Cargando…

Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies

New minimal invasive diagnostic methods for early detection of lung cancer are urgently needed. It is known that the immune system responds to tumors with production of tumor-autoantibodies. Protein microarrays are a suitable highly multiplexed platform for identification of autoantibody signatures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brezina, Stefanie, Soldo, Regina, Kreuzhuber, Roman, Hofer, Philipp, Gsur, Andrea, Weinhaeusel, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4996396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27600218
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microarrays4020162
_version_ 1782449595357331456
author Brezina, Stefanie
Soldo, Regina
Kreuzhuber, Roman
Hofer, Philipp
Gsur, Andrea
Weinhaeusel, Andreas
author_facet Brezina, Stefanie
Soldo, Regina
Kreuzhuber, Roman
Hofer, Philipp
Gsur, Andrea
Weinhaeusel, Andreas
author_sort Brezina, Stefanie
collection PubMed
description New minimal invasive diagnostic methods for early detection of lung cancer are urgently needed. It is known that the immune system responds to tumors with production of tumor-autoantibodies. Protein microarrays are a suitable highly multiplexed platform for identification of autoantibody signatures against tumor-associated antigens (TAA). These microarrays can be probed using 0.1 mg immunoglobulin G (IgG), purified from 10 µL of plasma. We used a microarray comprising recombinant proteins derived from 15,417 cDNA clones for the screening of 100 lung cancer samples, including 25 samples of each main histological entity of lung cancer, and 100 controls. Since this number of samples cannot be processed at once, the resulting data showed non-biological variances due to “batch effects”. Our aim was to evaluate quantile normalization, “distance-weighted discrimination” (DWD), and “ComBat” for their effectiveness in data pre-processing for elucidating diagnostic immune-signatures. “ComBat” data adjustment outperformed the other methods and allowed us to identify classifiers for all lung cancer cases versus controls and small-cell, squamous cell, large-cell, and adenocarcinoma of the lung with an accuracy of 85%, 94%, 96%, 92%, and 83% (sensitivity of 0.85, 0.92, 0.96, 0.88, 0.83; specificity of 0.85, 0.96, 0.96, 0.96, 0.83), respectively. These promising data would be the basis for further validation using targeted autoantibody tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4996396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49963962016-09-06 Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies Brezina, Stefanie Soldo, Regina Kreuzhuber, Roman Hofer, Philipp Gsur, Andrea Weinhaeusel, Andreas Microarrays (Basel) Article New minimal invasive diagnostic methods for early detection of lung cancer are urgently needed. It is known that the immune system responds to tumors with production of tumor-autoantibodies. Protein microarrays are a suitable highly multiplexed platform for identification of autoantibody signatures against tumor-associated antigens (TAA). These microarrays can be probed using 0.1 mg immunoglobulin G (IgG), purified from 10 µL of plasma. We used a microarray comprising recombinant proteins derived from 15,417 cDNA clones for the screening of 100 lung cancer samples, including 25 samples of each main histological entity of lung cancer, and 100 controls. Since this number of samples cannot be processed at once, the resulting data showed non-biological variances due to “batch effects”. Our aim was to evaluate quantile normalization, “distance-weighted discrimination” (DWD), and “ComBat” for their effectiveness in data pre-processing for elucidating diagnostic immune-signatures. “ComBat” data adjustment outperformed the other methods and allowed us to identify classifiers for all lung cancer cases versus controls and small-cell, squamous cell, large-cell, and adenocarcinoma of the lung with an accuracy of 85%, 94%, 96%, 92%, and 83% (sensitivity of 0.85, 0.92, 0.96, 0.88, 0.83; specificity of 0.85, 0.96, 0.96, 0.96, 0.83), respectively. These promising data would be the basis for further validation using targeted autoantibody tests. MDPI 2015-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4996396/ /pubmed/27600218 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microarrays4020162 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Brezina, Stefanie
Soldo, Regina
Kreuzhuber, Roman
Hofer, Philipp
Gsur, Andrea
Weinhaeusel, Andreas
Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies
title Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies
title_full Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies
title_fullStr Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies
title_full_unstemmed Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies
title_short Immune-Signatures for Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Evaluation of Protein Microarray Data Normalization Strategies
title_sort immune-signatures for lung cancer diagnostics: evaluation of protein microarray data normalization strategies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4996396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27600218
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microarrays4020162
work_keys_str_mv AT brezinastefanie immunesignaturesforlungcancerdiagnosticsevaluationofproteinmicroarraydatanormalizationstrategies
AT soldoregina immunesignaturesforlungcancerdiagnosticsevaluationofproteinmicroarraydatanormalizationstrategies
AT kreuzhuberroman immunesignaturesforlungcancerdiagnosticsevaluationofproteinmicroarraydatanormalizationstrategies
AT hoferphilipp immunesignaturesforlungcancerdiagnosticsevaluationofproteinmicroarraydatanormalizationstrategies
AT gsurandrea immunesignaturesforlungcancerdiagnosticsevaluationofproteinmicroarraydatanormalizationstrategies
AT weinhaeuselandreas immunesignaturesforlungcancerdiagnosticsevaluationofproteinmicroarraydatanormalizationstrategies