Cargando…

Comparison of the Ability to Predict Mortality between the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Description of the anatomical severity of injuries in trauma patients is important. While the Injury Severity Score has been regarded as the “gold standard” since its creation, several studies have indicated that the New Injury Severity Score is better. Therefore, we aimed to systematica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Qiangyu, Tang, Bihan, Xue, Chen, Liu, Yuan, Liu, Xu, Lv, Yipeng, Zhang, Lulu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27537902
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080825
_version_ 1782449792250544128
author Deng, Qiangyu
Tang, Bihan
Xue, Chen
Liu, Yuan
Liu, Xu
Lv, Yipeng
Zhang, Lulu
author_facet Deng, Qiangyu
Tang, Bihan
Xue, Chen
Liu, Yuan
Liu, Xu
Lv, Yipeng
Zhang, Lulu
author_sort Deng, Qiangyu
collection PubMed
description Background: Description of the anatomical severity of injuries in trauma patients is important. While the Injury Severity Score has been regarded as the “gold standard” since its creation, several studies have indicated that the New Injury Severity Score is better. Therefore, we aimed to systematically evaluate and compare the accuracy of the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score in predicting mortality. Methods: Two researchers independently searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases and included studies from which the exact number of true-positive, false-positive, false-negative, and true-negative results could be extracted. Quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies checklist criteria. The meta-analysis was performed using Meta-DiSc. Meta-regression, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the source(s) of heterogeneity and factor(s) affecting the accuracy of the New Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score in predicting mortality. Results: The heterogeneity of the 11 relevant studies (total n = 11,866) was high (I(2) > 80%). The meta-analysis using a random-effects model resulted in sensitivity of 0.64, specificity of 0.93, positive likelihood ratio of 5.11, negative likelihood ratio of 0.27, diagnostic odds ratio of 27.75, and area under the summary receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.9009 for the Injury Severity Score; and sensitivity of 0.71, specificity of 0.87, positive likelihood ratio of 5.22, negative likelihood ratio of 0.20, diagnostic odds ratio of 24.74, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9095 for the New Injury Severity Score. Conclusion: The New Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score have similar abilities in predicting mortality. Further research is required to determine the appropriate use of the Injury Severity Score or the New Injury Severity Score based on specific patient condition and trauma type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4997511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49975112016-08-26 Comparison of the Ability to Predict Mortality between the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score: A Meta-Analysis Deng, Qiangyu Tang, Bihan Xue, Chen Liu, Yuan Liu, Xu Lv, Yipeng Zhang, Lulu Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Background: Description of the anatomical severity of injuries in trauma patients is important. While the Injury Severity Score has been regarded as the “gold standard” since its creation, several studies have indicated that the New Injury Severity Score is better. Therefore, we aimed to systematically evaluate and compare the accuracy of the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score in predicting mortality. Methods: Two researchers independently searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases and included studies from which the exact number of true-positive, false-positive, false-negative, and true-negative results could be extracted. Quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies checklist criteria. The meta-analysis was performed using Meta-DiSc. Meta-regression, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the source(s) of heterogeneity and factor(s) affecting the accuracy of the New Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score in predicting mortality. Results: The heterogeneity of the 11 relevant studies (total n = 11,866) was high (I(2) > 80%). The meta-analysis using a random-effects model resulted in sensitivity of 0.64, specificity of 0.93, positive likelihood ratio of 5.11, negative likelihood ratio of 0.27, diagnostic odds ratio of 27.75, and area under the summary receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.9009 for the Injury Severity Score; and sensitivity of 0.71, specificity of 0.87, positive likelihood ratio of 5.22, negative likelihood ratio of 0.20, diagnostic odds ratio of 24.74, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9095 for the New Injury Severity Score. Conclusion: The New Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score have similar abilities in predicting mortality. Further research is required to determine the appropriate use of the Injury Severity Score or the New Injury Severity Score based on specific patient condition and trauma type. MDPI 2016-08-16 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4997511/ /pubmed/27537902 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080825 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Deng, Qiangyu
Tang, Bihan
Xue, Chen
Liu, Yuan
Liu, Xu
Lv, Yipeng
Zhang, Lulu
Comparison of the Ability to Predict Mortality between the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score: A Meta-Analysis
title Comparison of the Ability to Predict Mortality between the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison of the Ability to Predict Mortality between the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of the Ability to Predict Mortality between the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Ability to Predict Mortality between the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison of the Ability to Predict Mortality between the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of the ability to predict mortality between the injury severity score and the new injury severity score: a meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27537902
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080825
work_keys_str_mv AT dengqiangyu comparisonoftheabilitytopredictmortalitybetweentheinjuryseverityscoreandthenewinjuryseverityscoreametaanalysis
AT tangbihan comparisonoftheabilitytopredictmortalitybetweentheinjuryseverityscoreandthenewinjuryseverityscoreametaanalysis
AT xuechen comparisonoftheabilitytopredictmortalitybetweentheinjuryseverityscoreandthenewinjuryseverityscoreametaanalysis
AT liuyuan comparisonoftheabilitytopredictmortalitybetweentheinjuryseverityscoreandthenewinjuryseverityscoreametaanalysis
AT liuxu comparisonoftheabilitytopredictmortalitybetweentheinjuryseverityscoreandthenewinjuryseverityscoreametaanalysis
AT lvyipeng comparisonoftheabilitytopredictmortalitybetweentheinjuryseverityscoreandthenewinjuryseverityscoreametaanalysis
AT zhanglulu comparisonoftheabilitytopredictmortalitybetweentheinjuryseverityscoreandthenewinjuryseverityscoreametaanalysis