Cargando…
The linea aspera as a guide for femoral rotation after tumor resection: is it directly posterior? A technical note
BACKGROUND: The linea aspera is the rough, longitudinal crest on the posterior surface of the femoral shaft. Most orthopedic surgeons depend on the linea aspera as an intraoperative landmark identifying the true posterior aspect of the femur. We investigated the position of the linea aspera to verif...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4999375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27015892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-016-0399-6 |
_version_ | 1782450104650694656 |
---|---|
author | Abdelaal, Ahmed Hamed Kassem Yamamoto, Norio Hayashi, Katsuhiro Takeuchi, Akihiko Miwa, Shinji Morsy, Ahmad Fawaz Kajino, Yoshitomo Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki |
author_facet | Abdelaal, Ahmed Hamed Kassem Yamamoto, Norio Hayashi, Katsuhiro Takeuchi, Akihiko Miwa, Shinji Morsy, Ahmad Fawaz Kajino, Yoshitomo Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki |
author_sort | Abdelaal, Ahmed Hamed Kassem |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The linea aspera is the rough, longitudinal crest on the posterior surface of the femoral shaft. Most orthopedic surgeons depend on the linea aspera as an intraoperative landmark identifying the true posterior aspect of the femur. We investigated the position of the linea aspera to verify whether the surgeon can rely on this accepted belief. MATERIAL AND METHOD: One hundred and thirty-three femora from 73 patients were evaluated. Four CT cuts were done of the mid femur, and we measured the angle of rotation of the linea aspera at each cut. RESULTS: The linea aspera was externally rotated in most femora evaluated; average angles of rotation were 15.4°, 14°, 11.7°, and 11.5° at 10, 15, 20, and 25 cm from the intercondylar line, respectively. The angle of rotation of the linea aspera was positively correlated with femoral neck anteversion angle and negatively with age. CONCLUSION: The linea aspera is exactly posterior in a minority of individuals, while it is externally rotated to varying degrees in the majority of individuals. The degree of rotation was positively correlated with femoral neck anteversion angle, and negatively with age. To avoid implant malrotation, accurate estimation of the rotation angle should be determined preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4999375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49993752016-09-12 The linea aspera as a guide for femoral rotation after tumor resection: is it directly posterior? A technical note Abdelaal, Ahmed Hamed Kassem Yamamoto, Norio Hayashi, Katsuhiro Takeuchi, Akihiko Miwa, Shinji Morsy, Ahmad Fawaz Kajino, Yoshitomo Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: The linea aspera is the rough, longitudinal crest on the posterior surface of the femoral shaft. Most orthopedic surgeons depend on the linea aspera as an intraoperative landmark identifying the true posterior aspect of the femur. We investigated the position of the linea aspera to verify whether the surgeon can rely on this accepted belief. MATERIAL AND METHOD: One hundred and thirty-three femora from 73 patients were evaluated. Four CT cuts were done of the mid femur, and we measured the angle of rotation of the linea aspera at each cut. RESULTS: The linea aspera was externally rotated in most femora evaluated; average angles of rotation were 15.4°, 14°, 11.7°, and 11.5° at 10, 15, 20, and 25 cm from the intercondylar line, respectively. The angle of rotation of the linea aspera was positively correlated with femoral neck anteversion angle and negatively with age. CONCLUSION: The linea aspera is exactly posterior in a minority of individuals, while it is externally rotated to varying degrees in the majority of individuals. The degree of rotation was positively correlated with femoral neck anteversion angle, and negatively with age. To avoid implant malrotation, accurate estimation of the rotation angle should be determined preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Springer International Publishing 2016-03-25 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4999375/ /pubmed/27015892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-016-0399-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Abdelaal, Ahmed Hamed Kassem Yamamoto, Norio Hayashi, Katsuhiro Takeuchi, Akihiko Miwa, Shinji Morsy, Ahmad Fawaz Kajino, Yoshitomo Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki The linea aspera as a guide for femoral rotation after tumor resection: is it directly posterior? A technical note |
title | The linea aspera as a guide for femoral rotation after tumor resection: is it directly posterior? A technical note |
title_full | The linea aspera as a guide for femoral rotation after tumor resection: is it directly posterior? A technical note |
title_fullStr | The linea aspera as a guide for femoral rotation after tumor resection: is it directly posterior? A technical note |
title_full_unstemmed | The linea aspera as a guide for femoral rotation after tumor resection: is it directly posterior? A technical note |
title_short | The linea aspera as a guide for femoral rotation after tumor resection: is it directly posterior? A technical note |
title_sort | linea aspera as a guide for femoral rotation after tumor resection: is it directly posterior? a technical note |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4999375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27015892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-016-0399-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelaalahmedhamedkassem thelineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote AT yamamotonorio thelineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote AT hayashikatsuhiro thelineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote AT takeuchiakihiko thelineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote AT miwashinji thelineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote AT morsyahmadfawaz thelineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote AT kajinoyoshitomo thelineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote AT tsuchiyahiroyuki thelineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote AT abdelaalahmedhamedkassem lineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote AT yamamotonorio lineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote AT hayashikatsuhiro lineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote AT takeuchiakihiko lineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote AT miwashinji lineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote AT morsyahmadfawaz lineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote AT kajinoyoshitomo lineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote AT tsuchiyahiroyuki lineaasperaasaguideforfemoralrotationaftertumorresectionisitdirectlyposterioratechnicalnote |