Cargando…
Computational Investigation of the Interplay of Substrate Positioning and Reactivity in Catechol O-Methyltransferase
Catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) is a SAM- and Mg(2+)-dependent methyltransferase that regulates neurotransmitters through methylation. Simulations and experiments have identified divergent catecholamine substrate orientations in the COMT active site: molecular dynamics simulations have favored a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5001633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27564542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161868 |
_version_ | 1782450455661510656 |
---|---|
author | Patra, Niladri Ioannidis, Efthymios I. Kulik, Heather J. |
author_facet | Patra, Niladri Ioannidis, Efthymios I. Kulik, Heather J. |
author_sort | Patra, Niladri |
collection | PubMed |
description | Catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) is a SAM- and Mg(2+)-dependent methyltransferase that regulates neurotransmitters through methylation. Simulations and experiments have identified divergent catecholamine substrate orientations in the COMT active site: molecular dynamics simulations have favored a monodentate coordination of catecholate substrates to the active site Mg(2+), and crystal structures instead preserve bidentate coordination along with short (2.65 Å) methyl donor-acceptor distances. We carry out longer dynamics (up to 350 ns) to quantify interconversion between bidentate and monodentate binding poses. We provide a systematic determination of the relative free energy of the monodentate and bidentate structures in order to identify whether structural differences alter the nature of the methyl transfer mechanism and source of enzymatic rate enhancement. We demonstrate that the bidentate and monodentate binding modes are close in energy but separated by a 7 kcal/mol free energy barrier. Analysis of interactions in the two binding modes reveals that the driving force for monodentate catecholate orientations in classical molecular dynamics simulations is derived from stronger electrostatic stabilization afforded by alternate Mg(2+) coordination with strongly charged active site carboxylates. Mixed semi-empirical-classical (SQM/MM) substrate C-O distances (2.7 Å) for the bidentate case are in excellent agreement with COMT X-ray crystal structures, as long as charge transfer between the substrates, Mg(2+), and surrounding ligands is permitted. SQM/MM free energy barriers for methyl transfer from bidentate and monodentate catecholate configurations are comparable at around 21–22 kcal/mol, in good agreement with experiment (18–19 kcal/mol). Overall, the work suggests that both binding poses are viable for methyl transfer, and accurate descriptions of charge transfer and electrostatics are needed to provide balanced relative barriers when multiple binding poses are accessible, for example in other transferases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5001633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50016332016-09-12 Computational Investigation of the Interplay of Substrate Positioning and Reactivity in Catechol O-Methyltransferase Patra, Niladri Ioannidis, Efthymios I. Kulik, Heather J. PLoS One Research Article Catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) is a SAM- and Mg(2+)-dependent methyltransferase that regulates neurotransmitters through methylation. Simulations and experiments have identified divergent catecholamine substrate orientations in the COMT active site: molecular dynamics simulations have favored a monodentate coordination of catecholate substrates to the active site Mg(2+), and crystal structures instead preserve bidentate coordination along with short (2.65 Å) methyl donor-acceptor distances. We carry out longer dynamics (up to 350 ns) to quantify interconversion between bidentate and monodentate binding poses. We provide a systematic determination of the relative free energy of the monodentate and bidentate structures in order to identify whether structural differences alter the nature of the methyl transfer mechanism and source of enzymatic rate enhancement. We demonstrate that the bidentate and monodentate binding modes are close in energy but separated by a 7 kcal/mol free energy barrier. Analysis of interactions in the two binding modes reveals that the driving force for monodentate catecholate orientations in classical molecular dynamics simulations is derived from stronger electrostatic stabilization afforded by alternate Mg(2+) coordination with strongly charged active site carboxylates. Mixed semi-empirical-classical (SQM/MM) substrate C-O distances (2.7 Å) for the bidentate case are in excellent agreement with COMT X-ray crystal structures, as long as charge transfer between the substrates, Mg(2+), and surrounding ligands is permitted. SQM/MM free energy barriers for methyl transfer from bidentate and monodentate catecholate configurations are comparable at around 21–22 kcal/mol, in good agreement with experiment (18–19 kcal/mol). Overall, the work suggests that both binding poses are viable for methyl transfer, and accurate descriptions of charge transfer and electrostatics are needed to provide balanced relative barriers when multiple binding poses are accessible, for example in other transferases. Public Library of Science 2016-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5001633/ /pubmed/27564542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161868 Text en © 2016 Patra et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Patra, Niladri Ioannidis, Efthymios I. Kulik, Heather J. Computational Investigation of the Interplay of Substrate Positioning and Reactivity in Catechol O-Methyltransferase |
title | Computational Investigation of the Interplay of Substrate Positioning and Reactivity in Catechol O-Methyltransferase |
title_full | Computational Investigation of the Interplay of Substrate Positioning and Reactivity in Catechol O-Methyltransferase |
title_fullStr | Computational Investigation of the Interplay of Substrate Positioning and Reactivity in Catechol O-Methyltransferase |
title_full_unstemmed | Computational Investigation of the Interplay of Substrate Positioning and Reactivity in Catechol O-Methyltransferase |
title_short | Computational Investigation of the Interplay of Substrate Positioning and Reactivity in Catechol O-Methyltransferase |
title_sort | computational investigation of the interplay of substrate positioning and reactivity in catechol o-methyltransferase |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5001633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27564542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161868 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patraniladri computationalinvestigationoftheinterplayofsubstratepositioningandreactivityincatecholomethyltransferase AT ioannidisefthymiosi computationalinvestigationoftheinterplayofsubstratepositioningandreactivityincatecholomethyltransferase AT kulikheatherj computationalinvestigationoftheinterplayofsubstratepositioningandreactivityincatecholomethyltransferase |