Cargando…

Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesised that an ‘activitystat’ may biologically regulate energy expenditure or physical activity levels, thereby limiting the effectiveness of physical activity interventions. Using a randomised controlled trial design, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomersall, S. R., Maher, C., English, C., Rowlands, A. V., Dollman, J., Norton, K., Olds, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27576515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3568-x
_version_ 1782450777725337600
author Gomersall, S. R.
Maher, C.
English, C.
Rowlands, A. V.
Dollman, J.
Norton, K.
Olds, T.
author_facet Gomersall, S. R.
Maher, C.
English, C.
Rowlands, A. V.
Dollman, J.
Norton, K.
Olds, T.
author_sort Gomersall, S. R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesised that an ‘activitystat’ may biologically regulate energy expenditure or physical activity levels, thereby limiting the effectiveness of physical activity interventions. Using a randomised controlled trial design, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a six-week exercise stimulus on energy expenditure and physical activity, in order to empirically test this hypothesis. METHODS: Previously inactive adults (n = 129) [age (mean ± SD) 41 ± 11 year; body mass index 26.1 ± 5.2 kg/m(2)] were randomly allocated to a Control group (n = 43) or a 6-week Moderate (150 min/week) (n = 43) or Extensive (300 min/week) (n = 43) exercise intervention group. Energy expenditure and physical activity were measured using a combination of accelerometry (total counts, minutes spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity) and detailed time use recalls using the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults (total daily energy expenditure, minutes spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity) at baseline, mid- and end-intervention and 3- and 6-month follow up. Resting metabolic rate was measured at baseline and end-intervention using indirect calorimetry. Analysis was conducted using random effects mixed modeling. RESULTS: At end-intervention, there were statistically significant increases in all energy expenditure and physical activity variables according to both accelerometry and time use recalls (p < 0.001) in the Moderate and Extensive groups, relative to Controls. There was no significant change in resting metabolic rate (p = 0.78). CONCLUSION: Taken together, these results show no evidence of an “activitystat” effect. In the current study, imposed exercise stimuli of 150–300 min/week resulted in commensurate increases in overall energy expenditure and physical activity, with no sign of compensation in either of these constructs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12610000248066 (registered prospectively 24 March 2010)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5004298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50042982016-08-31 Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial Gomersall, S. R. Maher, C. English, C. Rowlands, A. V. Dollman, J. Norton, K. Olds, T. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesised that an ‘activitystat’ may biologically regulate energy expenditure or physical activity levels, thereby limiting the effectiveness of physical activity interventions. Using a randomised controlled trial design, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a six-week exercise stimulus on energy expenditure and physical activity, in order to empirically test this hypothesis. METHODS: Previously inactive adults (n = 129) [age (mean ± SD) 41 ± 11 year; body mass index 26.1 ± 5.2 kg/m(2)] were randomly allocated to a Control group (n = 43) or a 6-week Moderate (150 min/week) (n = 43) or Extensive (300 min/week) (n = 43) exercise intervention group. Energy expenditure and physical activity were measured using a combination of accelerometry (total counts, minutes spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity) and detailed time use recalls using the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults (total daily energy expenditure, minutes spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity) at baseline, mid- and end-intervention and 3- and 6-month follow up. Resting metabolic rate was measured at baseline and end-intervention using indirect calorimetry. Analysis was conducted using random effects mixed modeling. RESULTS: At end-intervention, there were statistically significant increases in all energy expenditure and physical activity variables according to both accelerometry and time use recalls (p < 0.001) in the Moderate and Extensive groups, relative to Controls. There was no significant change in resting metabolic rate (p = 0.78). CONCLUSION: Taken together, these results show no evidence of an “activitystat” effect. In the current study, imposed exercise stimuli of 150–300 min/week resulted in commensurate increases in overall energy expenditure and physical activity, with no sign of compensation in either of these constructs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12610000248066 (registered prospectively 24 March 2010) BioMed Central 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5004298/ /pubmed/27576515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3568-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gomersall, S. R.
Maher, C.
English, C.
Rowlands, A. V.
Dollman, J.
Norton, K.
Olds, T.
Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial
title Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27576515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3568-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gomersallsr testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT maherc testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT englishc testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rowlandsav testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dollmanj testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nortonk testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT oldst testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial