Cargando…

The effectiveness of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long span fixed partial denture (three-dimensional finite element analysis)

CONTEXT AND AIMS: Long span is seen in many clinical situations; treatment planning options of these cases are difficult and may require: Fixed partial denture (FPD), removable partial denture, or implant supported prostheses. Each option has its own disadvantages: Mechanical, patient relief, and co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mozayek, Rami Shurbaji, Mozayek, Mohammad Yamen Shurbaji, Allaf, Mirza, Abouharb, Mohammad Bassam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5000561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27621545
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.176533
_version_ 1782450310346702848
author Mozayek, Rami Shurbaji
Mozayek, Mohammad Yamen Shurbaji
Allaf, Mirza
Abouharb, Mohammad Bassam
author_facet Mozayek, Rami Shurbaji
Mozayek, Mohammad Yamen Shurbaji
Allaf, Mirza
Abouharb, Mohammad Bassam
author_sort Mozayek, Rami Shurbaji
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT AND AIMS: Long span is seen in many clinical situations; treatment planning options of these cases are difficult and may require: Fixed partial denture (FPD), removable partial denture, or implant supported prostheses. Each option has its own disadvantages: Mechanical, patient relief, and cost, respectively. This article will evaluate the stress distribution of another treatment option, which is adding a single supporting implant to the FPD using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Three models, each consisting of 5 units, were created as following: (1) Tooth pontic pontic pontic tooth, (2) tooth pontic implant pontic tooth, (3) tooth pontic pontic implant tooth. An axial force was applied to the prostheses using 3D finite element method, and stress was evaluated. RESULTS: Maximum stress was found in the prostheses in all models, highest stress values in all shared components of the models were close. Stress in implants was less in the second model than the third one. CONCLUSIONS: Adding a supporting implant in long span FPD has no advantages, whereas it has the disadvantages of complicating treatment and the complications that may occur to the implant and surrounding bone itself.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5000561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50005612017-07-01 The effectiveness of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long span fixed partial denture (three-dimensional finite element analysis) Mozayek, Rami Shurbaji Mozayek, Mohammad Yamen Shurbaji Allaf, Mirza Abouharb, Mohammad Bassam J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article CONTEXT AND AIMS: Long span is seen in many clinical situations; treatment planning options of these cases are difficult and may require: Fixed partial denture (FPD), removable partial denture, or implant supported prostheses. Each option has its own disadvantages: Mechanical, patient relief, and cost, respectively. This article will evaluate the stress distribution of another treatment option, which is adding a single supporting implant to the FPD using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Three models, each consisting of 5 units, were created as following: (1) Tooth pontic pontic pontic tooth, (2) tooth pontic implant pontic tooth, (3) tooth pontic pontic implant tooth. An axial force was applied to the prostheses using 3D finite element method, and stress was evaluated. RESULTS: Maximum stress was found in the prostheses in all models, highest stress values in all shared components of the models were close. Stress in implants was less in the second model than the third one. CONCLUSIONS: Adding a supporting implant in long span FPD has no advantages, whereas it has the disadvantages of complicating treatment and the complications that may occur to the implant and surrounding bone itself. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5000561/ /pubmed/27621545 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.176533 Text en Copyright: © 2016 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mozayek, Rami Shurbaji
Mozayek, Mohammad Yamen Shurbaji
Allaf, Mirza
Abouharb, Mohammad Bassam
The effectiveness of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long span fixed partial denture (three-dimensional finite element analysis)
title The effectiveness of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long span fixed partial denture (three-dimensional finite element analysis)
title_full The effectiveness of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long span fixed partial denture (three-dimensional finite element analysis)
title_fullStr The effectiveness of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long span fixed partial denture (three-dimensional finite element analysis)
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long span fixed partial denture (three-dimensional finite element analysis)
title_short The effectiveness of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long span fixed partial denture (three-dimensional finite element analysis)
title_sort effectiveness of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long span fixed partial denture (three-dimensional finite element analysis)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5000561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27621545
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.176533
work_keys_str_mv AT mozayekramishurbaji theeffectivenessofaddingasupportingimplantinstressdistributionoflongspanfixedpartialdenturethreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT mozayekmohammadyamenshurbaji theeffectivenessofaddingasupportingimplantinstressdistributionoflongspanfixedpartialdenturethreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT allafmirza theeffectivenessofaddingasupportingimplantinstressdistributionoflongspanfixedpartialdenturethreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT abouharbmohammadbassam theeffectivenessofaddingasupportingimplantinstressdistributionoflongspanfixedpartialdenturethreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT mozayekramishurbaji effectivenessofaddingasupportingimplantinstressdistributionoflongspanfixedpartialdenturethreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT mozayekmohammadyamenshurbaji effectivenessofaddingasupportingimplantinstressdistributionoflongspanfixedpartialdenturethreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT allafmirza effectivenessofaddingasupportingimplantinstressdistributionoflongspanfixedpartialdenturethreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT abouharbmohammadbassam effectivenessofaddingasupportingimplantinstressdistributionoflongspanfixedpartialdenturethreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis