Cargando…

Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions

BACKGROUND: Early interventions are recognised as key to improving life chances for children and reducing inequalities in health and well-being, however there is a paucity of high quality research into the effectiveness of interventions to address childhood health and development outcomes. Planning...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickerson, Josie, Bird, Philippa K., McEachan, Rosemary R. C., Pickett, Kate E., Waiblinger, Dagmar, Uphoff, Eleonora, Mason, Dan, Bryant, Maria, Bywater, Tracey, Bowyer-Crane, Claudine, Sahota, Pinki, Small, Neil, Howell, Michaela, Thornton, Gill, Astin, Melanie, Lawlor, Debbie A., Wright, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4996273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0
_version_ 1782449584340992000
author Dickerson, Josie
Bird, Philippa K.
McEachan, Rosemary R. C.
Pickett, Kate E.
Waiblinger, Dagmar
Uphoff, Eleonora
Mason, Dan
Bryant, Maria
Bywater, Tracey
Bowyer-Crane, Claudine
Sahota, Pinki
Small, Neil
Howell, Michaela
Thornton, Gill
Astin, Melanie
Lawlor, Debbie A.
Wright, John
author_facet Dickerson, Josie
Bird, Philippa K.
McEachan, Rosemary R. C.
Pickett, Kate E.
Waiblinger, Dagmar
Uphoff, Eleonora
Mason, Dan
Bryant, Maria
Bywater, Tracey
Bowyer-Crane, Claudine
Sahota, Pinki
Small, Neil
Howell, Michaela
Thornton, Gill
Astin, Melanie
Lawlor, Debbie A.
Wright, John
author_sort Dickerson, Josie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early interventions are recognised as key to improving life chances for children and reducing inequalities in health and well-being, however there is a paucity of high quality research into the effectiveness of interventions to address childhood health and development outcomes. Planning and implementing standalone RCTs for multiple, individual interventions would be slow, cumbersome and expensive. This paper describes the protocol for an innovative experimental birth cohort: Born in Bradford’s Better Start (BiBBS) that will simultaneously evaluate the impact of multiple early life interventions using efficient study designs. Better Start Bradford (BSB) has been allocated £49 million from the Big Lottery Fund to implement 22 interventions to improve outcomes for children aged 0–3 in three key areas: social and emotional development; communication and language development; and nutrition and obesity. The interventions will be implemented in three deprived and ethnically diverse inner city areas of Bradford. METHOD: The BiBBS study aims to recruit 5000 babies, their mothers and their mothers’ partners over 5 years from January 2016-December 2020. Demographic and socioeconomic information, physical and mental health, lifestyle factors and biological samples will be collected during pregnancy. Parents and children will be linked to their routine health and local authority (including education) data throughout the children’s lives. Their participation in BSB interventions will also be tracked. BiBBS will test interventions using the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) approach and other quasi-experimental designs where TwiCs are neither feasible nor ethical, to evaluate these early life interventions. The effects of single interventions, and the cumulative effects of stacked (multiple) interventions on health and social outcomes during the critical early years will be measured. DISCUSSION: The focus of the BiBBS cohort is on intervention impact rather than observation. As far as we are aware BiBBS is the world’s first such experimental birth cohort study. While some risk factors for adverse health and social outcomes are increasingly well described, the solutions to tackling them remain elusive. The novel design of BiBBS can contribute much needed evidence to inform policy makers and practitioners about effective approaches to improve health and well-being for future generations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4996273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49962732016-08-25 Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions Dickerson, Josie Bird, Philippa K. McEachan, Rosemary R. C. Pickett, Kate E. Waiblinger, Dagmar Uphoff, Eleonora Mason, Dan Bryant, Maria Bywater, Tracey Bowyer-Crane, Claudine Sahota, Pinki Small, Neil Howell, Michaela Thornton, Gill Astin, Melanie Lawlor, Debbie A. Wright, John BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Early interventions are recognised as key to improving life chances for children and reducing inequalities in health and well-being, however there is a paucity of high quality research into the effectiveness of interventions to address childhood health and development outcomes. Planning and implementing standalone RCTs for multiple, individual interventions would be slow, cumbersome and expensive. This paper describes the protocol for an innovative experimental birth cohort: Born in Bradford’s Better Start (BiBBS) that will simultaneously evaluate the impact of multiple early life interventions using efficient study designs. Better Start Bradford (BSB) has been allocated £49 million from the Big Lottery Fund to implement 22 interventions to improve outcomes for children aged 0–3 in three key areas: social and emotional development; communication and language development; and nutrition and obesity. The interventions will be implemented in three deprived and ethnically diverse inner city areas of Bradford. METHOD: The BiBBS study aims to recruit 5000 babies, their mothers and their mothers’ partners over 5 years from January 2016-December 2020. Demographic and socioeconomic information, physical and mental health, lifestyle factors and biological samples will be collected during pregnancy. Parents and children will be linked to their routine health and local authority (including education) data throughout the children’s lives. Their participation in BSB interventions will also be tracked. BiBBS will test interventions using the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) approach and other quasi-experimental designs where TwiCs are neither feasible nor ethical, to evaluate these early life interventions. The effects of single interventions, and the cumulative effects of stacked (multiple) interventions on health and social outcomes during the critical early years will be measured. DISCUSSION: The focus of the BiBBS cohort is on intervention impact rather than observation. As far as we are aware BiBBS is the world’s first such experimental birth cohort study. While some risk factors for adverse health and social outcomes are increasingly well described, the solutions to tackling them remain elusive. The novel design of BiBBS can contribute much needed evidence to inform policy makers and practitioners about effective approaches to improve health and well-being for future generations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4996273/ /pubmed/27488369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Dickerson, Josie
Bird, Philippa K.
McEachan, Rosemary R. C.
Pickett, Kate E.
Waiblinger, Dagmar
Uphoff, Eleonora
Mason, Dan
Bryant, Maria
Bywater, Tracey
Bowyer-Crane, Claudine
Sahota, Pinki
Small, Neil
Howell, Michaela
Thornton, Gill
Astin, Melanie
Lawlor, Debbie A.
Wright, John
Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions
title Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions
title_full Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions
title_fullStr Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions
title_full_unstemmed Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions
title_short Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions
title_sort born in bradford’s better start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4996273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0
work_keys_str_mv AT dickersonjosie borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT birdphilippak borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT mceachanrosemaryrc borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT pickettkatee borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT waiblingerdagmar borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT uphoffeleonora borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT masondan borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT bryantmaria borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT bywatertracey borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT bowyercraneclaudine borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT sahotapinki borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT smallneil borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT howellmichaela borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT thorntongill borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT astinmelanie borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT lawlordebbiea borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions
AT wrightjohn borninbradfordsbetterstartanexperimentalbirthcohortstudytoevaluatetheimpactofearlylifeinterventions