Cargando…

Wild-Type and Non-Wild-Type Mycobacterium tuberculosis MIC Distributions for the Novel Fluoroquinolone Antofloxacin Compared with Those for Ofloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin

Antofloxacin (AFX) is a novel fluoroquinolone that has been approved in China for the treatment of infections caused by a variety of bacterial species. We investigated whether it could be repurposed for the treatment of tuberculosis by studying its in vitro activity. We determined the wild-type and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Xia, Wang, Guirong, Chen, Suting, Wei, Guomei, Shang, Yuanyuan, Dong, Lingling, Schön, Thomas, Moradigaravand, Danesh, Parkhill, Julian, Peacock, Sharon J., Köser, Claudio U., Huang, Hairong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27324769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00393-16
_version_ 1782449846339239936
author Yu, Xia
Wang, Guirong
Chen, Suting
Wei, Guomei
Shang, Yuanyuan
Dong, Lingling
Schön, Thomas
Moradigaravand, Danesh
Parkhill, Julian
Peacock, Sharon J.
Köser, Claudio U.
Huang, Hairong
author_facet Yu, Xia
Wang, Guirong
Chen, Suting
Wei, Guomei
Shang, Yuanyuan
Dong, Lingling
Schön, Thomas
Moradigaravand, Danesh
Parkhill, Julian
Peacock, Sharon J.
Köser, Claudio U.
Huang, Hairong
author_sort Yu, Xia
collection PubMed
description Antofloxacin (AFX) is a novel fluoroquinolone that has been approved in China for the treatment of infections caused by a variety of bacterial species. We investigated whether it could be repurposed for the treatment of tuberculosis by studying its in vitro activity. We determined the wild-type and non-wild-type MIC ranges for AFX as well as ofloxacin (OFX), levofloxacin (LFX), and moxifloxacin (MFX), using the microplate alamarBlue assay, of 126 clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from Beijing, China, of which 48 were OFX resistant on the basis of drug susceptibility testing on Löwenstein-Jensen medium. The MIC distributions were correlated with mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions of gyrA (Rv0006) and gyrB (Rv0005). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data for AFX were retrieved from the literature. AFX showed lower MIC levels than OFX but higher MIC levels than LFX and MFX on the basis of the tentative epidemiological cutoff values (ECOFFs) determined in this study. All strains with non-wild-type MICs for AFX harbored known resistance mutations that also resulted in non-wild-type MICs for LFX and MFX. Moreover, our data suggested that the current critical concentration of OFX for Löwenstein-Jensen medium that was recently revised by the World Health Organization might be too high, resulting in the misclassification of phenotypically non-wild-type strains with known resistance mutations as wild type. On the basis of our exploratory PK/PD calculations, the current dose of AFX is unlikely to be optimal for the treatment of tuberculosis, but higher doses could be effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4997829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49978292016-09-13 Wild-Type and Non-Wild-Type Mycobacterium tuberculosis MIC Distributions for the Novel Fluoroquinolone Antofloxacin Compared with Those for Ofloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin Yu, Xia Wang, Guirong Chen, Suting Wei, Guomei Shang, Yuanyuan Dong, Lingling Schön, Thomas Moradigaravand, Danesh Parkhill, Julian Peacock, Sharon J. Köser, Claudio U. Huang, Hairong Antimicrob Agents Chemother Mechanisms of Resistance Antofloxacin (AFX) is a novel fluoroquinolone that has been approved in China for the treatment of infections caused by a variety of bacterial species. We investigated whether it could be repurposed for the treatment of tuberculosis by studying its in vitro activity. We determined the wild-type and non-wild-type MIC ranges for AFX as well as ofloxacin (OFX), levofloxacin (LFX), and moxifloxacin (MFX), using the microplate alamarBlue assay, of 126 clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from Beijing, China, of which 48 were OFX resistant on the basis of drug susceptibility testing on Löwenstein-Jensen medium. The MIC distributions were correlated with mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions of gyrA (Rv0006) and gyrB (Rv0005). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data for AFX were retrieved from the literature. AFX showed lower MIC levels than OFX but higher MIC levels than LFX and MFX on the basis of the tentative epidemiological cutoff values (ECOFFs) determined in this study. All strains with non-wild-type MICs for AFX harbored known resistance mutations that also resulted in non-wild-type MICs for LFX and MFX. Moreover, our data suggested that the current critical concentration of OFX for Löwenstein-Jensen medium that was recently revised by the World Health Organization might be too high, resulting in the misclassification of phenotypically non-wild-type strains with known resistance mutations as wild type. On the basis of our exploratory PK/PD calculations, the current dose of AFX is unlikely to be optimal for the treatment of tuberculosis, but higher doses could be effective. American Society for Microbiology 2016-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4997829/ /pubmed/27324769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00393-16 Text en Copyright © 2016 Yu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mechanisms of Resistance
Yu, Xia
Wang, Guirong
Chen, Suting
Wei, Guomei
Shang, Yuanyuan
Dong, Lingling
Schön, Thomas
Moradigaravand, Danesh
Parkhill, Julian
Peacock, Sharon J.
