Cargando…
Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Blood presence in apical surgery can prevent the correct vision of the surgical field, change the physical properties of filling materials and reduce their sealing ability. OBJETIVE: To describe which are the most effective and safest haemostatic agents to control bleeding in patients un...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27475689 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21109 |
_version_ | 1782450861140606976 |
---|---|
author | Clé-Ovejero, Adrià Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard |
author_facet | Clé-Ovejero, Adrià Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard |
author_sort | Clé-Ovejero, Adrià |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Blood presence in apical surgery can prevent the correct vision of the surgical field, change the physical properties of filling materials and reduce their sealing ability. OBJETIVE: To describe which are the most effective and safest haemostatic agents to control bleeding in patients undergoing apical surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: TWe carried out a systematic review, using Medline and Cochrane Library databases, of human clinical studies published in the last 10 years. RESULTS: The agents that proved more effective in bleeding control were calcium sulphate (100%) and collagen plus epinephrine (92.9%) followed by ferric sulphate (60%), gauze packing (30%) and collagen (16.7%). When using aluminium chloride (Expasyl®), over 90% of the apical lesions improved, but this agent seemed to increase swelling. Epinephrine with collagen did not significantly raise either blood pressure or heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the use of several haemostatic materials in apical surgery, there is little evidence on their effectiveness and safety. The most effective haemostatic agents were calcium sulphate and epinephrine plus collagen. Epinephrine plus collagen did not seem to significantly raise blood pressure or heart rate during surgery. Aluminium chloride did not increase postoperative pain but could slightly increase postoperative swelling. Randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the haemostatic effectiveness and adverse effects of haemostatic materials in apical surgery. Key words:Haemostasis, apical surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5005106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50051062016-09-01 Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review Clé-Ovejero, Adrià Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Review BACKGROUND: Blood presence in apical surgery can prevent the correct vision of the surgical field, change the physical properties of filling materials and reduce their sealing ability. OBJETIVE: To describe which are the most effective and safest haemostatic agents to control bleeding in patients undergoing apical surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: TWe carried out a systematic review, using Medline and Cochrane Library databases, of human clinical studies published in the last 10 years. RESULTS: The agents that proved more effective in bleeding control were calcium sulphate (100%) and collagen plus epinephrine (92.9%) followed by ferric sulphate (60%), gauze packing (30%) and collagen (16.7%). When using aluminium chloride (Expasyl®), over 90% of the apical lesions improved, but this agent seemed to increase swelling. Epinephrine with collagen did not significantly raise either blood pressure or heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the use of several haemostatic materials in apical surgery, there is little evidence on their effectiveness and safety. The most effective haemostatic agents were calcium sulphate and epinephrine plus collagen. Epinephrine plus collagen did not seem to significantly raise blood pressure or heart rate during surgery. Aluminium chloride did not increase postoperative pain but could slightly increase postoperative swelling. Randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the haemostatic effectiveness and adverse effects of haemostatic materials in apical surgery. Key words:Haemostasis, apical surgery. Medicina Oral S.L. 2016-09 2016-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5005106/ /pubmed/27475689 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21109 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Clé-Ovejero, Adrià Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review |
title | Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review |
title_full | Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review |
title_short | Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review |
title_sort | haemostatic agents in apical surgery. a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27475689 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cleovejeroadria haemostaticagentsinapicalsurgeryasystematicreview AT valmasedacastelloneduard haemostaticagentsinapicalsurgeryasystematicreview |