Cargando…

The spatial structure of chronic morbidity: evidence from UK census returns

BACKGROUND: Disease prevalence models have been widely used to estimate health, lifestyle and disability characteristics for small geographical units when other data are not available. Yet, knowledge is often lacking about how to make informed decisions around the specification of such models, espec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dutey-Magni, Peter F., Moon, Graham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27558383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-016-0057-5
_version_ 1782449839997452288
author Dutey-Magni, Peter F.
Moon, Graham
author_facet Dutey-Magni, Peter F.
Moon, Graham
author_sort Dutey-Magni, Peter F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Disease prevalence models have been widely used to estimate health, lifestyle and disability characteristics for small geographical units when other data are not available. Yet, knowledge is often lacking about how to make informed decisions around the specification of such models, especially regarding spatial assumptions placed on their covariance structure. This paper is concerned with understanding processes of spatial dependency in unexplained variation in chronic morbidity. METHODS: 2011 UK census data on limiting long-term illness (LLTI) is used to look at the spatial structure in chronic morbidity across England and Wales. The variance and spatial clustering of the odds of LLTI across local authority districts (LADs) and middle layer super output areas are measured across 40 demographic cross-classifications. A series of adjacency matrices based on distance, contiguity and migration flows are tested to examine the spatial structure in LLTI. Odds are then modelled using a logistic mixed model to examine the association with district-level covariates and their predictive power. RESULTS: The odds of chronic illness are more dispersed than local age characteristics, mortality, hospitalisation rates and chance alone would suggest. Of all adjacency matrices, the three-nearest neighbour method is identified as the best fitting. Migration flows can also be used to construct spatial weights matrices which uncover non-negligible autocorrelation. Once the most important characteristics observable at the LAD-level are taken into account, substantial spatial autocorrelation remains which can be modelled explicitly to improve disease prevalence predictions. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic investigation of spatial structures and dependency is important to develop model-based estimation tools in chronic disease mapping. Spatial structures reflecting migration interactions are easy to develop and capture autocorrelation in LLTI. Patterns of spatial dependency in the geographical distribution of LLTI are not comparable across ethnic groups. Ethnic stratification of local health information is needed and there is potential to further address complexity in prevalence models by improving access to disaggregated data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12942-016-0057-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4997767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49977672016-08-26 The spatial structure of chronic morbidity: evidence from UK census returns Dutey-Magni, Peter F. Moon, Graham Int J Health Geogr Research BACKGROUND: Disease prevalence models have been widely used to estimate health, lifestyle and disability characteristics for small geographical units when other data are not available. Yet, knowledge is often lacking about how to make informed decisions around the specification of such models, especially regarding spatial assumptions placed on their covariance structure. This paper is concerned with understanding processes of spatial dependency in unexplained variation in chronic morbidity. METHODS: 2011 UK census data on limiting long-term illness (LLTI) is used to look at the spatial structure in chronic morbidity across England and Wales. The variance and spatial clustering of the odds of LLTI across local authority districts (LADs) and middle layer super output areas are measured across 40 demographic cross-classifications. A series of adjacency matrices based on distance, contiguity and migration flows are tested to examine the spatial structure in LLTI. Odds are then modelled using a logistic mixed model to examine the association with district-level covariates and their predictive power. RESULTS: The odds of chronic illness are more dispersed than local age characteristics, mortality, hospitalisation rates and chance alone would suggest. Of all adjacency matrices, the three-nearest neighbour method is identified as the best fitting. Migration flows can also be used to construct spatial weights matrices which uncover non-negligible autocorrelation. Once the most important characteristics observable at the LAD-level are taken into account, substantial spatial autocorrelation remains which can be modelled explicitly to improve disease prevalence predictions. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic investigation of spatial structures and dependency is important to develop model-based estimation tools in chronic disease mapping. Spatial structures reflecting migration interactions are easy to develop and capture autocorrelation in LLTI. Patterns of spatial dependency in the geographical distribution of LLTI are not comparable across ethnic groups. Ethnic stratification of local health information is needed and there is potential to further address complexity in prevalence models by improving access to disaggregated data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12942-016-0057-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4997767/ /pubmed/27558383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-016-0057-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Dutey-Magni, Peter F.
Moon, Graham
The spatial structure of chronic morbidity: evidence from UK census returns
title The spatial structure of chronic morbidity: evidence from UK census returns
title_full The spatial structure of chronic morbidity: evidence from UK census returns
title_fullStr The spatial structure of chronic morbidity: evidence from UK census returns
title_full_unstemmed The spatial structure of chronic morbidity: evidence from UK census returns
title_short The spatial structure of chronic morbidity: evidence from UK census returns
title_sort spatial structure of chronic morbidity: evidence from uk census returns
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27558383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-016-0057-5
work_keys_str_mv AT duteymagnipeterf thespatialstructureofchronicmorbidityevidencefromukcensusreturns
AT moongraham thespatialstructureofchronicmorbidityevidencefromukcensusreturns
AT duteymagnipeterf spatialstructureofchronicmorbidityevidencefromukcensusreturns
AT moongraham spatialstructureofchronicmorbidityevidencefromukcensusreturns