Cargando…

Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Blood presence in apical surgery can prevent the correct vision of the surgical field, change the physical properties of filling materials and reduce their sealing ability. OBJETIVE: To describe which are the most effective and safest haemostatic agents to control bleeding in patients un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clé-Ovejero, Adrià, Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27475689
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21109
_version_ 1782450861140606976
author Clé-Ovejero, Adrià
Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard
author_facet Clé-Ovejero, Adrià
Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard
author_sort Clé-Ovejero, Adrià
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood presence in apical surgery can prevent the correct vision of the surgical field, change the physical properties of filling materials and reduce their sealing ability. OBJETIVE: To describe which are the most effective and safest haemostatic agents to control bleeding in patients undergoing apical surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: TWe carried out a systematic review, using Medline and Cochrane Library databases, of human clinical studies published in the last 10 years. RESULTS: The agents that proved more effective in bleeding control were calcium sulphate (100%) and collagen plus epinephrine (92.9%) followed by ferric sulphate (60%), gauze packing (30%) and collagen (16.7%). When using aluminium chloride (Expasyl®), over 90% of the apical lesions improved, but this agent seemed to increase swelling. Epinephrine with collagen did not significantly raise either blood pressure or heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the use of several haemostatic materials in apical surgery, there is little evidence on their effectiveness and safety. The most effective haemostatic agents were calcium sulphate and epinephrine plus collagen. Epinephrine plus collagen did not seem to significantly raise blood pressure or heart rate during surgery. Aluminium chloride did not increase postoperative pain but could slightly increase postoperative swelling. Randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the haemostatic effectiveness and adverse effects of haemostatic materials in apical surgery. Key words:Haemostasis, apical surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5005106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50051062016-09-01 Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review Clé-Ovejero, Adrià Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Review BACKGROUND: Blood presence in apical surgery can prevent the correct vision of the surgical field, change the physical properties of filling materials and reduce their sealing ability. OBJETIVE: To describe which are the most effective and safest haemostatic agents to control bleeding in patients undergoing apical surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: TWe carried out a systematic review, using Medline and Cochrane Library databases, of human clinical studies published in the last 10 years. RESULTS: The agents that proved more effective in bleeding control were calcium sulphate (100%) and collagen plus epinephrine (92.9%) followed by ferric sulphate (60%), gauze packing (30%) and collagen (16.7%). When using aluminium chloride (Expasyl®), over 90% of the apical lesions improved, but this agent seemed to increase swelling. Epinephrine with collagen did not significantly raise either blood pressure or heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the use of several haemostatic materials in apical surgery, there is little evidence on their effectiveness and safety. The most effective haemostatic agents were calcium sulphate and epinephrine plus collagen. Epinephrine plus collagen did not seem to significantly raise blood pressure or heart rate during surgery. Aluminium chloride did not increase postoperative pain but could slightly increase postoperative swelling. Randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the haemostatic effectiveness and adverse effects of haemostatic materials in apical surgery. Key words:Haemostasis, apical surgery. Medicina Oral S.L. 2016-09 2016-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5005106/ /pubmed/27475689 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21109 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Clé-Ovejero, Adrià
Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard
Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review
title Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review
title_full Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review
title_fullStr Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review
title_short Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review
title_sort haemostatic agents in apical surgery. a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27475689
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21109
work_keys_str_mv AT cleovejeroadria haemostaticagentsinapicalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT valmasedacastelloneduard haemostaticagentsinapicalsurgeryasystematicreview