Cargando…

Intention-to-treat and transparency of related practices in randomized, controlled trials of anti-infectives

BACKGROUND: Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis is commonly recommended for use, due to its benefits on external validity, in randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). No published reports describe how ITT analysis, as well as alternative approaches, are used in anti-infective RCTs. The purpose of this st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beckett, Robert D., Loeser, Kathryn C., Bowman, Kathryn R., Towne, Trent G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27557676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0215-2
_version_ 1782449831903494144
author Beckett, Robert D.
Loeser, Kathryn C.
Bowman, Kathryn R.
Towne, Trent G.
author_facet Beckett, Robert D.
Loeser, Kathryn C.
Bowman, Kathryn R.
Towne, Trent G.
author_sort Beckett, Robert D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis is commonly recommended for use, due to its benefits on external validity, in randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). No published reports describe how ITT analysis, as well as alternative approaches, are used in anti-infective RCTs. The purpose of this study is to describe the extent to which ITT analysis and alternative data approaches are used, the practices used to handle missing subject data, and whether non-inferiority trials present both ITT and per protocol (PP) analyses. Results of this analysis will help guide end users of infectious diseases primary drug literature. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of RCTs of anti-infectives published from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014 was conducted. A PubMed search identified relevant articles published in five specialty infectious diseases journals and four general medical journals. Each article was reviewed by two independent investigators with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify results. RESULTS: One hundred four articles met study criteria. The most common medication classes represented in the RCTs were hepatitis C antivirals (26 %), antibacterials (25 %), and antiretrovirals (21 %). Thirty studies (29 %) were non-inferiority trials. Most studies (77 %) described use of ITT or modified ITT (mITT) in their methods. Of the ITT and mITT studies, most (73 %) did not describe practices used to handle missing data. Most (97 %) non-inferiority trials described use of ITT, mITT, or both; however, only 15 (50 %) also described use of PP. CONCLUSIONS: RCTs of anti-infectives commonly employ ITT and mITT. Most do not describe how missing data were addressed. Non-inferiority trials of anti-infectives do not consistently employ both ITT and PP populations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0215-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4997732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49977322016-08-26 Intention-to-treat and transparency of related practices in randomized, controlled trials of anti-infectives Beckett, Robert D. Loeser, Kathryn C. Bowman, Kathryn R. Towne, Trent G. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis is commonly recommended for use, due to its benefits on external validity, in randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). No published reports describe how ITT analysis, as well as alternative approaches, are used in anti-infective RCTs. The purpose of this study is to describe the extent to which ITT analysis and alternative data approaches are used, the practices used to handle missing subject data, and whether non-inferiority trials present both ITT and per protocol (PP) analyses. Results of this analysis will help guide end users of infectious diseases primary drug literature. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of RCTs of anti-infectives published from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014 was conducted. A PubMed search identified relevant articles published in five specialty infectious diseases journals and four general medical journals. Each article was reviewed by two independent investigators with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify results. RESULTS: One hundred four articles met study criteria. The most common medication classes represented in the RCTs were hepatitis C antivirals (26 %), antibacterials (25 %), and antiretrovirals (21 %). Thirty studies (29 %) were non-inferiority trials. Most studies (77 %) described use of ITT or modified ITT (mITT) in their methods. Of the ITT and mITT studies, most (73 %) did not describe practices used to handle missing data. Most (97 %) non-inferiority trials described use of ITT, mITT, or both; however, only 15 (50 %) also described use of PP. CONCLUSIONS: RCTs of anti-infectives commonly employ ITT and mITT. Most do not describe how missing data were addressed. Non-inferiority trials of anti-infectives do not consistently employ both ITT and PP populations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0215-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4997732/ /pubmed/27557676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0215-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Beckett, Robert D.
Loeser, Kathryn C.
Bowman, Kathryn R.
Towne, Trent G.
Intention-to-treat and transparency of related practices in randomized, controlled trials of anti-infectives
title Intention-to-treat and transparency of related practices in randomized, controlled trials of anti-infectives
title_full Intention-to-treat and transparency of related practices in randomized, controlled trials of anti-infectives
title_fullStr Intention-to-treat and transparency of related practices in randomized, controlled trials of anti-infectives
title_full_unstemmed Intention-to-treat and transparency of related practices in randomized, controlled trials of anti-infectives
title_short Intention-to-treat and transparency of related practices in randomized, controlled trials of anti-infectives
title_sort intention-to-treat and transparency of related practices in randomized, controlled trials of anti-infectives
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27557676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0215-2
work_keys_str_mv AT beckettrobertd intentiontotreatandtransparencyofrelatedpracticesinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofantiinfectives
AT loeserkathrync intentiontotreatandtransparencyofrelatedpracticesinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofantiinfectives
AT bowmankathrynr intentiontotreatandtransparencyofrelatedpracticesinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofantiinfectives
AT townetrentg intentiontotreatandtransparencyofrelatedpracticesinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofantiinfectives