Cargando…
The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory
How does the brain enable us to remember two or more object representations in visual working memory (VWM) without confusing them? This “gluing” process, or feature binding, refers to the ability to join certain features together while keeping them segregated from others. Recent neuroimaging researc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27573864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32138 |
_version_ | 1782450754046394368 |
---|---|
author | Tseng, Philip Chang, Yu-Ting Chang, Chi-Fu Liang, Wei-Kuang Juan, Chi-Hung |
author_facet | Tseng, Philip Chang, Yu-Ting Chang, Chi-Fu Liang, Wei-Kuang Juan, Chi-Hung |
author_sort | Tseng, Philip |
collection | PubMed |
description | How does the brain enable us to remember two or more object representations in visual working memory (VWM) without confusing them? This “gluing” process, or feature binding, refers to the ability to join certain features together while keeping them segregated from others. Recent neuroimaging research has reported higher BOLD response in the left temporal and parietal cortex during a binding-VWM task. However, less is known about how the two regions work in synchrony to support such process. In this study, we applied transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) over the left temporal and parietal cortex in gamma and theta frequency, with a phase difference of either 0° (in-phase) or 180° (anti-phase) to account for the different ways through which neural synchronization may occur. We found no facilitatory or inhibitory effect from sham, theta, and in-phase gamma stimulation. Importantly, there was an enhancement effect from anti-phase gamma tACS that was binding-specific, and such effect was only apparent in low-performing individuals who had room for improvement. Together, these results demonstrate that binding-VWM is supported by a temporally-precise oscillatory mechanism within the gamma frequency range, and that the advantageous 180°-apart phase relationship also implies a possible temporal driver-to-receiver time-lag between the temporal and parietal cortex. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5004173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50041732016-09-07 The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory Tseng, Philip Chang, Yu-Ting Chang, Chi-Fu Liang, Wei-Kuang Juan, Chi-Hung Sci Rep Article How does the brain enable us to remember two or more object representations in visual working memory (VWM) without confusing them? This “gluing” process, or feature binding, refers to the ability to join certain features together while keeping them segregated from others. Recent neuroimaging research has reported higher BOLD response in the left temporal and parietal cortex during a binding-VWM task. However, less is known about how the two regions work in synchrony to support such process. In this study, we applied transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) over the left temporal and parietal cortex in gamma and theta frequency, with a phase difference of either 0° (in-phase) or 180° (anti-phase) to account for the different ways through which neural synchronization may occur. We found no facilitatory or inhibitory effect from sham, theta, and in-phase gamma stimulation. Importantly, there was an enhancement effect from anti-phase gamma tACS that was binding-specific, and such effect was only apparent in low-performing individuals who had room for improvement. Together, these results demonstrate that binding-VWM is supported by a temporally-precise oscillatory mechanism within the gamma frequency range, and that the advantageous 180°-apart phase relationship also implies a possible temporal driver-to-receiver time-lag between the temporal and parietal cortex. Nature Publishing Group 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5004173/ /pubmed/27573864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32138 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Tseng, Philip Chang, Yu-Ting Chang, Chi-Fu Liang, Wei-Kuang Juan, Chi-Hung The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory |
title | The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory |
title_full | The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory |
title_fullStr | The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory |
title_full_unstemmed | The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory |
title_short | The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory |
title_sort | critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27573864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32138 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsengphilip thecriticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory AT changyuting thecriticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory AT changchifu thecriticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory AT liangweikuang thecriticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory AT juanchihung thecriticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory AT tsengphilip criticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory AT changyuting criticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory AT changchifu criticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory AT liangweikuang criticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory AT juanchihung criticalroleofphasedifferenceingammaoscillationwithinthetemporoparietalnetworkforbindingvisualworkingmemory |