Cargando…

Microvesicles preparation from mesenchymal stem cells

Background: Extracellular vesicles are particles ranged from 30 nm to 5μm and subcategorized into three groups; exosomes, microvesicles and apoptotic bodies, each of which have different biological impact. Lack of a standard method for the detection and isolation of MVs has led to a challenging issu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rad, Fariba, Pourfathollah, Ali Akbar, Yari, Fatemeh, Mohammadi, Saeed, Kheirandish, Maryam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579288
_version_ 1782450795129602048
author Rad, Fariba
Pourfathollah, Ali Akbar
Yari, Fatemeh
Mohammadi, Saeed
Kheirandish, Maryam
author_facet Rad, Fariba
Pourfathollah, Ali Akbar
Yari, Fatemeh
Mohammadi, Saeed
Kheirandish, Maryam
author_sort Rad, Fariba
collection PubMed
description Background: Extracellular vesicles are particles ranged from 30 nm to 5μm and subcategorized into three groups; exosomes, microvesicles and apoptotic bodies, each of which have different biological impact. Lack of a standard method for the detection and isolation of MVs has led to a challenging issue that is a worth considering. In this study, we isolated MVs from the conditioned medium of UC-MSCs by four different schemes of ultracentrifugation. Methods: We examined the efficacy of differential centrifugation ranging from 10,000×g to 60,000×g on UCMSCs- derived microvesicles yield and purity. The fractions were evaluated by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) method, total protein quantification and flow cytometry. Results: UC-MSCs were spindle cells that adhered to plastic culture flasks. These cells expressed MSC markers such as CD44 and CD73, whereas were negative for hematopoietic markers CD45 and CD34. UC-MSCparticles were successfully isolated. Particles were heterogeneous vesicles of approximately 50 to 1250 nm in diameter that bear the surface-expressed molecules UC-MSCs such as; CD90, CD106, CD166 and CD44, and negative for CD34, CD63, and CD9. According to the results of DLS method, centrifugation at 10,000, 20,000, 40,000 and 60,000 ×g, all gave MVs of less than 1000 nm. It is of notion that only at the centrifugation rates of 40,000 and 60,000×g, particles of less than 100 nm in diameter were also obtained. Conclusion: The choice of exact speed greatly influences the purity of MVs and their yield. Our findings indicate that centrifugation at 20,000×g is appropriate for the purification of UC-MSC-MVs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5004526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50045262016-08-30 Microvesicles preparation from mesenchymal stem cells Rad, Fariba Pourfathollah, Ali Akbar Yari, Fatemeh Mohammadi, Saeed Kheirandish, Maryam Med J Islam Repub Iran Original Article Background: Extracellular vesicles are particles ranged from 30 nm to 5μm and subcategorized into three groups; exosomes, microvesicles and apoptotic bodies, each of which have different biological impact. Lack of a standard method for the detection and isolation of MVs has led to a challenging issue that is a worth considering. In this study, we isolated MVs from the conditioned medium of UC-MSCs by four different schemes of ultracentrifugation. Methods: We examined the efficacy of differential centrifugation ranging from 10,000×g to 60,000×g on UCMSCs- derived microvesicles yield and purity. The fractions were evaluated by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) method, total protein quantification and flow cytometry. Results: UC-MSCs were spindle cells that adhered to plastic culture flasks. These cells expressed MSC markers such as CD44 and CD73, whereas were negative for hematopoietic markers CD45 and CD34. UC-MSCparticles were successfully isolated. Particles were heterogeneous vesicles of approximately 50 to 1250 nm in diameter that bear the surface-expressed molecules UC-MSCs such as; CD90, CD106, CD166 and CD44, and negative for CD34, CD63, and CD9. According to the results of DLS method, centrifugation at 10,000, 20,000, 40,000 and 60,000 ×g, all gave MVs of less than 1000 nm. It is of notion that only at the centrifugation rates of 40,000 and 60,000×g, particles of less than 100 nm in diameter were also obtained. Conclusion: The choice of exact speed greatly influences the purity of MVs and their yield. Our findings indicate that centrifugation at 20,000×g is appropriate for the purification of UC-MSC-MVs. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2016-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5004526/ /pubmed/27579288 Text en © 2016 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rad, Fariba
Pourfathollah, Ali Akbar
Yari, Fatemeh
Mohammadi, Saeed
Kheirandish, Maryam
Microvesicles preparation from mesenchymal stem cells
title Microvesicles preparation from mesenchymal stem cells
title_full Microvesicles preparation from mesenchymal stem cells
title_fullStr Microvesicles preparation from mesenchymal stem cells
title_full_unstemmed Microvesicles preparation from mesenchymal stem cells
title_short Microvesicles preparation from mesenchymal stem cells
title_sort microvesicles preparation from mesenchymal stem cells
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579288
work_keys_str_mv AT radfariba microvesiclespreparationfrommesenchymalstemcells
AT pourfathollahaliakbar microvesiclespreparationfrommesenchymalstemcells
AT yarifatemeh microvesiclespreparationfrommesenchymalstemcells
AT mohammadisaeed microvesiclespreparationfrommesenchymalstemcells
AT kheirandishmaryam microvesiclespreparationfrommesenchymalstemcells