Cargando…

The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To systematically evaluate the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in radical prostatectomy (RP) by a meta-analysis based on the published literature. To identify relevant studies, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database were searched from 1966 to May 2014. Finally, 25 st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Yi, Huang, Hai, Pan, Xiu-Wu, Xu, Dan-Feng, Cui, Xin-Gang, Chen, Jie, Hong, Yi, Gao, Yi, Yin, Lei, Ye, Jian-Qing, Li, Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5000804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26459779
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.156636
_version_ 1782450363487485952
author Huang, Yi
Huang, Hai
Pan, Xiu-Wu
Xu, Dan-Feng
Cui, Xin-Gang
Chen, Jie
Hong, Yi
Gao, Yi
Yin, Lei
Ye, Jian-Qing
Li, Lin
author_facet Huang, Yi
Huang, Hai
Pan, Xiu-Wu
Xu, Dan-Feng
Cui, Xin-Gang
Chen, Jie
Hong, Yi
Gao, Yi
Yin, Lei
Ye, Jian-Qing
Li, Lin
author_sort Huang, Yi
collection PubMed
description To systematically evaluate the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in radical prostatectomy (RP) by a meta-analysis based on the published literature. To identify relevant studies, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database were searched from 1966 to May 2014. Finally, 25 studies (9503 patients) were included. LVI was found in 12.2% (1156/9503) of the RP specimens. LVI was found to be correlated with higher pathological tumor stages (greater than pT3 stage) (risk ratio [RR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73–2.08, P < 0.00001), higher Gleason scores (greater than GS = 7) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.23–1.38, P < 0.00001), positive pathological node (pN) status (RR 5.67, 95% CI 3.14–10.24, P < 0.00001), extracapsular extension (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.46–2.02, P < 0.00001), and seminal vesicle involvement (RR 3.36, 95% CI 2.41–4.70, P < 0.00001). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) was statistically significant for Biochemical Recurrence-Free (BCR-free) probability (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.64–2.56; Z = 6.30, P < 0.00001). Sensitivity analysis showed that the pooled HR and 95% CI were not significantly altered by the omission of any single study. Begg's Funnel plots showed no significant publication bias (P = 0.112). In conclusion, LVI exhibited a detrimental effect on the BCR-Free probability and clinicopathological features in RP specimens, and may prove to be an independent prognostic factor of BCR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5000804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50008042016-09-13 The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Huang, Yi Huang, Hai Pan, Xiu-Wu Xu, Dan-Feng Cui, Xin-Gang Chen, Jie Hong, Yi Gao, Yi Yin, Lei Ye, Jian-Qing Li, Lin Asian J Androl Original Article To systematically evaluate the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in radical prostatectomy (RP) by a meta-analysis based on the published literature. To identify relevant studies, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database were searched from 1966 to May 2014. Finally, 25 studies (9503 patients) were included. LVI was found in 12.2% (1156/9503) of the RP specimens. LVI was found to be correlated with higher pathological tumor stages (greater than pT3 stage) (risk ratio [RR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73–2.08, P < 0.00001), higher Gleason scores (greater than GS = 7) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.23–1.38, P < 0.00001), positive pathological node (pN) status (RR 5.67, 95% CI 3.14–10.24, P < 0.00001), extracapsular extension (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.46–2.02, P < 0.00001), and seminal vesicle involvement (RR 3.36, 95% CI 2.41–4.70, P < 0.00001). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) was statistically significant for Biochemical Recurrence-Free (BCR-free) probability (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.64–2.56; Z = 6.30, P < 0.00001). Sensitivity analysis showed that the pooled HR and 95% CI were not significantly altered by the omission of any single study. Begg's Funnel plots showed no significant publication bias (P = 0.112). In conclusion, LVI exhibited a detrimental effect on the BCR-Free probability and clinicopathological features in RP specimens, and may prove to be an independent prognostic factor of BCR. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 2015-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5000804/ /pubmed/26459779 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.156636 Text en Copyright: © Asian Journal of Andrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Huang, Yi
Huang, Hai
Pan, Xiu-Wu
Xu, Dan-Feng
Cui, Xin-Gang
Chen, Jie
Hong, Yi
Gao, Yi
Yin, Lei
Ye, Jian-Qing
Li, Lin
The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5000804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26459779
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.156636
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyi theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huanghai theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT panxiuwu theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xudanfeng theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cuixingang theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenjie theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hongyi theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaoyi theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yinlei theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yejianqing theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lilin theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangyi prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huanghai prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT panxiuwu prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xudanfeng prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cuixingang prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenjie prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hongyi prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaoyi prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yinlei prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yejianqing prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lilin prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis