Cargando…
The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
To systematically evaluate the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in radical prostatectomy (RP) by a meta-analysis based on the published literature. To identify relevant studies, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database were searched from 1966 to May 2014. Finally, 25 st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5000804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26459779 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.156636 |
_version_ | 1782450363487485952 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Yi Huang, Hai Pan, Xiu-Wu Xu, Dan-Feng Cui, Xin-Gang Chen, Jie Hong, Yi Gao, Yi Yin, Lei Ye, Jian-Qing Li, Lin |
author_facet | Huang, Yi Huang, Hai Pan, Xiu-Wu Xu, Dan-Feng Cui, Xin-Gang Chen, Jie Hong, Yi Gao, Yi Yin, Lei Ye, Jian-Qing Li, Lin |
author_sort | Huang, Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | To systematically evaluate the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in radical prostatectomy (RP) by a meta-analysis based on the published literature. To identify relevant studies, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database were searched from 1966 to May 2014. Finally, 25 studies (9503 patients) were included. LVI was found in 12.2% (1156/9503) of the RP specimens. LVI was found to be correlated with higher pathological tumor stages (greater than pT3 stage) (risk ratio [RR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73–2.08, P < 0.00001), higher Gleason scores (greater than GS = 7) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.23–1.38, P < 0.00001), positive pathological node (pN) status (RR 5.67, 95% CI 3.14–10.24, P < 0.00001), extracapsular extension (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.46–2.02, P < 0.00001), and seminal vesicle involvement (RR 3.36, 95% CI 2.41–4.70, P < 0.00001). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) was statistically significant for Biochemical Recurrence-Free (BCR-free) probability (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.64–2.56; Z = 6.30, P < 0.00001). Sensitivity analysis showed that the pooled HR and 95% CI were not significantly altered by the omission of any single study. Begg's Funnel plots showed no significant publication bias (P = 0.112). In conclusion, LVI exhibited a detrimental effect on the BCR-Free probability and clinicopathological features in RP specimens, and may prove to be an independent prognostic factor of BCR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5000804 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50008042016-09-13 The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Huang, Yi Huang, Hai Pan, Xiu-Wu Xu, Dan-Feng Cui, Xin-Gang Chen, Jie Hong, Yi Gao, Yi Yin, Lei Ye, Jian-Qing Li, Lin Asian J Androl Original Article To systematically evaluate the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in radical prostatectomy (RP) by a meta-analysis based on the published literature. To identify relevant studies, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database were searched from 1966 to May 2014. Finally, 25 studies (9503 patients) were included. LVI was found in 12.2% (1156/9503) of the RP specimens. LVI was found to be correlated with higher pathological tumor stages (greater than pT3 stage) (risk ratio [RR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73–2.08, P < 0.00001), higher Gleason scores (greater than GS = 7) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.23–1.38, P < 0.00001), positive pathological node (pN) status (RR 5.67, 95% CI 3.14–10.24, P < 0.00001), extracapsular extension (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.46–2.02, P < 0.00001), and seminal vesicle involvement (RR 3.36, 95% CI 2.41–4.70, P < 0.00001). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) was statistically significant for Biochemical Recurrence-Free (BCR-free) probability (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.64–2.56; Z = 6.30, P < 0.00001). Sensitivity analysis showed that the pooled HR and 95% CI were not significantly altered by the omission of any single study. Begg's Funnel plots showed no significant publication bias (P = 0.112). In conclusion, LVI exhibited a detrimental effect on the BCR-Free probability and clinicopathological features in RP specimens, and may prove to be an independent prognostic factor of BCR. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 2015-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5000804/ /pubmed/26459779 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.156636 Text en Copyright: © Asian Journal of Andrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Huang, Yi Huang, Hai Pan, Xiu-Wu Xu, Dan-Feng Cui, Xin-Gang Chen, Jie Hong, Yi Gao, Yi Yin, Lei Ye, Jian-Qing Li, Lin The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5000804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26459779 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.156636 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangyi theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huanghai theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT panxiuwu theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xudanfeng theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cuixingang theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenjie theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hongyi theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gaoyi theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yinlei theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yejianqing theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lilin theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huangyi prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huanghai prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT panxiuwu prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xudanfeng prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cuixingang prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenjie prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hongyi prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gaoyi prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yinlei prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yejianqing prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lilin prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |