Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berg, Rigmor C., Odgaard-Jensen, Jan, Fretheim, Atle, Underland, Vigdis, Vist, Gunn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Letter to the Editor
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5002479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27599065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8376260
_version_ 1782450575415181312
author Berg, Rigmor C.
Odgaard-Jensen, Jan
Fretheim, Atle
Underland, Vigdis
Vist, Gunn
author_facet Berg, Rigmor C.
Odgaard-Jensen, Jan
Fretheim, Atle
Underland, Vigdis
Vist, Gunn
author_sort Berg, Rigmor C.
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5002479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50024792016-09-05 Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence Berg, Rigmor C. Odgaard-Jensen, Jan Fretheim, Atle Underland, Vigdis Vist, Gunn Obstet Gynecol Int Letter to the Editor Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5002479/ /pubmed/27599065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8376260 Text en Copyright © 2016 Rigmor C. Berg et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letter to the Editor
Berg, Rigmor C.
Odgaard-Jensen, Jan
Fretheim, Atle
Underland, Vigdis
Vist, Gunn
Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence
title Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence
title_full Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence
title_fullStr Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence
title_short Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence
title_sort response to: female genital mutilation and obstetric outcomes: flawed systematic review and meta-analysis does not accurately reflect the available evidence
topic Letter to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5002479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27599065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8376260
work_keys_str_mv AT bergrigmorc responsetofemalegenitalmutilationandobstetricoutcomesflawedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisdoesnotaccuratelyreflecttheavailableevidence
AT odgaardjensenjan responsetofemalegenitalmutilationandobstetricoutcomesflawedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisdoesnotaccuratelyreflecttheavailableevidence
AT fretheimatle responsetofemalegenitalmutilationandobstetricoutcomesflawedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisdoesnotaccuratelyreflecttheavailableevidence
AT underlandvigdis responsetofemalegenitalmutilationandobstetricoutcomesflawedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisdoesnotaccuratelyreflecttheavailableevidence
AT vistgunn responsetofemalegenitalmutilationandobstetricoutcomesflawedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisdoesnotaccuratelyreflecttheavailableevidence

Ejemplares similares