Cargando…
Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies
New minimal invasive diagnostic methods for early detection of lung cancer are urgently needed. It is known that the immune system responds to tumors with production of tumor-autoantibodies. Protein microarrays are a suitable highly multiplexed platform for identification of autoantibody signatures...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4996396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27600218 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microarrays4020162 |
_version_ | 1782449595357331456 |
---|---|
author | Brezina, Stefanie Soldo, Regina Kreuzhuber, Roman Hofer, Philipp Gsur, Andrea Weinhaeusel, Andreas |
author_facet | Brezina, Stefanie Soldo, Regina Kreuzhuber, Roman Hofer, Philipp Gsur, Andrea Weinhaeusel, Andreas |
author_sort | Brezina, Stefanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | New minimal invasive diagnostic methods for early detection of lung cancer are urgently needed. It is known that the immune system responds to tumors with production of tumor-autoantibodies. Protein microarrays are a suitable highly multiplexed platform for identification of autoantibody signatures against tumor-associated antigens (TAA). These microarrays can be probed using 0.1 mg immunoglobulin G (IgG), purified from 10 µL of plasma. We used a microarray comprising recombinant proteins derived from 15,417 cDNA clones for the screening of 100 lung cancer samples, including 25 samples of each main histological entity of lung cancer, and 100 controls. Since this number of samples cannot be processed at once, the resulting data showed non-biological variances due to “batch effects”. Our aim was to evaluate quantile normalization, “distance-weighted discrimination” (DWD), and “ComBat” for their effectiveness in data pre-processing for elucidating diagnostic immune-signatures. “ComBat” data adjustment outperformed the other methods and allowed us to identify classifiers for all lung cancer cases versus controls and small-cell, squamous cell, large-cell, and adenocarcinoma of the lung with an accuracy of 85%, 94%, 96%, 92%, and 83% (sensitivity of 0.85, 0.92, 0.96, 0.88, 0.83; specificity of 0.85, 0.96, 0.96, 0.96, 0.83), respectively. These promising data would be the basis for further validation using targeted autoantibody tests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4996396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49963962016-09-06 Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies Brezina, Stefanie Soldo, Regina Kreuzhuber, Roman Hofer, Philipp Gsur, Andrea Weinhaeusel, Andreas Microarrays (Basel) Article New minimal invasive diagnostic methods for early detection of lung cancer are urgently needed. It is known that the immune system responds to tumors with production of tumor-autoantibodies. Protein microarrays are a suitable highly multiplexed platform for identification of autoantibody signatures against tumor-associated antigens (TAA). These microarrays can be probed using 0.1 mg immunoglobulin G (IgG), purified from 10 µL of plasma. We used a microarray comprising recombinant proteins derived from 15,417 cDNA clones for the screening of 100 lung cancer samples, including 25 samples of each main histological entity of lung cancer, and 100 controls. Since this number of samples cannot be processed at once, the resulting data showed non-biological variances due to “batch effects”. Our aim was to evaluate quantile normalization, “distance-weighted discrimination” (DWD), and “ComBat” for their effectiveness in data pre-processing for elucidating diagnostic immune-signatures. “ComBat” data adjustment outperformed the other methods and allowed us to identify classifiers for all lung cancer cases versus controls and small-cell, squamous cell, large-cell, and adenocarcinoma of the lung with an accuracy of 85%, 94%, 96%, 92%, and 83% (sensitivity of 0.85, 0.92, 0.96, 0.88, 0.83; specificity of 0.85, 0.96, 0.96, 0.96, 0.83), respectively. These promising data would be the basis for further validation using targeted autoantibody tests. MDPI 2015-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4996396/ /pubmed/27600218 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microarrays4020162 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Brezina, Stefanie Soldo, Regina Kreuzhuber, Roman Hofer, Philipp Gsur, Andrea Weinhaeusel, Andreas Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies |
title | Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies |
title_full | Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies |
title_fullStr | Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies |
title_short | Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies |
title_sort | immune-signatures for lung cancer diagnostics: evaluation of protein microarray data normalization strategies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4996396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27600218 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microarrays4020162 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brezinastefanie immunesignaturesforlungcancerdiagnosticsevaluationofproteinmicroarraydatanormalizationstrategies AT soldoregina immunesignaturesforlungcancerdiagnosticsevaluationofproteinmicroarraydatanormalizationstrategies AT kreuzhuberroman immunesignaturesforlungcancerdiagnosticsevaluationofproteinmicroarraydatanormalizationstrategies AT hoferphilipp immunesignaturesforlungcancerdiagnosticsevaluationofproteinmicroarraydatanormalizationstrategies AT gsurandrea immunesignaturesforlungcancerdiagnosticsevaluationofproteinmicroarraydatanormalizationstrategies AT weinhaeuselandreas immunesignaturesforlungcancerdiagnosticsevaluationofproteinmicroarraydatanormalizationstrategies |