Cargando…

A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development

Collecting human skin samples for medical research, including developing microneedle-based medical devices, is challenging and time-consuming. Researchers rely on human skin substitutes and skin preservation techniques, such as freezing, to overcome the lack of skin availability. Porcine skin is con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ranamukhaarachchi, S. A., Lehnert, S., Ranamukhaarachchi, S. L., Sprenger, L., Schneider, T., Mansoor, I., Rai, K., Häfeli, U. O., Stoeber, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27558287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32074
_version_ 1782449754210304000
author Ranamukhaarachchi, S. A.
Lehnert, S.
Ranamukhaarachchi, S. L.
Sprenger, L.
Schneider, T.
Mansoor, I.
Rai, K.
Häfeli, U. O.
Stoeber, B.
author_facet Ranamukhaarachchi, S. A.
Lehnert, S.
Ranamukhaarachchi, S. L.
Sprenger, L.
Schneider, T.
Mansoor, I.
Rai, K.
Häfeli, U. O.
Stoeber, B.
author_sort Ranamukhaarachchi, S. A.
collection PubMed
description Collecting human skin samples for medical research, including developing microneedle-based medical devices, is challenging and time-consuming. Researchers rely on human skin substitutes and skin preservation techniques, such as freezing, to overcome the lack of skin availability. Porcine skin is considered the best substitute to human skin, but their mechanical resemblance has not been fully validated. We provide a direct mechanical comparison between human and porcine skin samples using a conventional mechano-analytical technique (microindentation) and a medical application (microneedle insertion), at 35% and 100% relative humidity. Human and porcine skin samples were tested immediately after surgical excision from subjects, and after one freeze-thaw cycle at −80 °C to assess the impact of freezing on their mechanical properties. The mechanical properties of fresh human and porcine skin (especially of the stratum corneum) were found to be different for bulk measurements using microindentation; and both types of skin were mechanically affected by freezing. Localized in-plane mechanical properties of skin during microneedle insertion appeared to be more comparable between human and porcine skin samples than their bulk out-of-plane mechanical properties. The results from this study serve as a reference for future mechanical tests conducted with frozen human skin and/or porcine skin as a human skin substitute.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4997349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49973492016-09-01 A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development Ranamukhaarachchi, S. A. Lehnert, S. Ranamukhaarachchi, S. L. Sprenger, L. Schneider, T. Mansoor, I. Rai, K. Häfeli, U. O. Stoeber, B. Sci Rep Article Collecting human skin samples for medical research, including developing microneedle-based medical devices, is challenging and time-consuming. Researchers rely on human skin substitutes and skin preservation techniques, such as freezing, to overcome the lack of skin availability. Porcine skin is considered the best substitute to human skin, but their mechanical resemblance has not been fully validated. We provide a direct mechanical comparison between human and porcine skin samples using a conventional mechano-analytical technique (microindentation) and a medical application (microneedle insertion), at 35% and 100% relative humidity. Human and porcine skin samples were tested immediately after surgical excision from subjects, and after one freeze-thaw cycle at −80 °C to assess the impact of freezing on their mechanical properties. The mechanical properties of fresh human and porcine skin (especially of the stratum corneum) were found to be different for bulk measurements using microindentation; and both types of skin were mechanically affected by freezing. Localized in-plane mechanical properties of skin during microneedle insertion appeared to be more comparable between human and porcine skin samples than their bulk out-of-plane mechanical properties. The results from this study serve as a reference for future mechanical tests conducted with frozen human skin and/or porcine skin as a human skin substitute. Nature Publishing Group 2016-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4997349/ /pubmed/27558287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32074 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Ranamukhaarachchi, S. A.
Lehnert, S.
Ranamukhaarachchi, S. L.
Sprenger, L.
Schneider, T.
Mansoor, I.
Rai, K.
Häfeli, U. O.
Stoeber, B.
A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development
title A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development
title_full A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development
title_fullStr A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development
title_full_unstemmed A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development
title_short A micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development
title_sort micromechanical comparison of human and porcine skin before and after preservation by freezing for medical device development
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27558287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32074
work_keys_str_mv AT ranamukhaarachchisa amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT lehnerts amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT ranamukhaarachchisl amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT sprengerl amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT schneidert amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT mansoori amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT raik amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT hafeliuo amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT stoeberb amicromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT ranamukhaarachchisa micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT lehnerts micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT ranamukhaarachchisl micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT sprengerl micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT schneidert micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT mansoori micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT raik micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT hafeliuo micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment
AT stoeberb micromechanicalcomparisonofhumanandporcineskinbeforeandafterpreservationbyfreezingformedicaldevicedevelopment