Cargando…
Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?
BACKGROUND: Evidence syntheses, and in particular systematic reviews (SRs), have become one of the cornerstones of evidence-based health care. The Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool has become the most widely used tool for investigating the methodological quality of SRs and is c...
Autores principales: | Wegewitz, Uta, Weikert, Beate, Fishta, Alba, Jacobs, Anja, Pieper, Dawid |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5002206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27566440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0183-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
How is AMSTAR applied by authors – a call for better reporting
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Measuring test-retest reliability (TRR) of AMSTAR provides moderate to perfect agreement – a contribution to the discussion of the importance of TRR in relation to the psychometric properties of assessment tools
por: Bühn, Stefanie, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Determinants of Sickness Absence and Return to Work Among Employees with Common Mental Disorders: A Scoping Review
por: de Vries, Haitze, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study
por: Matthias, Katja, et al.
Publicado: (2020)