (EmbryoSlide™) may be the cause was disproven when standard culture dishes demonstrated no outcome difference in standard incubation. CONCLUSIONS: Though due to small patient numbers preliminary, this study raises concerns about the mostly uncontrolled introduction of closed incubation systems with time lapse imaging into routine clinical embryology. Appropriately designed and powered prospectively randomized studies appear urgently needed in well-defined patient populations before the uncontrolled utilization of these instruments further expands. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02246309 Registered September 18, 2014. BioMed Central 2016-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4995783/ /pubmed/27553622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-016-0181-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wu, Yan-Guang
Lazzaroni-Tealdi, Emanuela
Wang, Qi
Zhang, Lin
Barad, David H.
Kushnir, Vitaly A.
Darmon, Sarah K.
Albertini, David F.
Gleicher, Norbert
Different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (EmbryoScope(TM)) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot study
title Different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (EmbryoScope(TM)) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot study
title_full Different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (EmbryoScope(TM)) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot study
title_fullStr Different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (EmbryoScope(TM)) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (EmbryoScope(TM)) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot study
title_short Different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (EmbryoScope(TM)) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot study
title_sort different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (embryoscope(tm)) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27553622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-016-0181-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wuyanguang differenteffectivenessofclosedembryoculturesystemwithtimelapseimagingembryoscopetmincomparisontostandardmanualembryologyingoodandpoorprognosispatientsaprospectivelyrandomizedpilotstudy
AT lazzaronitealdiemanuela differenteffectivenessofclosedembryoculturesystemwithtimelapseimagingembryoscopetmincomparisontostandardmanualembryologyingoodandpoorprognosispatientsaprospectivelyrandomizedpilotstudy
AT wangqi differenteffectivenessofclosedembryoculturesystemwithtimelapseimagingembryoscopetmincomparisontostandardmanualembryologyingoodandpoorprognosispatientsaprospectivelyrandomizedpilotstudy
AT zhanglin differenteffectivenessofclosedembryoculturesystemwithtimelapseimagingembryoscopetmincomparisontostandardmanualembryologyingoodandpoorprognosispatientsaprospectivelyrandomizedpilotstudy
AT baraddavidh differenteffectivenessofclosedembryoculturesystemwithtimelapseimagingembryoscopetmincomparisontostandardmanualembryologyingoodandpoorprognosispatientsaprospectivelyrandomizedpilotstudy
AT kushnirvitalya differenteffectivenessofclosedembryoculturesystemwithtimelapseimagingembryoscopetmincomparisontostandardmanualembryologyingoodandpoorprognosispatientsaprospectivelyrandomizedpilotstudy
AT darmonsarahk differenteffectivenessofclosedembryoculturesystemwithtimelapseimagingembryoscopetmincomparisontostandardmanualembryologyingoodandpoorprognosispatientsaprospectivelyrandomizedpilotstudy
AT albertinidavidf differenteffectivenessofclosedembryoculturesystemwithtimelapseimagingembryoscopetmincomparisontostandardmanualembryologyingoodandpoorprognosispatientsaprospectivelyrandomizedpilotstudy
AT gleichernorbert differenteffectivenessofclosedembryoculturesystemwithtimelapseimagingembryoscopetmincomparisontostandardmanualembryologyingoodandpoorprognosispatientsaprospectivelyrandomizedpilotstudy