Cargando…

Could kDNA-PCR in Peripheral Blood Replace the Examination of Bone Marrow for the Diagnosis of Visceral Leishmaniasis?

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the molecular (kDNA-PCR) and parasitological diagnosis in peripheral blood (PB) could replace the invasive and painful bone marrow collection (BM) in the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). PB from suspected VL patients was evaluated by parasitolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Godoy, Natalia Souza, Andrino, Marcos Luiz Alves, de Souza, Regina Maia, Gakiya, Erika, Amato, Valdir Sabbaga, Lindoso, José Ângelo Lauletta, Almeida Braz, Lucia Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5002284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27597892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1084353
_version_ 1782450545418567680
author de Godoy, Natalia Souza
Andrino, Marcos Luiz Alves
de Souza, Regina Maia
Gakiya, Erika
Amato, Valdir Sabbaga
Lindoso, José Ângelo Lauletta
Almeida Braz, Lucia Maria
author_facet de Godoy, Natalia Souza
Andrino, Marcos Luiz Alves
de Souza, Regina Maia
Gakiya, Erika
Amato, Valdir Sabbaga
Lindoso, José Ângelo Lauletta
Almeida Braz, Lucia Maria
author_sort de Godoy, Natalia Souza
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the molecular (kDNA-PCR) and parasitological diagnosis in peripheral blood (PB) could replace the invasive and painful bone marrow collection (BM) in the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). PB from suspected VL patients was evaluated by parasitological and molecular techniques using as the gold standard (GS) a combination of clinical, epidemiological, and immunochromatographic test (PB-rK39) results and parasitological examination of BM. Based on the GS, 38 samples from 32 patients were grouped: Group 1, 20 samples of VL cases, and Group 2, 18 samples of non-VL cases. In order to evaluate the parasitological and molecular techniques in PB, the samples were examined. From Group 1, PB kDNA-PCR was positive in 20 samples and in 19 of 20 in BM kDNA-PCR examination. However, the parasitological examination of buffy coat was insensitive, being able to detect only 4 cases from Group 1. All samples from Group 2 were negative. We concluded that, for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis, the parasitological examination of peripheral blood was not useful; however, molecular diagnosis by kDNA-PCR, performed in peripheral blood, could be useful to replace the parasitological examination of bone marrow.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5002284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50022842016-09-05 Could kDNA-PCR in Peripheral Blood Replace the Examination of Bone Marrow for the Diagnosis of Visceral Leishmaniasis? de Godoy, Natalia Souza Andrino, Marcos Luiz Alves de Souza, Regina Maia Gakiya, Erika Amato, Valdir Sabbaga Lindoso, José Ângelo Lauletta Almeida Braz, Lucia Maria J Parasitol Res Research Article The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the molecular (kDNA-PCR) and parasitological diagnosis in peripheral blood (PB) could replace the invasive and painful bone marrow collection (BM) in the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). PB from suspected VL patients was evaluated by parasitological and molecular techniques using as the gold standard (GS) a combination of clinical, epidemiological, and immunochromatographic test (PB-rK39) results and parasitological examination of BM. Based on the GS, 38 samples from 32 patients were grouped: Group 1, 20 samples of VL cases, and Group 2, 18 samples of non-VL cases. In order to evaluate the parasitological and molecular techniques in PB, the samples were examined. From Group 1, PB kDNA-PCR was positive in 20 samples and in 19 of 20 in BM kDNA-PCR examination. However, the parasitological examination of buffy coat was insensitive, being able to detect only 4 cases from Group 1. All samples from Group 2 were negative. We concluded that, for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis, the parasitological examination of peripheral blood was not useful; however, molecular diagnosis by kDNA-PCR, performed in peripheral blood, could be useful to replace the parasitological examination of bone marrow. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5002284/ /pubmed/27597892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1084353 Text en Copyright © 2016 Natalia Souza de Godoy et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Godoy, Natalia Souza
Andrino, Marcos Luiz Alves
de Souza, Regina Maia
Gakiya, Erika
Amato, Valdir Sabbaga
Lindoso, José Ângelo Lauletta
Almeida Braz, Lucia Maria
Could kDNA-PCR in Peripheral Blood Replace the Examination of Bone Marrow for the Diagnosis of Visceral Leishmaniasis?
title Could kDNA-PCR in Peripheral Blood Replace the Examination of Bone Marrow for the Diagnosis of Visceral Leishmaniasis?
title_full Could kDNA-PCR in Peripheral Blood Replace the Examination of Bone Marrow for the Diagnosis of Visceral Leishmaniasis?
title_fullStr Could kDNA-PCR in Peripheral Blood Replace the Examination of Bone Marrow for the Diagnosis of Visceral Leishmaniasis?
title_full_unstemmed Could kDNA-PCR in Peripheral Blood Replace the Examination of Bone Marrow for the Diagnosis of Visceral Leishmaniasis?
title_short Could kDNA-PCR in Peripheral Blood Replace the Examination of Bone Marrow for the Diagnosis of Visceral Leishmaniasis?
title_sort could kdna-pcr in peripheral blood replace the examination of bone marrow for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5002284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27597892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1084353
work_keys_str_mv AT degodoynataliasouza couldkdnapcrinperipheralbloodreplacetheexaminationofbonemarrowforthediagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasis
AT andrinomarcosluizalves couldkdnapcrinperipheralbloodreplacetheexaminationofbonemarrowforthediagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasis
AT desouzareginamaia couldkdnapcrinperipheralbloodreplacetheexaminationofbonemarrowforthediagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasis
AT gakiyaerika couldkdnapcrinperipheralbloodreplacetheexaminationofbonemarrowforthediagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasis
AT amatovaldirsabbaga couldkdnapcrinperipheralbloodreplacetheexaminationofbonemarrowforthediagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasis
AT lindosojoseangelolauletta couldkdnapcrinperipheralbloodreplacetheexaminationofbonemarrowforthediagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasis
AT almeidabrazluciamaria couldkdnapcrinperipheralbloodreplacetheexaminationofbonemarrowforthediagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasis