Cargando…

Osteoporosis management in older patients who experienced a fracture

BACKGROUND: Fractures in older patients are common, morbid, and associated with increased risk of subsequent fractures. Inpatient and outpatient management and treatment of fractures can be costly. With more emphasis placed on quality care for Medicare beneficiaries, we studied if patients were rece...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oertel, Mark J, Graves, Leland, Al-Hihi, Eyad, Leonardo, Vincent, Hopkins, Christina, DeSouza, Kristin, Bhattacharya, Rajib K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5001657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27578967
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S107720
_version_ 1782450461181214720
author Oertel, Mark J
Graves, Leland
Al-Hihi, Eyad
Leonardo, Vincent
Hopkins, Christina
DeSouza, Kristin
Bhattacharya, Rajib K
author_facet Oertel, Mark J
Graves, Leland
Al-Hihi, Eyad
Leonardo, Vincent
Hopkins, Christina
DeSouza, Kristin
Bhattacharya, Rajib K
author_sort Oertel, Mark J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fractures in older patients are common, morbid, and associated with increased risk of subsequent fractures. Inpatient and outpatient management and treatment of fractures can be costly. With more emphasis placed on quality care for Medicare beneficiaries, we studied if patients were receiving proper screening for osteoporosis and treatment after diagnosis of fracture. This study aims to determine if adequate screening and treatment for osteoporosis occurs in the postfracture period. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of Medicare beneficiaries aged 67 years or older was gathered from a single institution in both inpatient and outpatient visits. Based on International Classification of Diseases ninth revision codes, primary diagnosis of fractures of neck and trunk, upper limb, and lower limb were obtained in addition to current procedural terminology codes for fracture procedures. We studied patients who had been screened for osteoporosis with a bone mineral study or received osteoporosis treatment after their fracture. RESULTS: Medicare beneficiaries totaling 1,375 patients were determined to have an inclusion fracture between June 1, 2013 and November 30, 2014. At the time of our analysis on December 1, 2014, 1,219 patients were living and included in the analysis. Of these patients, 256 (21.0%) either received osteoporosis testing with bone mineral density or received treatment for osteoporosis. On sex breakdown, 208/820 (25.4%) females received proper evaluation or treatment of osteoporosis in comparison to 48/399 (12.0%) males. This is in comparison to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ national average of 19.1% for osteoporosis management in females. CONCLUSION: A minority of studied patients received evaluation or treatment for osteoporosis after their fracture. Postfracture investigation and treatment for osteoporosis in Medicare beneficiaries is inadequate. If improved, Medicare costs could be reduced by prevention of future fractures. Future studies could determine how best to ensure this intervention occurs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5001657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50016572016-08-30 Osteoporosis management in older patients who experienced a fracture Oertel, Mark J Graves, Leland Al-Hihi, Eyad Leonardo, Vincent Hopkins, Christina DeSouza, Kristin Bhattacharya, Rajib K Clin Interv Aging Original Research BACKGROUND: Fractures in older patients are common, morbid, and associated with increased risk of subsequent fractures. Inpatient and outpatient management and treatment of fractures can be costly. With more emphasis placed on quality care for Medicare beneficiaries, we studied if patients were receiving proper screening for osteoporosis and treatment after diagnosis of fracture. This study aims to determine if adequate screening and treatment for osteoporosis occurs in the postfracture period. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of Medicare beneficiaries aged 67 years or older was gathered from a single institution in both inpatient and outpatient visits. Based on International Classification of Diseases ninth revision codes, primary diagnosis of fractures of neck and trunk, upper limb, and lower limb were obtained in addition to current procedural terminology codes for fracture procedures. We studied patients who had been screened for osteoporosis with a bone mineral study or received osteoporosis treatment after their fracture. RESULTS: Medicare beneficiaries totaling 1,375 patients were determined to have an inclusion fracture between June 1, 2013 and November 30, 2014. At the time of our analysis on December 1, 2014, 1,219 patients were living and included in the analysis. Of these patients, 256 (21.0%) either received osteoporosis testing with bone mineral density or received treatment for osteoporosis. On sex breakdown, 208/820 (25.4%) females received proper evaluation or treatment of osteoporosis in comparison to 48/399 (12.0%) males. This is in comparison to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ national average of 19.1% for osteoporosis management in females. CONCLUSION: A minority of studied patients received evaluation or treatment for osteoporosis after their fracture. Postfracture investigation and treatment for osteoporosis in Medicare beneficiaries is inadequate. If improved, Medicare costs could be reduced by prevention of future fractures. Future studies could determine how best to ensure this intervention occurs. Dove Medical Press 2016-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5001657/ /pubmed/27578967 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S107720 Text en © 2016 Oertel et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Oertel, Mark J
Graves, Leland
Al-Hihi, Eyad
Leonardo, Vincent
Hopkins, Christina
DeSouza, Kristin
Bhattacharya, Rajib K
Osteoporosis management in older patients who experienced a fracture
title Osteoporosis management in older patients who experienced a fracture
title_full Osteoporosis management in older patients who experienced a fracture
title_fullStr Osteoporosis management in older patients who experienced a fracture
title_full_unstemmed Osteoporosis management in older patients who experienced a fracture
title_short Osteoporosis management in older patients who experienced a fracture
title_sort osteoporosis management in older patients who experienced a fracture
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5001657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27578967
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S107720
work_keys_str_mv AT oertelmarkj osteoporosismanagementinolderpatientswhoexperiencedafracture
AT gravesleland osteoporosismanagementinolderpatientswhoexperiencedafracture
AT alhihieyad osteoporosismanagementinolderpatientswhoexperiencedafracture
AT leonardovincent osteoporosismanagementinolderpatientswhoexperiencedafracture
AT hopkinschristina osteoporosismanagementinolderpatientswhoexperiencedafracture
AT desouzakristin osteoporosismanagementinolderpatientswhoexperiencedafracture
AT bhattacharyarajibk osteoporosismanagementinolderpatientswhoexperiencedafracture