Cargando…

Electrical Impedance Tomography-guided PEEP Titration in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery

The aim of the study is to utilize electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to guide positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and to optimize oxygenation in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to the control (C) group and the EIT (E) group (n = 25 ea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Xingying, Jiang, Jingjing, Liu, Yuli, Xu, Haitao, Zhou, Shuangqiong, Yang, Shibo, Shi, Xueyin, Yuan, Hongbin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4998820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27057904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003306
_version_ 1782450014525587456
author He, Xingying
Jiang, Jingjing
Liu, Yuli
Xu, Haitao
Zhou, Shuangqiong
Yang, Shibo
Shi, Xueyin
Yuan, Hongbin
author_facet He, Xingying
Jiang, Jingjing
Liu, Yuli
Xu, Haitao
Zhou, Shuangqiong
Yang, Shibo
Shi, Xueyin
Yuan, Hongbin
author_sort He, Xingying
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study is to utilize electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to guide positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and to optimize oxygenation in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to the control (C) group and the EIT (E) group (n = 25 each). We set the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)) at 0.30. The PEEP was titrated and increased in a 2-cm H(2)O stepwise manner, from 6 to 14 cm H(2)O. Hemodynamic variables, respiratory mechanics, EIT images, analysis of blood gas, and regional cerebral oxygen saturation were recorded. The postoperative pulmonary complications within the first 5 days were also observed. We chose 10 cm H(2)O and 8 cm H(2)O as the “ideal” PEEP for the C and the E groups, respectively. EIT-guided PEEP titration led to a more dorsal shift of ventilation. The PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio in the E group was superior to that in the C group in the pneumoperitoneum period, though the difference was not significant (330 ± 10 vs 305.56 ± 4 mm Hg; P = 0.09). The C group patients experienced 8.7% postoperative pulmonary complications versus 5.3% among the E group patients (relative risk 1.27, 95% confidence interval 0.31–5.3, P = 0.75). Electrical impedance tomography represents a new promising technique that could enable anesthesiologists to assess regional ventilation of the lungs and optimize global oxygenation for patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4998820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49988202016-08-29 Electrical Impedance Tomography-guided PEEP Titration in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery He, Xingying Jiang, Jingjing Liu, Yuli Xu, Haitao Zhou, Shuangqiong Yang, Shibo Shi, Xueyin Yuan, Hongbin Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 The aim of the study is to utilize electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to guide positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and to optimize oxygenation in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to the control (C) group and the EIT (E) group (n = 25 each). We set the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)) at 0.30. The PEEP was titrated and increased in a 2-cm H(2)O stepwise manner, from 6 to 14 cm H(2)O. Hemodynamic variables, respiratory mechanics, EIT images, analysis of blood gas, and regional cerebral oxygen saturation were recorded. The postoperative pulmonary complications within the first 5 days were also observed. We chose 10 cm H(2)O and 8 cm H(2)O as the “ideal” PEEP for the C and the E groups, respectively. EIT-guided PEEP titration led to a more dorsal shift of ventilation. The PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio in the E group was superior to that in the C group in the pneumoperitoneum period, though the difference was not significant (330 ± 10 vs 305.56 ± 4 mm Hg; P = 0.09). The C group patients experienced 8.7% postoperative pulmonary complications versus 5.3% among the E group patients (relative risk 1.27, 95% confidence interval 0.31–5.3, P = 0.75). Electrical impedance tomography represents a new promising technique that could enable anesthesiologists to assess regional ventilation of the lungs and optimize global oxygenation for patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4998820/ /pubmed/27057904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003306 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
spellingShingle 3300
He, Xingying
Jiang, Jingjing
Liu, Yuli
Xu, Haitao
Zhou, Shuangqiong
Yang, Shibo
Shi, Xueyin
Yuan, Hongbin
Electrical Impedance Tomography-guided PEEP Titration in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery
title Electrical Impedance Tomography-guided PEEP Titration in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery
title_full Electrical Impedance Tomography-guided PEEP Titration in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery
title_fullStr Electrical Impedance Tomography-guided PEEP Titration in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Electrical Impedance Tomography-guided PEEP Titration in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery
title_short Electrical Impedance Tomography-guided PEEP Titration in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery
title_sort electrical impedance tomography-guided peep titration in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery
topic 3300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4998820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27057904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003306
work_keys_str_mv AT hexingying electricalimpedancetomographyguidedpeeptitrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicabdominalsurgery
AT jiangjingjing electricalimpedancetomographyguidedpeeptitrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicabdominalsurgery
AT liuyuli electricalimpedancetomographyguidedpeeptitrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicabdominalsurgery
AT xuhaitao electricalimpedancetomographyguidedpeeptitrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicabdominalsurgery
AT zhoushuangqiong electricalimpedancetomographyguidedpeeptitrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicabdominalsurgery
AT yangshibo electricalimpedancetomographyguidedpeeptitrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicabdominalsurgery
AT shixueyin electricalimpedancetomographyguidedpeeptitrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicabdominalsurgery
AT yuanhongbin electricalimpedancetomographyguidedpeeptitrationinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicabdominalsurgery