Cargando…

The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory

How does the brain enable us to remember two or more object representations in visual working memory (VWM) without confusing them? This “gluing” process, or feature binding, refers to the ability to join certain features together while keeping them segregated from others. Recent neuroimaging researc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tseng, Philip, Chang, Yu-Ting, Chang, Chi-Fu, Liang, Wei-Kuang, Juan, Chi-Hung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27573864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32138
_version_ 1782450754046394368
author Tseng, Philip
Chang, Yu-Ting
Chang, Chi-Fu
Liang, Wei-Kuang
Juan, Chi-Hung
author_facet Tseng, Philip
Chang, Yu-Ting
Chang, Chi-Fu
Liang, Wei-Kuang
Juan, Chi-Hung
author_sort Tseng, Philip
collection PubMed
description How does the brain enable us to remember two or more object representations in visual working memory (VWM) without confusing them? This “gluing” process, or feature binding, refers to the ability to join certain features together while keeping them segregated from others. Recent neuroimaging research has reported higher BOLD response in the left temporal and parietal cortex during a binding-VWM task. However, less is known about how the two regions work in synchrony to support such process. In this study, we applied transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) over the left temporal and parietal cortex in gamma and theta frequency, with a phase difference of either 0° (in-phase) or 180° (anti-phase) to account for the different ways through which neural synchronization may occur. We found no facilitatory or inhibitory effect from sham, theta, and in-phase gamma stimulation. Importantly, there was an enhancement effect from anti-phase gamma tACS that was binding-specific, and such effect was only apparent in low-performing individuals who had room for improvement. Together, these results demonstrate that binding-VWM is supported by a temporally-precise oscillatory mechanism within the gamma frequency range, and that the advantageous 180°-apart phase relationship also implies a possible temporal driver-to-receiver time-lag between the temporal and parietal cortex.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5004173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50041732016-09-07 The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory Tseng, Philip Chang, Yu-Ting Chang, Chi-Fu Liang, Wei-Kuang Juan, Chi-Hung Sci Rep Article How does the brain enable us to remember two or more object representations in visual working memory (VWM) without confusing them? This “gluing” process, or feature binding, refers to the ability to join certain features together while keeping them segregated from others. Recent neuroimaging research has reported higher BOLD response in the left temporal and parietal cortex during a binding-VWM task. However, less is known about how the two regions work in synchrony to support such process. In this study, we applied transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) over the left temporal and parietal cortex in gamma and theta frequency, with a phase difference of either 0° (in-phase) or 180° (anti-phase) to account for the different ways through which neural synchronization may occur. We found no facilitatory or inhibitory effect from sham, theta, and in-phase gamma stimulation. Importantly, there was an enhancement effect from anti-phase gamma tACS that was binding-specific, and such effect was only apparent in low-performing individuals who had room for improvement. Together, these results demonstrate that binding-VWM is supported by a temporally-precise oscillatory mechanism within the gamma frequency range, and that the advantageous 180°-apart phase relationship also implies a possible temporal driver-to-receiver time-lag between the temporal and parietal cortex. Nature Publishing Group 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5004173/ /pubmed/27573864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32138 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Tseng, Philip
Chang, Yu-Ting
Chang, Chi-Fu
Liang, Wei-Kuang
Juan, Chi-Hung
The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory
title The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory
title_full The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory
title_fullStr The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory
title_full_unstemmed The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory
title_short The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory
title_sort critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27573864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32138
work_keys_str_mv AT tsengphilip thecriticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory
AT changyuting thecriticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory
AT changchifu thecriticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory
AT liangweikuang thecriticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory
AT juanchihung thecriticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory
AT tsengphilip criticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory
AT changyuting criticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory
AT changchifu criticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory
AT liangweikuang criticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory
AT juanchihung criticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory