Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience
OBJECTIVE: The coronary sinus Reducer is a recently introduced device to treat patients with severe angina symptoms refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable for conventional revascularisation. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the Reducer in a real-world cohort of patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27299456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0862-2 |
_version_ | 1782450879878660096 |
---|---|
author | Abawi, M. Nijhoff, F. Stella, P.R. Voskuil, M. Benedetto, D. Doevendans, P.A. Agostoni, P. |
author_facet | Abawi, M. Nijhoff, F. Stella, P.R. Voskuil, M. Benedetto, D. Doevendans, P.A. Agostoni, P. |
author_sort | Abawi, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The coronary sinus Reducer is a recently introduced device to treat patients with severe angina symptoms refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable for conventional revascularisation. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the Reducer in a real-world cohort of patients with refractory angina. METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective registry. Patients with severe angina symptoms, objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia using any adequate non-invasive modality and without options for conventional revascularisation were regarded eligible for Reducer implantation. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (74 % male, mean age 70 ± 8 years, 91.3 % previous bypass surgery, 82.6 % previous percutaneous intervention, 47.8 % previous myocardial infarction, 52.2 % diabetes mellitus) underwent Reducer implantation. The safety endpoint (successful implantation of the first device without device-related adverse events) was met in all patients. After a median follow-up of 9 (8–14) months the efficacy (any reduction in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class and revascularisation-free survival) was reached in 17 patients (74 %): 8 patients (34.8 %) improved by 1 CCS class, 7 (30.4 %) by 2 CCS classes and 2 (8.7 %) by 3 CCS classes. One patient died 4 months after implantation because of progressive heart failure (not associated with Reducer implantation). CONCLUSION: In this single-centre real-world experience, Reducer implantation was safe and demonstrated excellent clinical efficacy in the treatment of refractory angina at mid-term follow-up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5005194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50051942016-09-15 Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience Abawi, M. Nijhoff, F. Stella, P.R. Voskuil, M. Benedetto, D. Doevendans, P.A. Agostoni, P. Neth Heart J Original Article OBJECTIVE: The coronary sinus Reducer is a recently introduced device to treat patients with severe angina symptoms refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable for conventional revascularisation. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the Reducer in a real-world cohort of patients with refractory angina. METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective registry. Patients with severe angina symptoms, objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia using any adequate non-invasive modality and without options for conventional revascularisation were regarded eligible for Reducer implantation. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (74 % male, mean age 70 ± 8 years, 91.3 % previous bypass surgery, 82.6 % previous percutaneous intervention, 47.8 % previous myocardial infarction, 52.2 % diabetes mellitus) underwent Reducer implantation. The safety endpoint (successful implantation of the first device without device-related adverse events) was met in all patients. After a median follow-up of 9 (8–14) months the efficacy (any reduction in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class and revascularisation-free survival) was reached in 17 patients (74 %): 8 patients (34.8 %) improved by 1 CCS class, 7 (30.4 %) by 2 CCS classes and 2 (8.7 %) by 3 CCS classes. One patient died 4 months after implantation because of progressive heart failure (not associated with Reducer implantation). CONCLUSION: In this single-centre real-world experience, Reducer implantation was safe and demonstrated excellent clinical efficacy in the treatment of refractory angina at mid-term follow-up. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2016-06-14 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5005194/ /pubmed/27299456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0862-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Abawi, M. Nijhoff, F. Stella, P.R. Voskuil, M. Benedetto, D. Doevendans, P.A. Agostoni, P. Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience |
title | Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: a single-centre real-world experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27299456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0862-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abawim safetyandefficacyofadevicetonarrowthecoronarysinusforthetreatmentofrefractoryanginaasinglecentrerealworldexperience AT nijhofff safetyandefficacyofadevicetonarrowthecoronarysinusforthetreatmentofrefractoryanginaasinglecentrerealworldexperience AT stellapr safetyandefficacyofadevicetonarrowthecoronarysinusforthetreatmentofrefractoryanginaasinglecentrerealworldexperience AT voskuilm safetyandefficacyofadevicetonarrowthecoronarysinusforthetreatmentofrefractoryanginaasinglecentrerealworldexperience AT benedettod safetyandefficacyofadevicetonarrowthecoronarysinusforthetreatmentofrefractoryanginaasinglecentrerealworldexperience AT doevendanspa safetyandefficacyofadevicetonarrowthecoronarysinusforthetreatmentofrefractoryanginaasinglecentrerealworldexperience AT agostonip safetyandefficacyofadevicetonarrowthecoronarysinusforthetreatmentofrefractoryanginaasinglecentrerealworldexperience |