Cargando…
Does Emotional Intelligence have a “Dark” Side? A Review of the Literature
Emotional intelligence (EI) was once touted as the panacea for a satisfying and successful life. Consequently, there has been much emphasis on developing interventions to promote this personal resource in applied settings. Despite this, a growing body of research has begun to identify particular con...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5003940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27625627 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01316 |
_version_ | 1782450708385103872 |
---|---|
author | Davis, Sarah K. Nichols, Rachel |
author_facet | Davis, Sarah K. Nichols, Rachel |
author_sort | Davis, Sarah K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Emotional intelligence (EI) was once touted as the panacea for a satisfying and successful life. Consequently, there has been much emphasis on developing interventions to promote this personal resource in applied settings. Despite this, a growing body of research has begun to identify particular contexts when EI does not appear helpful and may even be deleterious to a person, or those they have contact with, suggesting a “dark” side to the construct. This paper provides a review of emergent literature to examine when, why and how trait and ability EI may contribute to negative intrapersonal (psychological ill-health; stress reactivity) and interpersonal outcomes (emotional manipulation; antisocial behavior). Negative effects were found to operate across multiple contexts (health, academic, occupational) however these were often indirect, suggesting that outcomes depend on pre-existing qualities of the person. Literature also points to the possibility of “optimal” levels of EI—both within and across EI constructs. Uneven profiles of self-perceptions (trait facets) or actual emotional skills contribute to poorer outcomes, particularly emotional awareness, and management. Moreover, individuals who possess high levels of skill but have lower self-perceptions of their abilities fare worse that those with more balanced profiles. Future research must now improve methodological and statistical practices to better capture EI in context and the negative corollary associated with high levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5003940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50039402016-09-13 Does Emotional Intelligence have a “Dark” Side? A Review of the Literature Davis, Sarah K. Nichols, Rachel Front Psychol Psychology Emotional intelligence (EI) was once touted as the panacea for a satisfying and successful life. Consequently, there has been much emphasis on developing interventions to promote this personal resource in applied settings. Despite this, a growing body of research has begun to identify particular contexts when EI does not appear helpful and may even be deleterious to a person, or those they have contact with, suggesting a “dark” side to the construct. This paper provides a review of emergent literature to examine when, why and how trait and ability EI may contribute to negative intrapersonal (psychological ill-health; stress reactivity) and interpersonal outcomes (emotional manipulation; antisocial behavior). Negative effects were found to operate across multiple contexts (health, academic, occupational) however these were often indirect, suggesting that outcomes depend on pre-existing qualities of the person. Literature also points to the possibility of “optimal” levels of EI—both within and across EI constructs. Uneven profiles of self-perceptions (trait facets) or actual emotional skills contribute to poorer outcomes, particularly emotional awareness, and management. Moreover, individuals who possess high levels of skill but have lower self-perceptions of their abilities fare worse that those with more balanced profiles. Future research must now improve methodological and statistical practices to better capture EI in context and the negative corollary associated with high levels. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5003940/ /pubmed/27625627 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01316 Text en Copyright © 2016 Davis and Nichols. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Davis, Sarah K. Nichols, Rachel Does Emotional Intelligence have a “Dark” Side? A Review of the Literature |
title | Does Emotional Intelligence have a “Dark” Side? A Review of the Literature |
title_full | Does Emotional Intelligence have a “Dark” Side? A Review of the Literature |
title_fullStr | Does Emotional Intelligence have a “Dark” Side? A Review of the Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Emotional Intelligence have a “Dark” Side? A Review of the Literature |
title_short | Does Emotional Intelligence have a “Dark” Side? A Review of the Literature |
title_sort | does emotional intelligence have a “dark” side? a review of the literature |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5003940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27625627 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davissarahk doesemotionalintelligencehaveadarksideareviewoftheliterature AT nicholsrachel doesemotionalintelligencehaveadarksideareviewoftheliterature |