Cargando…

The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Specific diagnostic biomarker for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has been lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to investigate serum MUC5AC's diagnostic performance on CCA. Studies investigating serum MUC5AC's diagnostic value on CCA were retrieved from Pubmed, E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xuan, Ji, Li, Jing, Zhou, Zhirui, Zhou, Renrong, Xu, Huabing, Wen, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4998430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27310944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003513
_version_ 1782449940745682944
author Xuan, Ji
Li, Jing
Zhou, Zhirui
Zhou, Renrong
Xu, Huabing
Wen, Wei
author_facet Xuan, Ji
Li, Jing
Zhou, Zhirui
Zhou, Renrong
Xu, Huabing
Wen, Wei
author_sort Xuan, Ji
collection PubMed
description Specific diagnostic biomarker for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has been lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to investigate serum MUC5AC's diagnostic performance on CCA. Studies investigating serum MUC5AC's diagnostic value on CCA were retrieved from Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The methodology quality of included studies was assessed according to QUADAS-2. Diagnostic 2 × 2 table was extracted from each eligible study, Meta-disc 1.4 was used for statistical analysis, data synthesis was done using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to region and array method. Six eligible studies were identified, a total of 1213 patients were involved in the meta-analysis. The AUC on SROC was 0.9138, and the Q∗ was 8463. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 0.69 (95% CI: 0.65–0.73), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95), 8.99 (95% CI: 5.65–14.30), 0.33 (95% CI: 0.24–0.46), and 33.98 (95% CI: 20.12–57.40), respectively. Targeting MUC5AC's epitope has a higher pooled sensitivity than targeting MUC5AC protein (0.77 vs 0.63). There was substantial cross-study heterogeneity. Serum MUC5AC might be potentially used as a surrogate marker in the diagnosis of CCA. However, the appropriate array method and the optimum cut-off value are yet to be decided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4998430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49984302016-09-02 The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis Xuan, Ji Li, Jing Zhou, Zhirui Zhou, Renrong Xu, Huabing Wen, Wei Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 Specific diagnostic biomarker for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has been lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to investigate serum MUC5AC's diagnostic performance on CCA. Studies investigating serum MUC5AC's diagnostic value on CCA were retrieved from Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The methodology quality of included studies was assessed according to QUADAS-2. Diagnostic 2 × 2 table was extracted from each eligible study, Meta-disc 1.4 was used for statistical analysis, data synthesis was done using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to region and array method. Six eligible studies were identified, a total of 1213 patients were involved in the meta-analysis. The AUC on SROC was 0.9138, and the Q∗ was 8463. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 0.69 (95% CI: 0.65–0.73), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95), 8.99 (95% CI: 5.65–14.30), 0.33 (95% CI: 0.24–0.46), and 33.98 (95% CI: 20.12–57.40), respectively. Targeting MUC5AC's epitope has a higher pooled sensitivity than targeting MUC5AC protein (0.77 vs 0.63). There was substantial cross-study heterogeneity. Serum MUC5AC might be potentially used as a surrogate marker in the diagnosis of CCA. However, the appropriate array method and the optimum cut-off value are yet to be decided. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4998430/ /pubmed/27310944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003513 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 4500
Xuan, Ji
Li, Jing
Zhou, Zhirui
Zhou, Renrong
Xu, Huabing
Wen, Wei
The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic performance of serum muc5ac for cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4998430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27310944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003513
work_keys_str_mv AT xuanji thediagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijing thediagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhouzhirui thediagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhourenrong thediagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuhuabing thediagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wenwei thediagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuanji diagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijing diagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhouzhirui diagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhourenrong diagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuhuabing diagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wenwei diagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis