Cargando…

Evaluation of Low versus High Volume per Minute Displacement CO(2) Methods of Euthanasia in the Induction and Duration of Panic-Associated Behavior and Physiology

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Current recommendations for the use of CO(2) as a euthanasia agent for rats require the use of gradual fill methods in order to render the animal insensible prior to their experience of pain. However, there is concern that the use of these gradual fill methods may increase the distre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hickman, Debra L., Fitz, Stephanie D., Bernabe, Cristian S., Caliman, Izabela F., Haulcomb, Melissa M., Federici, Lauren M., Shekhar, Anantha, Johnson, Philip L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27490573
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani6080045
_version_ 1782449741667237888
author Hickman, Debra L.
Fitz, Stephanie D.
Bernabe, Cristian S.
Caliman, Izabela F.
Haulcomb, Melissa M.
Federici, Lauren M.
Shekhar, Anantha
Johnson, Philip L.
author_facet Hickman, Debra L.
Fitz, Stephanie D.
Bernabe, Cristian S.
Caliman, Izabela F.
Haulcomb, Melissa M.
Federici, Lauren M.
Shekhar, Anantha
Johnson, Philip L.
author_sort Hickman, Debra L.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Current recommendations for the use of CO(2) as a euthanasia agent for rats require the use of gradual fill methods in order to render the animal insensible prior to their experience of pain. However, there is concern that the use of these gradual fill methods may increase the distress experienced by these animals. We evaluated social and anxiety behavior of rats that had been exposed to concentrations of CO(2) that did not cause a loss of consciousness. We also evaluated the physiologic changes of rats that were euthanized with gradual fill protocols as compared to rapid fill methods. We found that rats exposed to concentrations of CO(2) that did not cause a loss of consciousness did exhibit increased anxiety and decreased social behavior. We also found that the use of a 10% volume per minute displacement rate of CO(2) resulted in physiologic and behavioral changes suggestive of distress. ABSTRACT: Current recommendations for the use of CO(2) as a euthanasia agent for rats require the use of gradual fill protocols (such as 10% to 30% volume displacement per minute) in order to render the animal insensible prior to exposure to levels of CO(2) that are associated with pain. However, exposing rats to CO(2), concentrations as low as 7% CO(2) are reported to cause distress and 10%–20% CO(2) induces panic-associated behavior and physiology, but loss of consciousness does not occur until CO(2) concentrations are at least 40%. This suggests that the use of the currently recommended low flow volume per minute displacement rates create a situation where rats are exposed to concentrations of CO(2) that induce anxiety, panic, and distress for prolonged periods of time. This study first characterized the response of male rats exposed to normoxic 20% CO(2) for a prolonged period of time as compared to room air controls. It demonstrated that rats exposed to this experimental condition displayed clinical signs consistent with significantly increased panic-associated behavior and physiology during CO(2) exposure. When atmospheric air was then again delivered, there was a robust increase in respiration rate that coincided with rats moving to the air intake. The rats exposed to CO(2) also displayed behaviors consistent with increased anxiety in the behavioral testing that followed the exposure. Next, this study assessed the behavioral and physiologic responses of rats that were euthanized with 100% CO(2) infused at 10%, 30%, or 100% volume per minute displacement rates. Analysis of the concentrations of CO(2) and oxygen in the euthanasia chamber and the behavioral responses of the rats suggest that the use of the very low flow volume per minute displacement rate (10%) may prolong the duration of panicogenic ranges of ambient CO(2), while the use of the higher flow volume per minute displacement rate (100%) increases agitation. Therefore, of the volume displacement per minute rates evaluated, this study suggests that 30% minimizes the potential pain and distress experienced by the animal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4997270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49972702016-08-26 Evaluation of Low versus High Volume per Minute Displacement CO(2) Methods of Euthanasia in the Induction and Duration of Panic-Associated Behavior and Physiology Hickman, Debra L. Fitz, Stephanie D. Bernabe, Cristian S. Caliman, Izabela F. Haulcomb, Melissa M. Federici, Lauren M. Shekhar, Anantha Johnson, Philip L. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Current recommendations for the use of CO(2) as a euthanasia agent for rats require the use of gradual fill methods in order to render the animal insensible prior to their experience of pain. However, there is concern that the use of these gradual fill methods may increase the distress experienced by these animals. We evaluated social and anxiety behavior of rats that had been exposed to concentrations of CO(2) that did not cause a loss of consciousness. We also evaluated the physiologic changes of rats that were euthanized with gradual fill protocols as compared to rapid fill methods. We found that rats exposed to concentrations of CO(2) that did not cause a loss of consciousness did exhibit increased anxiety and decreased social behavior. We also found that the use of a 10% volume per minute displacement rate of CO(2) resulted in physiologic and behavioral changes suggestive of distress. ABSTRACT: Current recommendations for the use of CO(2) as a euthanasia agent for rats require the use of gradual fill protocols (such as 10% to 30% volume displacement per minute) in order to render the animal insensible prior to exposure to levels of CO(2) that are associated with pain. However, exposing rats to CO(2), concentrations as low as 7% CO(2) are reported to cause distress and 10%–20% CO(2) induces panic-associated behavior and physiology, but loss of consciousness does not occur until CO(2) concentrations are at least 40%. This suggests that the use of the currently recommended low flow volume per minute displacement rates create a situation where rats are exposed to concentrations of CO(2) that induce anxiety, panic, and distress for prolonged periods of time. This study first characterized the response of male rats exposed to normoxic 20% CO(2) for a prolonged period of time as compared to room air controls. It demonstrated that rats exposed to this experimental condition displayed clinical signs consistent with significantly increased panic-associated behavior and physiology during CO(2) exposure. When atmospheric air was then again delivered, there was a robust increase in respiration rate that coincided with rats moving to the air intake. The rats exposed to CO(2) also displayed behaviors consistent with increased anxiety in the behavioral testing that followed the exposure. Next, this study assessed the behavioral and physiologic responses of rats that were euthanized with 100% CO(2) infused at 10%, 30%, or 100% volume per minute displacement rates. Analysis of the concentrations of CO(2) and oxygen in the euthanasia chamber and the behavioral responses of the rats suggest that the use of the very low flow volume per minute displacement rate (10%) may prolong the duration of panicogenic ranges of ambient CO(2), while the use of the higher flow volume per minute displacement rate (100%) increases agitation. Therefore, of the volume displacement per minute rates evaluated, this study suggests that 30% minimizes the potential pain and distress experienced by the animal. MDPI 2016-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4997270/ /pubmed/27490573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani6080045 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hickman, Debra L.
Fitz, Stephanie D.
Bernabe, Cristian S.
Caliman, Izabela F.
Haulcomb, Melissa M.
Federici, Lauren M.
Shekhar, Anantha
Johnson, Philip L.
Evaluation of Low versus High Volume per Minute Displacement CO(2) Methods of Euthanasia in the Induction and Duration of Panic-Associated Behavior and Physiology
title Evaluation of Low versus High Volume per Minute Displacement CO(2) Methods of Euthanasia in the Induction and Duration of Panic-Associated Behavior and Physiology
title_full Evaluation of Low versus High Volume per Minute Displacement CO(2) Methods of Euthanasia in the Induction and Duration of Panic-Associated Behavior and Physiology
title_fullStr Evaluation of Low versus High Volume per Minute Displacement CO(2) Methods of Euthanasia in the Induction and Duration of Panic-Associated Behavior and Physiology
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Low versus High Volume per Minute Displacement CO(2) Methods of Euthanasia in the Induction and Duration of Panic-Associated Behavior and Physiology
title_short Evaluation of Low versus High Volume per Minute Displacement CO(2) Methods of Euthanasia in the Induction and Duration of Panic-Associated Behavior and Physiology
title_sort evaluation of low versus high volume per minute displacement co(2) methods of euthanasia in the induction and duration of panic-associated behavior and physiology
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27490573
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani6080045
work_keys_str_mv AT hickmandebral evaluationoflowversushighvolumeperminutedisplacementco2methodsofeuthanasiaintheinductionanddurationofpanicassociatedbehaviorandphysiology
AT fitzstephanied evaluationoflowversushighvolumeperminutedisplacementco2methodsofeuthanasiaintheinductionanddurationofpanicassociatedbehaviorandphysiology
AT bernabecristians evaluationoflowversushighvolumeperminutedisplacementco2methodsofeuthanasiaintheinductionanddurationofpanicassociatedbehaviorandphysiology
AT calimanizabelaf evaluationoflowversushighvolumeperminutedisplacementco2methodsofeuthanasiaintheinductionanddurationofpanicassociatedbehaviorandphysiology
AT haulcombmelissam evaluationoflowversushighvolumeperminutedisplacementco2methodsofeuthanasiaintheinductionanddurationofpanicassociatedbehaviorandphysiology
AT federicilaurenm evaluationoflowversushighvolumeperminutedisplacementco2methodsofeuthanasiaintheinductionanddurationofpanicassociatedbehaviorandphysiology
AT shekharanantha evaluationoflowversushighvolumeperminutedisplacementco2methodsofeuthanasiaintheinductionanddurationofpanicassociatedbehaviorandphysiology
AT johnsonphilipl evaluationoflowversushighvolumeperminutedisplacementco2methodsofeuthanasiaintheinductionanddurationofpanicassociatedbehaviorandphysiology