Cargando…
A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development
Collecting human skin samples for medical research, including developing microneedle-based medical devices, is challenging and time-consuming. Researchers rely on human skin substitutes and skin preservation techniques, such as freezing, to overcome the lack of skin availability. Porcine skin is con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27558287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32074 |
_version_ | 1782449754210304000 |
---|---|
author | Ranamukhaarachchi, S. A. Lehnert, S. Ranamukhaarachchi, S. L. Sprenger, L. Schneider, T. Mansoor, I. Rai, K. Häfeli, U. O. Stoeber, B. |
author_facet | Ranamukhaarachchi, S. A. Lehnert, S. Ranamukhaarachchi, S. L. Sprenger, L. Schneider, T. Mansoor, I. Rai, K. Häfeli, U. O. Stoeber, B. |
author_sort | Ranamukhaarachchi, S. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Collecting human skin samples for medical research, including developing microneedle-based medical devices, is challenging and time-consuming. Researchers rely on human skin substitutes and skin preservation techniques, such as freezing, to overcome the lack of skin availability. Porcine skin is considered the best substitute to human skin, but their mechanical resemblance has not been fully validated. We provide a direct mechanical comparison between human and porcine skin samples using a conventional mechano-analytical technique (microindentation) and a medical application (microneedle insertion), at 35% and 100% relative humidity. Human and porcine skin samples were tested immediately after surgical excision from subjects, and after one freeze-thaw cycle at −80 °C to assess the impact of freezing on their mechanical properties. The mechanical properties of fresh human and porcine skin (especially of the stratum corneum) were found to be different for bulk measurements using microindentation; and both types of skin were mechanically affected by freezing. Localized in-plane mechanical properties of skin during microneedle insertion appeared to be more comparable between human and porcine skin samples than their bulk out-of-plane mechanical properties. The results from this study serve as a reference for future mechanical tests conducted with frozen human skin and/or porcine skin as a human skin substitute. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4997349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49973492016-09-01 A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development Ranamukhaarachchi, S. A. Lehnert, S. Ranamukhaarachchi, S. L. Sprenger, L. Schneider, T. Mansoor, I. Rai, K. Häfeli, U. O. Stoeber, B. Sci Rep Article Collecting human skin samples for medical research, including developing microneedle-based medical devices, is challenging and time-consuming. Researchers rely on human skin substitutes and skin preservation techniques, such as freezing, to overcome the lack of skin availability. Porcine skin is considered the best substitute to human skin, but their mechanical resemblance has not been fully validated. We provide a direct mechanical comparison between human and porcine skin samples using a conventional mechano-analytical technique (microindentation) and a medical application (microneedle insertion), at 35% and 100% relative humidity. Human and porcine skin samples were tested immediately after surgical excision from subjects, and after one freeze-thaw cycle at −80 °C to assess the impact of freezing on their mechanical properties. The mechanical properties of fresh human and porcine skin (especially of the stratum corneum) were found to be different for bulk measurements using microindentation; and both types of skin were mechanically affected by freezing. Localized in-plane mechanical properties of skin during microneedle insertion appeared to be more comparable between human and porcine skin samples than their bulk out-of-plane mechanical properties. The results from this study serve as a reference for future mechanical tests conducted with frozen human skin and/or porcine skin as a human skin substitute. Nature Publishing Group 2016-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4997349/ /pubmed/27558287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32074 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Ranamukhaarachchi, S. A. Lehnert, S. Ranamukhaarachchi, S. L. Sprenger, L. Schneider, T. Mansoor, I. Rai, K. Häfeli, U. O. Stoeber, B. A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development |
title | A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development |
title_full | A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development |
title_fullStr | A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development |
title_full_unstemmed | A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development |
title_short | A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development |
title_sort | micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27558287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32074 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ranamukhaarachchisa amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT lehnerts amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT ranamukhaarachchisl amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT sprengerl amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT schneidert amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT mansoori amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT raik amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT hafeliuo amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT stoeberb amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT ranamukhaarachchisa micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT lehnerts micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT ranamukhaarachchisl micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT sprengerl micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT schneidert micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT mansoori micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT raik micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT hafeliuo micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment AT stoeberb micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment |