Cargando…

A Longitudinal Study of the Predictors of Perceived Procedural Justice in Australian University Staff

Purpose: This study examined the factors that predict employees' perceptions of procedural justice in university settings. The paper also reviews the ethical aspects of justice and psychological contracts within employment relationships. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study examined the predi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pignata, Silvia, Winefield, Anthony H., Provis, Chris, Boyd, Carolyn M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27610093
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01271
_version_ 1782449706384752640
author Pignata, Silvia
Winefield, Anthony H.
Provis, Chris
Boyd, Carolyn M.
author_facet Pignata, Silvia
Winefield, Anthony H.
Provis, Chris
Boyd, Carolyn M.
author_sort Pignata, Silvia
collection PubMed
description Purpose: This study examined the factors that predict employees' perceptions of procedural justice in university settings. The paper also reviews the ethical aspects of justice and psychological contracts within employment relationships. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study examined the predictors of perceived procedural justice in a two-wave longitudinal sample of 945 employees from 13 universities by applying the Job Demands-Resources theoretical model of stress. The proposed predictors were classified into two categories: Job demands of work pressure and work-home conflict; and job resources of job security, autonomy, trust in senior management, and trust in supervisor. The predictor model also examined job satisfaction and affective organizational commitment, demographic (age, gender, tenure, role) and individual characteristics (negative affectivity, job involvement) as well as Time 1 (T1) perceptions of procedural justice to ensure that tests were rigorous. Findings: A series of hierarchical multiple regression analyses found that job satisfaction at T1 was the strongest predictor of perceived procedural justice at Time 2. Employees' trust in senior management, and their length of tenure also positively predicted justice perceptions. There were also differences between academic and non-academic staff groups, as non-academic employees' level of job satisfaction, trust in senior management, and their length of organizational tenure predicted procedural justice perceptions, whereas for academics, only job satisfaction predicted perceived justice. For the “all staff” category, job satisfaction was a dominant and enduring predictor of justice, and employees' trust in senior management also predicted justice. Research limitations/implications: Results highlight the importance of workplace factors in enhancing fair procedures to encourage reciprocity from employees. As perceived procedural justice is also conceptually linked to the psychological contract between employees-employers, it is possible that employees' levels of job satisfaction and perceptions of trust in senior management, relative to other work attitudinal outcomes, may be more effective for improving the broader working environment, and promoting staff morale. Originality/value: This study adds to research on applied business ethics as it focuses on the ethical aspects of perceived procedural justice and highlights the importance of workplace factors in enhancing fair procedures in organizational policy to encourage reciprocity and promote healthy organizational environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4997092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49970922016-09-08 A Longitudinal Study of the Predictors of Perceived Procedural Justice in Australian University Staff Pignata, Silvia Winefield, Anthony H. Provis, Chris Boyd, Carolyn M. Front Psychol Psychology Purpose: This study examined the factors that predict employees' perceptions of procedural justice in university settings. The paper also reviews the ethical aspects of justice and psychological contracts within employment relationships. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study examined the predictors of perceived procedural justice in a two-wave longitudinal sample of 945 employees from 13 universities by applying the Job Demands-Resources theoretical model of stress. The proposed predictors were classified into two categories: Job demands of work pressure and work-home conflict; and job resources of job security, autonomy, trust in senior management, and trust in supervisor. The predictor model also examined job satisfaction and affective organizational commitment, demographic (age, gender, tenure, role) and individual characteristics (negative affectivity, job involvement) as well as Time 1 (T1) perceptions of procedural justice to ensure that tests were rigorous. Findings: A series of hierarchical multiple regression analyses found that job satisfaction at T1 was the strongest predictor of perceived procedural justice at Time 2. Employees' trust in senior management, and their length of tenure also positively predicted justice perceptions. There were also differences between academic and non-academic staff groups, as non-academic employees' level of job satisfaction, trust in senior management, and their length of organizational tenure predicted procedural justice perceptions, whereas for academics, only job satisfaction predicted perceived justice. For the “all staff” category, job satisfaction was a dominant and enduring predictor of justice, and employees' trust in senior management also predicted justice. Research limitations/implications: Results highlight the importance of workplace factors in enhancing fair procedures to encourage reciprocity from employees. As perceived procedural justice is also conceptually linked to the psychological contract between employees-employers, it is possible that employees' levels of job satisfaction and perceptions of trust in senior management, relative to other work attitudinal outcomes, may be more effective for improving the broader working environment, and promoting staff morale. Originality/value: This study adds to research on applied business ethics as it focuses on the ethical aspects of perceived procedural justice and highlights the importance of workplace factors in enhancing fair procedures in organizational policy to encourage reciprocity and promote healthy organizational environments. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4997092/ /pubmed/27610093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01271 Text en Copyright © 2016 Pignata, Winefield, Provis and Boyd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Pignata, Silvia
Winefield, Anthony H.
Provis, Chris
Boyd, Carolyn M.
A Longitudinal Study of the Predictors of Perceived Procedural Justice in Australian University Staff
title A Longitudinal Study of the Predictors of Perceived Procedural Justice in Australian University Staff
title_full A Longitudinal Study of the Predictors of Perceived Procedural Justice in Australian University Staff
title_fullStr A Longitudinal Study of the Predictors of Perceived Procedural Justice in Australian University Staff
title_full_unstemmed A Longitudinal Study of the Predictors of Perceived Procedural Justice in Australian University Staff
title_short A Longitudinal Study of the Predictors of Perceived Procedural Justice in Australian University Staff
title_sort longitudinal study of the predictors of perceived procedural justice in australian university staff
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27610093
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01271
work_keys_str_mv AT pignatasilvia alongitudinalstudyofthepredictorsofperceivedproceduraljusticeinaustralianuniversitystaff
AT winefieldanthonyh alongitudinalstudyofthepredictorsofperceivedproceduraljusticeinaustralianuniversitystaff
AT provischris alongitudinalstudyofthepredictorsofperceivedproceduraljusticeinaustralianuniversitystaff
AT boydcarolynm alongitudinalstudyofthepredictorsofperceivedproceduraljusticeinaustralianuniversitystaff
AT pignatasilvia longitudinalstudyofthepredictorsofperceivedproceduraljusticeinaustralianuniversitystaff
AT winefieldanthonyh longitudinalstudyofthepredictorsofperceivedproceduraljusticeinaustralianuniversitystaff
AT provischris longitudinalstudyofthepredictorsofperceivedproceduraljusticeinaustralianuniversitystaff
AT boydcarolynm longitudinalstudyofthepredictorsofperceivedproceduraljusticeinaustralianuniversitystaff