Cargando…
Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter ‘imo’
PURPOSE: We developed a new portable head-mounted perimeter, “imo”, which performs visual field (VF) testing under flexible conditions without a dark room. Besides the monocular eye test, imo can present a test target randomly to either eye without occlusion (a binocular random single eye test). The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5001626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27564382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161974 |
_version_ | 1782450454068723712 |
---|---|
author | Matsumoto, Chota Yamao, Sayaka Nomoto, Hiroki Takada, Sonoko Okuyama, Sachiko Kimura, Shinji Yamanaka, Kenzo Aihara, Makoto Shimomura, Yoshikazu |
author_facet | Matsumoto, Chota Yamao, Sayaka Nomoto, Hiroki Takada, Sonoko Okuyama, Sachiko Kimura, Shinji Yamanaka, Kenzo Aihara, Makoto Shimomura, Yoshikazu |
author_sort | Matsumoto, Chota |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We developed a new portable head-mounted perimeter, “imo”, which performs visual field (VF) testing under flexible conditions without a dark room. Besides the monocular eye test, imo can present a test target randomly to either eye without occlusion (a binocular random single eye test). The performance of imo was evaluated. METHODS: Using full HD transmissive LCD and high intensity LED backlights, imo can display a test target under the same test conditions as the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA). The monocular and binocular random single eye tests by imo and the HFA test were performed on 40 eyes of 20 subjects with glaucoma. VF sensitivity results by the monocular and binocular random single eye tests were compared, and these test results were further compared to those by the HFA. The subjects were asked whether they noticed which eye was being tested during the test. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity (MS) obtained with the HFA highly correlated with the MS by the imo monocular test (R: r = 0.96, L: r = 0.94, P < 0.001) and the binocular random single eye test (R: r = 0.97, L: r = 0.98, P < 0.001). The MS values by the monocular and binocular random single eye tests also highly correlated (R: r = 0.96, L: r = 0.95, P < 0.001). No subject could detect which eye was being tested during the examination. CONCLUSIONS: The perimeter imo can obtain VF sensitivity highly compatible to that by the standard automated perimeter. The binocular random single eye test provides a non-occlusion test condition without the examinee being aware of the tested eye. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5001626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50016262016-09-12 Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter ‘imo’ Matsumoto, Chota Yamao, Sayaka Nomoto, Hiroki Takada, Sonoko Okuyama, Sachiko Kimura, Shinji Yamanaka, Kenzo Aihara, Makoto Shimomura, Yoshikazu PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: We developed a new portable head-mounted perimeter, “imo”, which performs visual field (VF) testing under flexible conditions without a dark room. Besides the monocular eye test, imo can present a test target randomly to either eye without occlusion (a binocular random single eye test). The performance of imo was evaluated. METHODS: Using full HD transmissive LCD and high intensity LED backlights, imo can display a test target under the same test conditions as the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA). The monocular and binocular random single eye tests by imo and the HFA test were performed on 40 eyes of 20 subjects with glaucoma. VF sensitivity results by the monocular and binocular random single eye tests were compared, and these test results were further compared to those by the HFA. The subjects were asked whether they noticed which eye was being tested during the test. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity (MS) obtained with the HFA highly correlated with the MS by the imo monocular test (R: r = 0.96, L: r = 0.94, P < 0.001) and the binocular random single eye test (R: r = 0.97, L: r = 0.98, P < 0.001). The MS values by the monocular and binocular random single eye tests also highly correlated (R: r = 0.96, L: r = 0.95, P < 0.001). No subject could detect which eye was being tested during the examination. CONCLUSIONS: The perimeter imo can obtain VF sensitivity highly compatible to that by the standard automated perimeter. The binocular random single eye test provides a non-occlusion test condition without the examinee being aware of the tested eye. Public Library of Science 2016-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5001626/ /pubmed/27564382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161974 Text en © 2016 Matsumoto et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Matsumoto, Chota Yamao, Sayaka Nomoto, Hiroki Takada, Sonoko Okuyama, Sachiko Kimura, Shinji Yamanaka, Kenzo Aihara, Makoto Shimomura, Yoshikazu Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter ‘imo’ |
title | Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter ‘imo’ |
title_full | Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter ‘imo’ |
title_fullStr | Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter ‘imo’ |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter ‘imo’ |
title_short | Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter ‘imo’ |
title_sort | visual field testing with head-mounted perimeter ‘imo’ |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5001626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27564382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161974 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsumotochota visualfieldtestingwithheadmountedperimeterimo AT yamaosayaka visualfieldtestingwithheadmountedperimeterimo AT nomotohiroki visualfieldtestingwithheadmountedperimeterimo AT takadasonoko visualfieldtestingwithheadmountedperimeterimo AT okuyamasachiko visualfieldtestingwithheadmountedperimeterimo AT kimurashinji visualfieldtestingwithheadmountedperimeterimo AT yamanakakenzo visualfieldtestingwithheadmountedperimeterimo AT aiharamakoto visualfieldtestingwithheadmountedperimeterimo AT shimomurayoshikazu visualfieldtestingwithheadmountedperimeterimo |