Cargando…

Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures

Increases in mammalian cell culture titres and densities have placed significant demands on primary recovery operation performance. This article presents a methodology which aims to screen rapidly and evaluate primary recovery technologies for their scope for technically feasible and cost‐effective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Popova, Daria, Stonier, Adam, Pain, David, Titchener‐Hooker, Nigel J., Farid, Suzanne S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: WILEY‐VCH Verlag 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4999028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/biot.201500336
_version_ 1782450046103453696
author Popova, Daria
Stonier, Adam
Pain, David
Titchener‐Hooker, Nigel J.
Farid, Suzanne S.
author_facet Popova, Daria
Stonier, Adam
Pain, David
Titchener‐Hooker, Nigel J.
Farid, Suzanne S.
author_sort Popova, Daria
collection PubMed
description Increases in mammalian cell culture titres and densities have placed significant demands on primary recovery operation performance. This article presents a methodology which aims to screen rapidly and evaluate primary recovery technologies for their scope for technically feasible and cost‐effective operation in the context of high cell density mammalian cell cultures. It was applied to assess the performance of current (centrifugation and depth filtration options) and alternative (tangential flow filtration (TFF)) primary recovery strategies. Cell culture test materials (CCTM) were generated to simulate the most demanding cell culture conditions selected as a screening challenge for the technologies. The performance of these technology options was assessed using lab scale and ultra scale‐down (USD) mimics requiring 25–110mL volumes for centrifugation and depth filtration and TFF screening experiments respectively. A centrifugation and depth filtration combination as well as both of the alternative technologies met the performance selection criteria. A detailed process economics evaluation was carried out at three scales of manufacturing (2,000L, 10,000L, 20,000L), where alternative primary recovery options were shown to potentially provide a more cost‐effective primary recovery process in the future. This assessment process and the study results can aid technology selection to identify the most effective option for a specific scenario.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4999028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher WILEY‐VCH Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49990282016-09-13 Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures Popova, Daria Stonier, Adam Pain, David Titchener‐Hooker, Nigel J. Farid, Suzanne S. Biotechnol J Research Articles Increases in mammalian cell culture titres and densities have placed significant demands on primary recovery operation performance. This article presents a methodology which aims to screen rapidly and evaluate primary recovery technologies for their scope for technically feasible and cost‐effective operation in the context of high cell density mammalian cell cultures. It was applied to assess the performance of current (centrifugation and depth filtration options) and alternative (tangential flow filtration (TFF)) primary recovery strategies. Cell culture test materials (CCTM) were generated to simulate the most demanding cell culture conditions selected as a screening challenge for the technologies. The performance of these technology options was assessed using lab scale and ultra scale‐down (USD) mimics requiring 25–110mL volumes for centrifugation and depth filtration and TFF screening experiments respectively. A centrifugation and depth filtration combination as well as both of the alternative technologies met the performance selection criteria. A detailed process economics evaluation was carried out at three scales of manufacturing (2,000L, 10,000L, 20,000L), where alternative primary recovery options were shown to potentially provide a more cost‐effective primary recovery process in the future. This assessment process and the study results can aid technology selection to identify the most effective option for a specific scenario. WILEY‐VCH Verlag 2016-05-09 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4999028/ /pubmed/27067803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/biot.201500336 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Biotechnology Journal published by WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Popova, Daria
Stonier, Adam
Pain, David
Titchener‐Hooker, Nigel J.
Farid, Suzanne S.
Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures
title Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures
title_full Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures
title_fullStr Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures
title_full_unstemmed Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures
title_short Integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density CHO cultures
title_sort integrated economic and experimental framework for screening of primary recovery technologies for high cell density cho cultures
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4999028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/biot.201500336
work_keys_str_mv AT popovadaria integratedeconomicandexperimentalframeworkforscreeningofprimaryrecoverytechnologiesforhighcelldensitychocultures
AT stonieradam integratedeconomicandexperimentalframeworkforscreeningofprimaryrecoverytechnologiesforhighcelldensitychocultures
AT paindavid integratedeconomicandexperimentalframeworkforscreeningofprimaryrecoverytechnologiesforhighcelldensitychocultures
AT titchenerhookernigelj integratedeconomicandexperimentalframeworkforscreeningofprimaryrecoverytechnologiesforhighcelldensitychocultures
AT faridsuzannes integratedeconomicandexperimentalframeworkforscreeningofprimaryrecoverytechnologiesforhighcelldensitychocultures