Cargando…
Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesised that an ‘activitystat’ may biologically regulate energy expenditure or physical activity levels, thereby limiting the effectiveness of physical activity interventions. Using a randomised controlled trial design, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27576515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3568-x |
_version_ | 1782450777725337600 |
---|---|
author | Gomersall, S. R. Maher, C. English, C. Rowlands, A. V. Dollman, J. Norton, K. Olds, T. |
author_facet | Gomersall, S. R. Maher, C. English, C. Rowlands, A. V. Dollman, J. Norton, K. Olds, T. |
author_sort | Gomersall, S. R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesised that an ‘activitystat’ may biologically regulate energy expenditure or physical activity levels, thereby limiting the effectiveness of physical activity interventions. Using a randomised controlled trial design, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a six-week exercise stimulus on energy expenditure and physical activity, in order to empirically test this hypothesis. METHODS: Previously inactive adults (n = 129) [age (mean ± SD) 41 ± 11 year; body mass index 26.1 ± 5.2 kg/m(2)] were randomly allocated to a Control group (n = 43) or a 6-week Moderate (150 min/week) (n = 43) or Extensive (300 min/week) (n = 43) exercise intervention group. Energy expenditure and physical activity were measured using a combination of accelerometry (total counts, minutes spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity) and detailed time use recalls using the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults (total daily energy expenditure, minutes spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity) at baseline, mid- and end-intervention and 3- and 6-month follow up. Resting metabolic rate was measured at baseline and end-intervention using indirect calorimetry. Analysis was conducted using random effects mixed modeling. RESULTS: At end-intervention, there were statistically significant increases in all energy expenditure and physical activity variables according to both accelerometry and time use recalls (p < 0.001) in the Moderate and Extensive groups, relative to Controls. There was no significant change in resting metabolic rate (p = 0.78). CONCLUSION: Taken together, these results show no evidence of an “activitystat” effect. In the current study, imposed exercise stimuli of 150–300 min/week resulted in commensurate increases in overall energy expenditure and physical activity, with no sign of compensation in either of these constructs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12610000248066 (registered prospectively 24 March 2010) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5004298 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50042982016-08-31 Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial Gomersall, S. R. Maher, C. English, C. Rowlands, A. V. Dollman, J. Norton, K. Olds, T. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesised that an ‘activitystat’ may biologically regulate energy expenditure or physical activity levels, thereby limiting the effectiveness of physical activity interventions. Using a randomised controlled trial design, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a six-week exercise stimulus on energy expenditure and physical activity, in order to empirically test this hypothesis. METHODS: Previously inactive adults (n = 129) [age (mean ± SD) 41 ± 11 year; body mass index 26.1 ± 5.2 kg/m(2)] were randomly allocated to a Control group (n = 43) or a 6-week Moderate (150 min/week) (n = 43) or Extensive (300 min/week) (n = 43) exercise intervention group. Energy expenditure and physical activity were measured using a combination of accelerometry (total counts, minutes spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity) and detailed time use recalls using the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults (total daily energy expenditure, minutes spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity) at baseline, mid- and end-intervention and 3- and 6-month follow up. Resting metabolic rate was measured at baseline and end-intervention using indirect calorimetry. Analysis was conducted using random effects mixed modeling. RESULTS: At end-intervention, there were statistically significant increases in all energy expenditure and physical activity variables according to both accelerometry and time use recalls (p < 0.001) in the Moderate and Extensive groups, relative to Controls. There was no significant change in resting metabolic rate (p = 0.78). CONCLUSION: Taken together, these results show no evidence of an “activitystat” effect. In the current study, imposed exercise stimuli of 150–300 min/week resulted in commensurate increases in overall energy expenditure and physical activity, with no sign of compensation in either of these constructs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12610000248066 (registered prospectively 24 March 2010) BioMed Central 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5004298/ /pubmed/27576515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3568-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gomersall, S. R. Maher, C. English, C. Rowlands, A. V. Dollman, J. Norton, K. Olds, T. Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial |
title | Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27576515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3568-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gomersallsr testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT maherc testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT englishc testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rowlandsav testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dollmanj testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nortonk testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT oldst testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial |