Cargando…

Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Placebo-controlled Randomized Trials on the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes With Traditional Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review

Placebo-controlled randomized trials are often used to evaluate the absolute effect of new treatments and are considered gold standard for clinical trials. No studies, however, have yet been conducted evaluating the reporting quality of placebo-controlled randomized trials. The current study aims to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Xiyan, Zhen, Zhong, Guo, Jing, Zhao, Tianyu, Ye, Ru, Guo, Yu, Chen, Hongdong, Lian, Fengmei, Tong, Xiaolin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4998267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26817893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002522
_version_ 1782449905150722048
author Zhao, Xiyan
Zhen, Zhong
Guo, Jing
Zhao, Tianyu
Ye, Ru
Guo, Yu
Chen, Hongdong
Lian, Fengmei
Tong, Xiaolin
author_facet Zhao, Xiyan
Zhen, Zhong
Guo, Jing
Zhao, Tianyu
Ye, Ru
Guo, Yu
Chen, Hongdong
Lian, Fengmei
Tong, Xiaolin
author_sort Zhao, Xiyan
collection PubMed
description Placebo-controlled randomized trials are often used to evaluate the absolute effect of new treatments and are considered gold standard for clinical trials. No studies, however, have yet been conducted evaluating the reporting quality of placebo-controlled randomized trials. The current study aims to assess the reporting quality of placebo-controlled randomized trials on treatment of diabetes with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in Mainland China and to provide recommendations for improvements. China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Wanfang database, China Biology Medicine database, and VIP database were searched for placebo-controlled randomized trials on treatment of diabetes with TCM. Review, animal experiment, and randomized controlled trials without placebo control were excluded. According to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 checklists items, each item was given a yes or no depending on whether it was reported or not. A total of 68 articles were included. The reporting percentage in each article ranged from 24.3% to 73%, and 30.9% articles reported more than 50% of the items. Seven of the 37 items were reported more than 90% of the items, whereas 7 items were not mentioned at all. The average reporting for “title and abstract,” “introduction,” “methods,” “results,” “discussion,” and “other information” was 43.4%, 78.7%, 40.1%, 49.9%, 71.1%, and 17.2%, respectively. The percentage of each section had increased after 2010. In addition, the reporting of multiple study centers, funding, placebo species, informed consent forms, and ethical approvals were 14.7%, 50%, 36.85%, 33.8%, and 4.4%, respectively. Although a scoring system was created according to the CONSORT 2010 checklist, it was not designed as an assessment tool. According to CONSORT 2010, the reporting quality of placebo-controlled randomized trials on the treatment of diabetes with TCM improved after 2010. Future improvements, however, are still needed, particularly in methods sections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4998267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49982672016-09-02 Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Placebo-controlled Randomized Trials on the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes With Traditional Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review Zhao, Xiyan Zhen, Zhong Guo, Jing Zhao, Tianyu Ye, Ru Guo, Yu Chen, Hongdong Lian, Fengmei Tong, Xiaolin Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 Placebo-controlled randomized trials are often used to evaluate the absolute effect of new treatments and are considered gold standard for clinical trials. No studies, however, have yet been conducted evaluating the reporting quality of placebo-controlled randomized trials. The current study aims to assess the reporting quality of placebo-controlled randomized trials on treatment of diabetes with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in Mainland China and to provide recommendations for improvements. China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Wanfang database, China Biology Medicine database, and VIP database were searched for placebo-controlled randomized trials on treatment of diabetes with TCM. Review, animal experiment, and randomized controlled trials without placebo control were excluded. According to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 checklists items, each item was given a yes or no depending on whether it was reported or not. A total of 68 articles were included. The reporting percentage in each article ranged from 24.3% to 73%, and 30.9% articles reported more than 50% of the items. Seven of the 37 items were reported more than 90% of the items, whereas 7 items were not mentioned at all. The average reporting for “title and abstract,” “introduction,” “methods,” “results,” “discussion,” and “other information” was 43.4%, 78.7%, 40.1%, 49.9%, 71.1%, and 17.2%, respectively. The percentage of each section had increased after 2010. In addition, the reporting of multiple study centers, funding, placebo species, informed consent forms, and ethical approvals were 14.7%, 50%, 36.85%, 33.8%, and 4.4%, respectively. Although a scoring system was created according to the CONSORT 2010 checklist, it was not designed as an assessment tool. According to CONSORT 2010, the reporting quality of placebo-controlled randomized trials on the treatment of diabetes with TCM improved after 2010. Future improvements, however, are still needed, particularly in methods sections. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4998267/ /pubmed/26817893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002522 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
spellingShingle 3800
Zhao, Xiyan
Zhen, Zhong
Guo, Jing
Zhao, Tianyu
Ye, Ru
Guo, Yu
Chen, Hongdong
Lian, Fengmei
Tong, Xiaolin
Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Placebo-controlled Randomized Trials on the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes With Traditional Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review
title Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Placebo-controlled Randomized Trials on the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes With Traditional Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review
title_full Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Placebo-controlled Randomized Trials on the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes With Traditional Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review
title_fullStr Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Placebo-controlled Randomized Trials on the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes With Traditional Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Placebo-controlled Randomized Trials on the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes With Traditional Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review
title_short Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Placebo-controlled Randomized Trials on the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes With Traditional Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review
title_sort assessment of the reporting quality of placebo-controlled randomized trials on the treatment of type 2 diabetes with traditional chinese medicine in mainland china: a prisma-compliant systematic review
topic 3800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4998267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26817893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002522
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoxiyan assessmentofthereportingqualityofplacebocontrolledrandomizedtrialsonthetreatmentoftype2diabeteswithtraditionalchinesemedicineinmainlandchinaaprismacompliantsystematicreview
AT zhenzhong assessmentofthereportingqualityofplacebocontrolledrandomizedtrialsonthetreatmentoftype2diabeteswithtraditionalchinesemedicineinmainlandchinaaprismacompliantsystematicreview
AT guojing assessmentofthereportingqualityofplacebocontrolledrandomizedtrialsonthetreatmentoftype2diabeteswithtraditionalchinesemedicineinmainlandchinaaprismacompliantsystematicreview
AT zhaotianyu assessmentofthereportingqualityofplacebocontrolledrandomizedtrialsonthetreatmentoftype2diabeteswithtraditionalchinesemedicineinmainlandchinaaprismacompliantsystematicreview
AT yeru assessmentofthereportingqualityofplacebocontrolledrandomizedtrialsonthetreatmentoftype2diabeteswithtraditionalchinesemedicineinmainlandchinaaprismacompliantsystematicreview
AT guoyu assessmentofthereportingqualityofplacebocontrolledrandomizedtrialsonthetreatmentoftype2diabeteswithtraditionalchinesemedicineinmainlandchinaaprismacompliantsystematicreview
AT chenhongdong assessmentofthereportingqualityofplacebocontrolledrandomizedtrialsonthetreatmentoftype2diabeteswithtraditionalchinesemedicineinmainlandchinaaprismacompliantsystematicreview
AT lianfengmei assessmentofthereportingqualityofplacebocontrolledrandomizedtrialsonthetreatmentoftype2diabeteswithtraditionalchinesemedicineinmainlandchinaaprismacompliantsystematicreview
AT tongxiaolin assessmentofthereportingqualityofplacebocontrolledrandomizedtrialsonthetreatmentoftype2diabeteswithtraditionalchinesemedicineinmainlandchinaaprismacompliantsystematicreview