Cargando…
Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions
BACKGROUND: Early interventions are recognised as key to improving life chances for children and reducing inequalities in health and well-being, however there is a paucity of high quality research into the effectiveness of interventions to address childhood health and development outcomes. Planning...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4996273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0 |
_version_ | 1782449584340992000 |
---|---|
author | Dickerson, Josie Bird, Philippa K. McEachan, Rosemary R. C. Pickett, Kate E. Waiblinger, Dagmar Uphoff, Eleonora Mason, Dan Bryant, Maria Bywater, Tracey Bowyer-Crane, Claudine Sahota, Pinki Small, Neil Howell, Michaela Thornton, Gill Astin, Melanie Lawlor, Debbie A. Wright, John |
author_facet | Dickerson, Josie Bird, Philippa K. McEachan, Rosemary R. C. Pickett, Kate E. Waiblinger, Dagmar Uphoff, Eleonora Mason, Dan Bryant, Maria Bywater, Tracey Bowyer-Crane, Claudine Sahota, Pinki Small, Neil Howell, Michaela Thornton, Gill Astin, Melanie Lawlor, Debbie A. Wright, John |
author_sort | Dickerson, Josie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early interventions are recognised as key to improving life chances for children and reducing inequalities in health and well-being, however there is a paucity of high quality research into the effectiveness of interventions to address childhood health and development outcomes. Planning and implementing standalone RCTs for multiple, individual interventions would be slow, cumbersome and expensive. This paper describes the protocol for an innovative experimental birth cohort: Born in Bradford’s Better Start (BiBBS) that will simultaneously evaluate the impact of multiple early life interventions using efficient study designs. Better Start Bradford (BSB) has been allocated £49 million from the Big Lottery Fund to implement 22 interventions to improve outcomes for children aged 0–3 in three key areas: social and emotional development; communication and language development; and nutrition and obesity. The interventions will be implemented in three deprived and ethnically diverse inner city areas of Bradford. METHOD: The BiBBS study aims to recruit 5000 babies, their mothers and their mothers’ partners over 5 years from January 2016-December 2020. Demographic and socioeconomic information, physical and mental health, lifestyle factors and biological samples will be collected during pregnancy. Parents and children will be linked to their routine health and local authority (including education) data throughout the children’s lives. Their participation in BSB interventions will also be tracked. BiBBS will test interventions using the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) approach and other quasi-experimental designs where TwiCs are neither feasible nor ethical, to evaluate these early life interventions. The effects of single interventions, and the cumulative effects of stacked (multiple) interventions on health and social outcomes during the critical early years will be measured. DISCUSSION: The focus of the BiBBS cohort is on intervention impact rather than observation. As far as we are aware BiBBS is the world’s first such experimental birth cohort study. While some risk factors for adverse health and social outcomes are increasingly well described, the solutions to tackling them remain elusive. The novel design of BiBBS can contribute much needed evidence to inform policy makers and practitioners about effective approaches to improve health and well-being for future generations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4996273 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49962732016-08-25 Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions Dickerson, Josie Bird, Philippa K. McEachan, Rosemary R. C. Pickett, Kate E. Waiblinger, Dagmar Uphoff, Eleonora Mason, Dan Bryant, Maria Bywater, Tracey Bowyer-Crane, Claudine Sahota, Pinki Small, Neil Howell, Michaela Thornton, Gill Astin, Melanie Lawlor, Debbie A. Wright, John BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Early interventions are recognised as key to improving life chances for children and reducing inequalities in health and well-being, however there is a paucity of high quality research into the effectiveness of interventions to address childhood health and development outcomes. Planning and implementing standalone RCTs for multiple, individual interventions would be slow, cumbersome and expensive. This paper describes the protocol for an innovative experimental birth cohort: Born in Bradford’s Better Start (BiBBS) that will simultaneously evaluate the impact of multiple early life interventions using efficient study designs. Better Start Bradford (BSB) has been allocated £49 million from the Big Lottery Fund to implement 22 interventions to improve outcomes for children aged 0–3 in three key areas: social and emotional development; communication and language development; and nutrition and obesity. The interventions will be implemented in three deprived and ethnically diverse inner city areas of Bradford. METHOD: The BiBBS study aims to recruit 5000 babies, their mothers and their mothers’ partners over 5 years from January 2016-December 2020. Demographic and socioeconomic information, physical and mental health, lifestyle factors and biological samples will be collected during pregnancy. Parents and children will be linked to their routine health and local authority (including education) data throughout the children’s lives. Their participation in BSB interventions will also be tracked. BiBBS will test interventions using the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) approach and other quasi-experimental designs where TwiCs are neither feasible nor ethical, to evaluate these early life interventions. The effects of single interventions, and the cumulative effects of stacked (multiple) interventions on health and social outcomes during the critical early years will be measured. DISCUSSION: The focus of the BiBBS cohort is on intervention impact rather than observation. As far as we are aware BiBBS is the world’s first such experimental birth cohort study. While some risk factors for adverse health and social outcomes are increasingly well described, the solutions to tackling them remain elusive. The novel design of BiBBS can contribute much needed evidence to inform policy makers and practitioners about effective approaches to improve health and well-being for future generations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4996273/ /pubmed/27488369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Dickerson, Josie Bird, Philippa K. McEachan, Rosemary R. C. Pickett, Kate E. Waiblinger, Dagmar Uphoff, Eleonora Mason, Dan Bryant, Maria Bywater, Tracey Bowyer-Crane, Claudine Sahota, Pinki Small, Neil Howell, Michaela Thornton, Gill Astin, Melanie Lawlor, Debbie A. Wright, John Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions |
title | Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions |
title_full | Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions |
title_fullStr | Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions |
title_short | Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions |
title_sort | born in bradford’s better start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4996273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dickersonjosie borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT birdphilippak borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT mceachanrosemaryrc borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT pickettkatee borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT waiblingerdagmar borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT uphoffeleonora borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT masondan borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT bryantmaria borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT bywatertracey borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT bowyercraneclaudine borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT sahotapinki borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT smallneil borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT howellmichaela borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT thorntongill borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT astinmelanie borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT lawlordebbiea borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions AT wrightjohn borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions |