Cargando…

Lung hyperaeration assessment by computed tomography: correction of reconstruction-induced bias

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) reconstruction parameters, such as slice thickness and convolution kernel, significantly affect the quantification of hyperaerated parenchyma (V(HYPER)%). The aim of this study was to investigate the mathematical relation between V(HYPER)% calculated at different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ball, Lorenzo, Brusasco, Claudia, Corradi, Francesco, Paparo, Francesco, Garlaschi, Alessandro, Herrmann, Peter, Quintel, Michael, Pelosi, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27553378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0232-z
_version_ 1782449542044581888
author Ball, Lorenzo
Brusasco, Claudia
Corradi, Francesco
Paparo, Francesco
Garlaschi, Alessandro
Herrmann, Peter
Quintel, Michael
Pelosi, Paolo
author_facet Ball, Lorenzo
Brusasco, Claudia
Corradi, Francesco
Paparo, Francesco
Garlaschi, Alessandro
Herrmann, Peter
Quintel, Michael
Pelosi, Paolo
author_sort Ball, Lorenzo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) reconstruction parameters, such as slice thickness and convolution kernel, significantly affect the quantification of hyperaerated parenchyma (V(HYPER)%). The aim of this study was to investigate the mathematical relation between V(HYPER)% calculated at different reconstruction settings, in mechanically ventilated and spontaneously breathing patients with different lung pathology. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, CT scans of patients of the intensive care unit and emergency department were collected from two CT scanners and analysed with different kernel-thickness combinations (reconstructions): 1.25 mm soft kernel, 5 mm soft kernel, 5 mm sharp kernel in the first scanner; 2.5 mm slice thickness with a smooth (B41s) and a sharp (B70s) kernel on the second scanner. A quantitative analysis was performed with Maluna® to assess lung aeration compartments as percent of total lung volume. CT variables calculated with different reconstructions were compared in pairs, and their mathematical relationship was analysed by using quadratic and power functions. RESULTS: 43 subjects were included in the present analysis. Image reconstruction parameters influenced all the quantitative CT-derived variables. The most relevant changes occurred in the hyperaerated and normally aerated volume compartments. The application of a power correction formula led to a significant reduction in the bias between V(HYPER)% estimations (p < 0.001 in all cases). The bias in V(HYPER)% assessment did not differ between lung pathology nor ventilation mode groups (p > 0.15 in all cases). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperaerated percent volume at different reconstruction settings can be described by a fixed mathematical relationship, independent of lung pathology, ventilation mode, and type of CT scanner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4995787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49957872016-08-25 Lung hyperaeration assessment by computed tomography: correction of reconstruction-induced bias Ball, Lorenzo Brusasco, Claudia Corradi, Francesco Paparo, Francesco Garlaschi, Alessandro Herrmann, Peter Quintel, Michael Pelosi, Paolo BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) reconstruction parameters, such as slice thickness and convolution kernel, significantly affect the quantification of hyperaerated parenchyma (V(HYPER)%). The aim of this study was to investigate the mathematical relation between V(HYPER)% calculated at different reconstruction settings, in mechanically ventilated and spontaneously breathing patients with different lung pathology. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, CT scans of patients of the intensive care unit and emergency department were collected from two CT scanners and analysed with different kernel-thickness combinations (reconstructions): 1.25 mm soft kernel, 5 mm soft kernel, 5 mm sharp kernel in the first scanner; 2.5 mm slice thickness with a smooth (B41s) and a sharp (B70s) kernel on the second scanner. A quantitative analysis was performed with Maluna® to assess lung aeration compartments as percent of total lung volume. CT variables calculated with different reconstructions were compared in pairs, and their mathematical relationship was analysed by using quadratic and power functions. RESULTS: 43 subjects were included in the present analysis. Image reconstruction parameters influenced all the quantitative CT-derived variables. The most relevant changes occurred in the hyperaerated and normally aerated volume compartments. The application of a power correction formula led to a significant reduction in the bias between V(HYPER)% estimations (p < 0.001 in all cases). The bias in V(HYPER)% assessment did not differ between lung pathology nor ventilation mode groups (p > 0.15 in all cases). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperaerated percent volume at different reconstruction settings can be described by a fixed mathematical relationship, independent of lung pathology, ventilation mode, and type of CT scanner. BioMed Central 2016-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4995787/ /pubmed/27553378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0232-z Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ball, Lorenzo
Brusasco, Claudia
Corradi, Francesco
Paparo, Francesco
Garlaschi, Alessandro
Herrmann, Peter
Quintel, Michael
Pelosi, Paolo
Lung hyperaeration assessment by computed tomography: correction of reconstruction-induced bias
title Lung hyperaeration assessment by computed tomography: correction of reconstruction-induced bias
title_full Lung hyperaeration assessment by computed tomography: correction of reconstruction-induced bias
title_fullStr Lung hyperaeration assessment by computed tomography: correction of reconstruction-induced bias
title_full_unstemmed Lung hyperaeration assessment by computed tomography: correction of reconstruction-induced bias
title_short Lung hyperaeration assessment by computed tomography: correction of reconstruction-induced bias
title_sort lung hyperaeration assessment by computed tomography: correction of reconstruction-induced bias
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4995787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27553378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0232-z
work_keys_str_mv AT balllorenzo lunghyperaerationassessmentbycomputedtomographycorrectionofreconstructioninducedbias
AT brusascoclaudia lunghyperaerationassessmentbycomputedtomographycorrectionofreconstructioninducedbias
AT corradifrancesco lunghyperaerationassessmentbycomputedtomographycorrectionofreconstructioninducedbias
AT paparofrancesco lunghyperaerationassessmentbycomputedtomographycorrectionofreconstructioninducedbias
AT garlaschialessandro lunghyperaerationassessmentbycomputedtomographycorrectionofreconstructioninducedbias
AT herrmannpeter lunghyperaerationassessmentbycomputedtomographycorrectionofreconstructioninducedbias
AT quintelmichael lunghyperaerationassessmentbycomputedtomographycorrectionofreconstructioninducedbias
AT pelosipaolo lunghyperaerationassessmentbycomputedtomographycorrectionofreconstructioninducedbias