Cargando…
Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures
Increases in mammalian cell culture titres and densities have placed significant demands on primary recovery operation performance. This article presents a methodology which aims to screen rapidly and evaluate primary recovery technologies for their scope for technically feasible and cost‐effective...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4999028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/biot.201500336 |
_version_ | 1782450046103453696 |
---|---|
author | Popova, Daria Stonier, Adam Pain, David Titchener‐Hooker, Nigel J. Farid, Suzanne S. |
author_facet | Popova, Daria Stonier, Adam Pain, David Titchener‐Hooker, Nigel J. Farid, Suzanne S. |
author_sort | Popova, Daria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increases in mammalian cell culture titres and densities have placed significant demands on primary recovery operation performance. This article presents a methodology which aims to screen rapidly and evaluate primary recovery technologies for their scope for technically feasible and cost‐effective operation in the context of high cell density mammalian cell cultures. It was applied to assess the performance of current (centrifugation and depth filtration options) and alternative (tangential flow filtration (TFF)) primary recovery strategies. Cell culture test materials (CCTM) were generated to simulate the most demanding cell culture conditions selected as a screening challenge for the technologies. The performance of these technology options was assessed using lab scale and ultra scale‐down (USD) mimics requiring 25–110mL volumes for centrifugation and depth filtration and TFF screening experiments respectively. A centrifugation and depth filtration combination as well as both of the alternative technologies met the performance selection criteria. A detailed process economics evaluation was carried out at three scales of manufacturing (2,000L, 10,000L, 20,000L), where alternative primary recovery options were shown to potentially provide a more cost‐effective primary recovery process in the future. This assessment process and the study results can aid technology selection to identify the most effective option for a specific scenario. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4999028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | WILEY‐VCH Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49990282016-09-13 Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures Popova, Daria Stonier, Adam Pain, David Titchener‐Hooker, Nigel J. Farid, Suzanne S. Biotechnol J Research Articles Increases in mammalian cell culture titres and densities have placed significant demands on primary recovery operation performance. This article presents a methodology which aims to screen rapidly and evaluate primary recovery technologies for their scope for technically feasible and cost‐effective operation in the context of high cell density mammalian cell cultures. It was applied to assess the performance of current (centrifugation and depth filtration options) and alternative (tangential flow filtration (TFF)) primary recovery strategies. Cell culture test materials (CCTM) were generated to simulate the most demanding cell culture conditions selected as a screening challenge for the technologies. The performance of these technology options was assessed using lab scale and ultra scale‐down (USD) mimics requiring 25–110mL volumes for centrifugation and depth filtration and TFF screening experiments respectively. A centrifugation and depth filtration combination as well as both of the alternative technologies met the performance selection criteria. A detailed process economics evaluation was carried out at three scales of manufacturing (2,000L, 10,000L, 20,000L), where alternative primary recovery options were shown to potentially provide a more cost‐effective primary recovery process in the future. This assessment process and the study results can aid technology selection to identify the most effective option for a specific scenario. WILEY‐VCH Verlag 2016-05-09 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4999028/ /pubmed/27067803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/biot.201500336 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Biotechnology Journal published by WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Popova, Daria Stonier, Adam Pain, David Titchener‐Hooker, Nigel J. Farid, Suzanne S. Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures |
title | Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures |
title_full | Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures |
title_fullStr | Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures |
title_full_unstemmed | Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures |
title_short | Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures |
title_sort | integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density cho cultures |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4999028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/biot.201500336 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT popovadaria integratedeconomicandexperimentalframeworkforscreeningofprimaryrecoverytechnologiesforhighcelldensitychocultures AT stonieradam integratedeconomicandexperimentalframeworkforscreeningofprimaryrecoverytechnologiesforhighcelldensitychocultures AT paindavid integratedeconomicandexperimentalframeworkforscreeningofprimaryrecoverytechnologiesforhighcelldensitychocultures AT titchenerhookernigelj integratedeconomicandexperimentalframeworkforscreeningofprimaryrecoverytechnologiesforhighcelldensitychocultures AT faridsuzannes integratedeconomicandexperimentalframeworkforscreeningofprimaryrecoverytechnologiesforhighcelldensitychocultures |