Cargando…

Evaluation of the PPAR-γ Agonist Pioglitazone in Mild Asthma: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) is a nuclear receptor that modulates inflammation in models of asthma. To determine whether pioglitazone improves measures of asthma control and airway inflammation, we performed a single-center randomized, double-blind, placebo-c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, J. R., Mortimer, K., Pang, L., Smith, K. M, Bailey, H., Hodgson, D. B., Shaw, D. E., Knox, A. J., Harrison, T. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4999189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27560168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160257
_version_ 1782450077473701888
author Anderson, J. R.
Mortimer, K.
Pang, L.
Smith, K. M
Bailey, H.
Hodgson, D. B.
Shaw, D. E.
Knox, A. J.
Harrison, T. W.
author_facet Anderson, J. R.
Mortimer, K.
Pang, L.
Smith, K. M
Bailey, H.
Hodgson, D. B.
Shaw, D. E.
Knox, A. J.
Harrison, T. W.
author_sort Anderson, J. R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) is a nuclear receptor that modulates inflammation in models of asthma. To determine whether pioglitazone improves measures of asthma control and airway inflammation, we performed a single-center randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. METHODS: Sixty-eight participants with mild asthma were randomized to 12 weeks pioglitazone (30 mg for 4 weeks, then 45 mg for 8 weeks) or placebo. The primary outcome was the adjusted mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) at 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes were mean peak expiratory flow (PEF), scores on the Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PD(20)), induced sputum counts, and sputum supernatant interferon gamma-inducible protein-10 (IP-10), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels. Study recruitment was closed early after considering the European Medicines Agency’s reports of a potential increased risk of bladder cancer with pioglitazone treatment. Fifty-five cases were included in the full analysis (FA) and 52 in the per-protocol (PP) analysis. RESULTS: There was no difference in the adjusted FEV(1) at 12 weeks (-0.014 L, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.15 to 0.12, p = 0.84) or in any of the secondary outcomes in the FA. The PP analysis replicated the FA, with the exception of a lower evening PEF in the pioglitazone group (-21 L/min, 95% CI -39 to -4, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that treatment with 12 weeks of pioglitazone improved asthma control or airway inflammation in mild asthma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01134835
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4999189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49991892016-09-12 Evaluation of the PPAR-γ Agonist Pioglitazone in Mild Asthma: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Anderson, J. R. Mortimer, K. Pang, L. Smith, K. M Bailey, H. Hodgson, D. B. Shaw, D. E. Knox, A. J. Harrison, T. W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) is a nuclear receptor that modulates inflammation in models of asthma. To determine whether pioglitazone improves measures of asthma control and airway inflammation, we performed a single-center randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. METHODS: Sixty-eight participants with mild asthma were randomized to 12 weeks pioglitazone (30 mg for 4 weeks, then 45 mg for 8 weeks) or placebo. The primary outcome was the adjusted mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) at 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes were mean peak expiratory flow (PEF), scores on the Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PD(20)), induced sputum counts, and sputum supernatant interferon gamma-inducible protein-10 (IP-10), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels. Study recruitment was closed early after considering the European Medicines Agency’s reports of a potential increased risk of bladder cancer with pioglitazone treatment. Fifty-five cases were included in the full analysis (FA) and 52 in the per-protocol (PP) analysis. RESULTS: There was no difference in the adjusted FEV(1) at 12 weeks (-0.014 L, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.15 to 0.12, p = 0.84) or in any of the secondary outcomes in the FA. The PP analysis replicated the FA, with the exception of a lower evening PEF in the pioglitazone group (-21 L/min, 95% CI -39 to -4, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that treatment with 12 weeks of pioglitazone improved asthma control or airway inflammation in mild asthma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01134835 Public Library of Science 2016-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4999189/ /pubmed/27560168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160257 Text en © 2016 Anderson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Anderson, J. R.
Mortimer, K.
Pang, L.
Smith, K. M
Bailey, H.
Hodgson, D. B.
Shaw, D. E.
Knox, A. J.
Harrison, T. W.
Evaluation of the PPAR-γ Agonist Pioglitazone in Mild Asthma: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title Evaluation of the PPAR-γ Agonist Pioglitazone in Mild Asthma: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Evaluation of the PPAR-γ Agonist Pioglitazone in Mild Asthma: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of the PPAR-γ Agonist Pioglitazone in Mild Asthma: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the PPAR-γ Agonist Pioglitazone in Mild Asthma: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Evaluation of the PPAR-γ Agonist Pioglitazone in Mild Asthma: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort evaluation of the ppar-γ agonist pioglitazone in mild asthma: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4999189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27560168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160257
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonjr evaluationoftheppargagonistpioglitazoneinmildasthmaadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mortimerk evaluationoftheppargagonistpioglitazoneinmildasthmaadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pangl evaluationoftheppargagonistpioglitazoneinmildasthmaadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT smithkm evaluationoftheppargagonistpioglitazoneinmildasthmaadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baileyh evaluationoftheppargagonistpioglitazoneinmildasthmaadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hodgsondb evaluationoftheppargagonistpioglitazoneinmildasthmaadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shawde evaluationoftheppargagonistpioglitazoneinmildasthmaadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT knoxaj evaluationoftheppargagonistpioglitazoneinmildasthmaadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT harrisontw evaluationoftheppargagonistpioglitazoneinmildasthmaadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial