Cargando…
Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies
AIMS: Prior to implementing gene expression analyses from blood to a larger cohort study, an evaluation to set up a reliable and reproducible method is mandatory but challenging due to the specific characteristics of the samples as well as their collection methods. In this pilot study we optimized a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27575051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161778 |
_version_ | 1782450828576030720 |
---|---|
author | Meyer, Anke Paroni, Federico Günther, Kathrin Dharmadhikari, Gitanjali Ahrens, Wolfgang Kelm, Sørge Maedler, Kathrin |
author_facet | Meyer, Anke Paroni, Federico Günther, Kathrin Dharmadhikari, Gitanjali Ahrens, Wolfgang Kelm, Sørge Maedler, Kathrin |
author_sort | Meyer, Anke |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Prior to implementing gene expression analyses from blood to a larger cohort study, an evaluation to set up a reliable and reproducible method is mandatory but challenging due to the specific characteristics of the samples as well as their collection methods. In this pilot study we optimized a combination of blood sampling and RNA isolation methods and present reproducible gene expression results from human blood samples. METHODS: The established PAXgene(TM) blood collection method (Qiagen) was compared with the more recent Tempus(TM) collection and storing system. RNA from blood samples collected by both systems was extracted on columns with the corresponding Norgen and PAX RNA extraction Kits. RNA quantity and quality was compared photometrically, with Ribogreen and by Real-Time PCR analyses of various reference genes (PPIA, β-ACTIN and TUBULIN) and exemplary of SIGLEC-7. RESULTS: Combining different sampling methods and extraction kits caused strong variations in gene expression. The use of PAXgene(TM) and Tempus(TM) collection systems resulted in RNA of good quality and quantity for the respective RNA isolation system. No large inter-donor variations could be detected for both systems. However, it was not possible to extract sufficient RNA of good quality with the PAXgene(TM) RNA extraction system from samples collected by Tempus(TM) collection tubes. Comparing only the Norgen RNA extraction methods, RNA from blood collected either by the Tempus(TM) or PAXgene(TM) collection system delivered sufficient amount and quality of RNA, but the Tempus(TM) collection delivered higher RNA concentration compared to the PAX(TM) collection system. The established Pre-analytix PAXgene(TM) RNA extraction system together with the PAXgene(TM) blood collection system showed lowest C(T)-values, i.e. highest RNA concentration of good quality. Expression levels of all tested genes were stable and reproducible. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that it is not possible to mix or change sampling or extraction strategies during the same study because of large variations of RNA yield and expression levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5004844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50048442016-09-12 Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies Meyer, Anke Paroni, Federico Günther, Kathrin Dharmadhikari, Gitanjali Ahrens, Wolfgang Kelm, Sørge Maedler, Kathrin PLoS One Research Article AIMS: Prior to implementing gene expression analyses from blood to a larger cohort study, an evaluation to set up a reliable and reproducible method is mandatory but challenging due to the specific characteristics of the samples as well as their collection methods. In this pilot study we optimized a combination of blood sampling and RNA isolation methods and present reproducible gene expression results from human blood samples. METHODS: The established PAXgene(TM) blood collection method (Qiagen) was compared with the more recent Tempus(TM) collection and storing system. RNA from blood samples collected by both systems was extracted on columns with the corresponding Norgen and PAX RNA extraction Kits. RNA quantity and quality was compared photometrically, with Ribogreen and by Real-Time PCR analyses of various reference genes (PPIA, β-ACTIN and TUBULIN) and exemplary of SIGLEC-7. RESULTS: Combining different sampling methods and extraction kits caused strong variations in gene expression. The use of PAXgene(TM) and Tempus(TM) collection systems resulted in RNA of good quality and quantity for the respective RNA isolation system. No large inter-donor variations could be detected for both systems. However, it was not possible to extract sufficient RNA of good quality with the PAXgene(TM) RNA extraction system from samples collected by Tempus(TM) collection tubes. Comparing only the Norgen RNA extraction methods, RNA from blood collected either by the Tempus(TM) or PAXgene(TM) collection system delivered sufficient amount and quality of RNA, but the Tempus(TM) collection delivered higher RNA concentration compared to the PAX(TM) collection system. The established Pre-analytix PAXgene(TM) RNA extraction system together with the PAXgene(TM) blood collection system showed lowest C(T)-values, i.e. highest RNA concentration of good quality. Expression levels of all tested genes were stable and reproducible. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that it is not possible to mix or change sampling or extraction strategies during the same study because of large variations of RNA yield and expression levels. Public Library of Science 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5004844/ /pubmed/27575051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161778 Text en © 2016 Meyer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Meyer, Anke Paroni, Federico Günther, Kathrin Dharmadhikari, Gitanjali Ahrens, Wolfgang Kelm, Sørge Maedler, Kathrin Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies |
title | Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies |
title_full | Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies |
title_short | Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies |
title_sort | evaluation of existing methods for human blood mrna isolation and analysis for large studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27575051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161778 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meyeranke evaluationofexistingmethodsforhumanbloodmrnaisolationandanalysisforlargestudies AT paronifederico evaluationofexistingmethodsforhumanbloodmrnaisolationandanalysisforlargestudies AT guntherkathrin evaluationofexistingmethodsforhumanbloodmrnaisolationandanalysisforlargestudies AT dharmadhikarigitanjali evaluationofexistingmethodsforhumanbloodmrnaisolationandanalysisforlargestudies AT ahrenswolfgang evaluationofexistingmethodsforhumanbloodmrnaisolationandanalysisforlargestudies AT kelmsørge evaluationofexistingmethodsforhumanbloodmrnaisolationandanalysisforlargestudies AT maedlerkathrin evaluationofexistingmethodsforhumanbloodmrnaisolationandanalysisforlargestudies |