Köser, Claudio U.
Huang, Hairong
Wild-Type and Non-Wild-Type Mycobacterium tuberculosis MIC Distributions for the Novel Fluoroquinolone Antofloxacin Compared with Those for Ofloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin
title Wild-Type and Non-Wild-Type Mycobacterium tuberculosis MIC Distributions for the Novel Fluoroquinolone Antofloxacin Compared with Those for Ofloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin
title_full Wild-Type and Non-Wild-Type Mycobacterium tuberculosis MIC Distributions for the Novel Fluoroquinolone Antofloxacin Compared with Those for Ofloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin
title_fullStr Wild-Type and Non-Wild-Type Mycobacterium tuberculosis MIC Distributions for the Novel Fluoroquinolone Antofloxacin Compared with Those for Ofloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin
title_full_unstemmed Wild-Type and Non-Wild-Type Mycobacterium tuberculosis MIC Distributions for the Novel Fluoroquinolone Antofloxacin Compared with Those for Ofloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin
title_short Wild-Type and Non-Wild-Type Mycobacterium tuberculosis MIC Distributions for the Novel Fluoroquinolone Antofloxacin Compared with Those for Ofloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin
title_sort wild-type and non-wild-type mycobacterium tuberculosis mic distributions for the novel fluoroquinolone antofloxacin compared with those for ofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin
topic Mechanisms of Resistance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27324769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00393-16
work_keys_str_mv AT yuxia wildtypeandnonwildtypemycobacteriumtuberculosismicdistributionsforthenovelfluoroquinoloneantofloxacincomparedwiththoseforofloxacinlevofloxacinandmoxifloxacin
AT wangguirong wildtypeandnonwildtypemycobacteriumtuberculosismicdistributionsforthenovelfluoroquinoloneantofloxacincomparedwiththoseforofloxacinlevofloxacinandmoxifloxacin
AT chensuting wildtypeandnonwildtypemycobacteriumtuberculosismicdistributionsforthenovelfluoroquinoloneantofloxacincomparedwiththoseforofloxacinlevofloxacinandmoxifloxacin
AT weiguomei wildtypeandnonwildtypemycobacteriumtuberculosismicdistributionsforthenovelfluoroquinoloneantofloxacincomparedwiththoseforofloxacinlevofloxacinandmoxifloxacin
AT shangyuanyuan wildtypeandnonwildtypemycobacteriumtuberculosismicdistributionsforthenovelfluoroquinoloneantofloxacincomparedwiththoseforofloxacinlevofloxacinandmoxifloxacin
AT donglingling wildtypeandnonwildtypemycobacteriumtuberculosismicdistributionsforthenovelfluoroquinoloneantofloxacincomparedwiththoseforofloxacinlevofloxacinandmoxifloxacin
AT schonthomas wildtypeandnonwildtypemycobacteriumtuberculosismicdistributionsforthenovelfluoroquinoloneantofloxacincomparedwiththoseforofloxacinlevofloxacinandmoxifloxacin
AT moradigaravanddanesh wildtypeandnonwildtypemycobacteriumtuberculosismicdistributionsforthenovelfluoroquinoloneantofloxacincomparedwiththoseforofloxacinlevofloxacinandmoxifloxacin
AT parkhilljulian wildtypeandnonwildtypemycobacteriumtuberculosismicdistributionsforthenovelfluoroquinoloneantofloxacincomparedwiththoseforofloxacinlevofloxacinandmoxifloxacin
AT peacocksharonj wildtypeandnonwildtypemycobacteriumtuberculosismicdistributionsforthenovelfluoroquinoloneantofloxacincomparedwiththoseforofloxacinlevofloxacinandmoxifloxacin
AT koserclaudiou wildtypeandnonwildtypemycobacteriumtuberculosismicdistributionsforthenovelfluoroquinoloneantofloxacincomparedwiththoseforofloxacinlevofloxacinandmoxifloxacin
AT huanghairong wildtypeandnonwildtypemycobacteriumtuberculosismicdistributionsforthenovelfluoroquinoloneantofloxacincomparedwiththoseforofloxacinlevofloxacinandmoxifloxacin