Cargando…
The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Specific diagnostic biomarker for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has been lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to investigate serum MUC5AC's diagnostic performance on CCA. Studies investigating serum MUC5AC's diagnostic value on CCA were retrieved from Pubmed, E...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4998430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27310944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003513 |
_version_ | 1782449940745682944 |
---|---|
author | Xuan, Ji Li, Jing Zhou, Zhirui Zhou, Renrong Xu, Huabing Wen, Wei |
author_facet | Xuan, Ji Li, Jing Zhou, Zhirui Zhou, Renrong Xu, Huabing Wen, Wei |
author_sort | Xuan, Ji |
collection | PubMed |
description | Specific diagnostic biomarker for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has been lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to investigate serum MUC5AC's diagnostic performance on CCA. Studies investigating serum MUC5AC's diagnostic value on CCA were retrieved from Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The methodology quality of included studies was assessed according to QUADAS-2. Diagnostic 2 × 2 table was extracted from each eligible study, Meta-disc 1.4 was used for statistical analysis, data synthesis was done using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to region and array method. Six eligible studies were identified, a total of 1213 patients were involved in the meta-analysis. The AUC on SROC was 0.9138, and the Q∗ was 8463. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 0.69 (95% CI: 0.65–0.73), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95), 8.99 (95% CI: 5.65–14.30), 0.33 (95% CI: 0.24–0.46), and 33.98 (95% CI: 20.12–57.40), respectively. Targeting MUC5AC's epitope has a higher pooled sensitivity than targeting MUC5AC protein (0.77 vs 0.63). There was substantial cross-study heterogeneity. Serum MUC5AC might be potentially used as a surrogate marker in the diagnosis of CCA. However, the appropriate array method and the optimum cut-off value are yet to be decided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4998430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49984302016-09-02 The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis Xuan, Ji Li, Jing Zhou, Zhirui Zhou, Renrong Xu, Huabing Wen, Wei Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 Specific diagnostic biomarker for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has been lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to investigate serum MUC5AC's diagnostic performance on CCA. Studies investigating serum MUC5AC's diagnostic value on CCA were retrieved from Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The methodology quality of included studies was assessed according to QUADAS-2. Diagnostic 2 × 2 table was extracted from each eligible study, Meta-disc 1.4 was used for statistical analysis, data synthesis was done using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to region and array method. Six eligible studies were identified, a total of 1213 patients were involved in the meta-analysis. The AUC on SROC was 0.9138, and the Q∗ was 8463. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 0.69 (95% CI: 0.65–0.73), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95), 8.99 (95% CI: 5.65–14.30), 0.33 (95% CI: 0.24–0.46), and 33.98 (95% CI: 20.12–57.40), respectively. Targeting MUC5AC's epitope has a higher pooled sensitivity than targeting MUC5AC protein (0.77 vs 0.63). There was substantial cross-study heterogeneity. Serum MUC5AC might be potentially used as a surrogate marker in the diagnosis of CCA. However, the appropriate array method and the optimum cut-off value are yet to be decided. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4998430/ /pubmed/27310944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003513 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4500 Xuan, Ji Li, Jing Zhou, Zhirui Zhou, Renrong Xu, Huabing Wen, Wei The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The diagnostic performance of serum MUC5AC for cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of serum muc5ac for cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | 4500 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4998430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27310944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuanji thediagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijing thediagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhouzhirui thediagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhourenrong thediagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuhuabing thediagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wenwei thediagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuanji diagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijing diagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhouzhirui diagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhourenrong diagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuhuabing diagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wenwei diagnosticperformanceofserummuc5acforcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |