Cargando…

Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies

AIMS: Prior to implementing gene expression analyses from blood to a larger cohort study, an evaluation to set up a reliable and reproducible method is mandatory but challenging due to the specific characteristics of the samples as well as their collection methods. In this pilot study we optimized a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Anke, Paroni, Federico, Günther, Kathrin, Dharmadhikari, Gitanjali, Ahrens, Wolfgang, Kelm, Sørge, Maedler, Kathrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27575051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161778
_version_ 1782450828576030720
author Meyer, Anke
Paroni, Federico
Günther, Kathrin
Dharmadhikari, Gitanjali
Ahrens, Wolfgang
Kelm, Sørge
Maedler, Kathrin
author_facet Meyer, Anke
Paroni, Federico
Günther, Kathrin
Dharmadhikari, Gitanjali
Ahrens, Wolfgang
Kelm, Sørge
Maedler, Kathrin
author_sort Meyer, Anke
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Prior to implementing gene expression analyses from blood to a larger cohort study, an evaluation to set up a reliable and reproducible method is mandatory but challenging due to the specific characteristics of the samples as well as their collection methods. In this pilot study we optimized a combination of blood sampling and RNA isolation methods and present reproducible gene expression results from human blood samples. METHODS: The established PAXgene(TM) blood collection method (Qiagen) was compared with the more recent Tempus(TM) collection and storing system. RNA from blood samples collected by both systems was extracted on columns with the corresponding Norgen and PAX RNA extraction Kits. RNA quantity and quality was compared photometrically, with Ribogreen and by Real-Time PCR analyses of various reference genes (PPIA, β-ACTIN and TUBULIN) and exemplary of SIGLEC-7. RESULTS: Combining different sampling methods and extraction kits caused strong variations in gene expression. The use of PAXgene(TM) and Tempus(TM) collection systems resulted in RNA of good quality and quantity for the respective RNA isolation system. No large inter-donor variations could be detected for both systems. However, it was not possible to extract sufficient RNA of good quality with the PAXgene(TM) RNA extraction system from samples collected by Tempus(TM) collection tubes. Comparing only the Norgen RNA extraction methods, RNA from blood collected either by the Tempus(TM) or PAXgene(TM) collection system delivered sufficient amount and quality of RNA, but the Tempus(TM) collection delivered higher RNA concentration compared to the PAX(TM) collection system. The established Pre-analytix PAXgene(TM) RNA extraction system together with the PAXgene(TM) blood collection system showed lowest C(T)-values, i.e. highest RNA concentration of good quality. Expression levels of all tested genes were stable and reproducible. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that it is not possible to mix or change sampling or extraction strategies during the same study because of large variations of RNA yield and expression levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5004844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50048442016-09-12 Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies Meyer, Anke Paroni, Federico Günther, Kathrin Dharmadhikari, Gitanjali Ahrens, Wolfgang Kelm, Sørge Maedler, Kathrin PLoS One Research Article AIMS: Prior to implementing gene expression analyses from blood to a larger cohort study, an evaluation to set up a reliable and reproducible method is mandatory but challenging due to the specific characteristics of the samples as well as their collection methods. In this pilot study we optimized a combination of blood sampling and RNA isolation methods and present reproducible gene expression results from human blood samples. METHODS: The established PAXgene(TM) blood collection method (Qiagen) was compared with the more recent Tempus(TM) collection and storing system. RNA from blood samples collected by both systems was extracted on columns with the corresponding Norgen and PAX RNA extraction Kits. RNA quantity and quality was compared photometrically, with Ribogreen and by Real-Time PCR analyses of various reference genes (PPIA, β-ACTIN and TUBULIN) and exemplary of SIGLEC-7. RESULTS: Combining different sampling methods and extraction kits caused strong variations in gene expression. The use of PAXgene(TM) and Tempus(TM) collection systems resulted in RNA of good quality and quantity for the respective RNA isolation system. No large inter-donor variations could be detected for both systems. However, it was not possible to extract sufficient RNA of good quality with the PAXgene(TM) RNA extraction system from samples collected by Tempus(TM) collection tubes. Comparing only the Norgen RNA extraction methods, RNA from blood collected either by the Tempus(TM) or PAXgene(TM) collection system delivered sufficient amount and quality of RNA, but the Tempus(TM) collection delivered higher RNA concentration compared to the PAX(TM) collection system. The established Pre-analytix PAXgene(TM) RNA extraction system together with the PAXgene(TM) blood collection system showed lowest C(T)-values, i.e. highest RNA concentration of good quality. Expression levels of all tested genes were stable and reproducible. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that it is not possible to mix or change sampling or extraction strategies during the same study because of large variations of RNA yield and expression levels. Public Library of Science 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5004844/ /pubmed/27575051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161778 Text en © 2016 Meyer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meyer, Anke
Paroni, Federico
Günther, Kathrin
Dharmadhikari, Gitanjali
Ahrens, Wolfgang
Kelm, Sørge
Maedler, Kathrin
Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies
title Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies
title_full Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies
title_fullStr Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies
title_short Evaluation of Existing Methods for Human Blood mRNA Isolation and Analysis for Large Studies
title_sort evaluation of existing methods for human blood mrna isolation and analysis for large studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27575051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161778
work_keys_str_mv AT meyeranke evaluationofexistingmethodsforhumanbloodmrnaisolationandanalysisforlargestudies
AT paronifederico evaluationofexistingmethodsforhumanbloodmrnaisolationandanalysisforlargestudies
AT guntherkathrin evaluationofexistingmethodsforhumanbloodmrnaisolationandanalysisforlargestudies
AT dharmadhikarigitanjali evaluationofexistingmethodsforhumanbloodmrnaisolationandanalysisforlargestudies
AT ahrenswolfgang evaluationofexistingmethodsforhumanbloodmrnaisolationandanalysisforlargestudies
AT kelmsørge evaluationofexistingmethodsforhumanbloodmrnaisolationandanalysisforlargestudies
AT maedlerkathrin evaluationofexistingmethodsforhumanbloodmrnaisolationandanalysisforlargestudies