Cargando…
A randomised, open-label study of umeclidinium versus glycopyrronium in patients with COPD
This study compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily umeclidinium 62.5 µg with once-daily glycopyrronium 50 µg in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This was a 12-week, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group study (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT0223661...
Autores principales: | Rheault, Tara, Khindri, Sanjeev, Vahdati-Bolouri, Mitra, Church, Alison, Fahy, William A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27730198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00101-2015 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A randomized, blinded study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium 62.5 μg compared with tiotropium 18 μg in patients with COPD
por: Feldman, Gregory, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium and salmeterol monotherapies in symptomatic patients with COPD not receiving inhaled corticosteroids: the EMAX randomised trial
por: Maltais, François, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in COPD: a randomised trial
por: Singh, Dave, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Prevention of clinically important deteriorations in COPD with umeclidinium/vilanterol
por: Singh, Dave, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The effect of umeclidinium added to inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β(2)-agonist in patients with symptomatic COPD: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study
por: Sousa, Ana R, et al.
Publicado: (2016)