Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience

OBJECTIVE: The coronary sinus Reducer is a recently introduced device to treat patients with severe angina symptoms refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable for conventional revascularisation. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the Reducer in a real-world cohort of patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abawi, M., Nijhoff, F., Stella, P.R., Voskuil, M., Benedetto, D., Doevendans, P.A., Agostoni, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27299456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0862-2
_version_ 1782450879878660096
author Abawi, M.
Nijhoff, F.
Stella, P.R.
Voskuil, M.
Benedetto, D.
Doevendans, P.A.
Agostoni, P.
author_facet Abawi, M.
Nijhoff, F.
Stella, P.R.
Voskuil, M.
Benedetto, D.
Doevendans, P.A.
Agostoni, P.
author_sort Abawi, M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The coronary sinus Reducer is a recently introduced device to treat patients with severe angina symptoms refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable for conventional revascularisation. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the Reducer in a real-world cohort of patients with refractory angina. METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective registry. Patients with severe angina symptoms, objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia using any adequate non-invasive modality and without options for conventional revascularisation were regarded eligible for Reducer implantation. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (74 % male, mean age 70 ± 8 years, 91.3 % previous bypass surgery, 82.6 % previous percutaneous intervention, 47.8 % previous myocardial infarction, 52.2 % diabetes mellitus) underwent Reducer implantation. The safety endpoint (successful implantation of the first device without device-related adverse events) was met in all patients. After a median follow-up of 9 (8–14) months the efficacy (any reduction in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class and revascularisation-free survival) was reached in 17 patients (74 %): 8 patients (34.8 %) improved by 1 CCS class, 7 (30.4 %) by 2 CCS classes and 2 (8.7 %) by 3 CCS classes. One patient died 4 months after implantation because of progressive heart failure (not associated with Reducer implantation). CONCLUSION: In this single-centre real-world experience, Reducer implantation was safe and demonstrated excellent clinical efficacy in the treatment of refractory angina at mid-term follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5005194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50051942016-09-15 Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience Abawi, M. Nijhoff, F. Stella, P.R. Voskuil, M. Benedetto, D. Doevendans, P.A. Agostoni, P. Neth Heart J Original Article OBJECTIVE: The coronary sinus Reducer is a recently introduced device to treat patients with severe angina symptoms refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable for conventional revascularisation. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the Reducer in a real-world cohort of patients with refractory angina. METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective registry. Patients with severe angina symptoms, objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia using any adequate non-invasive modality and without options for conventional revascularisation were regarded eligible for Reducer implantation. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (74 % male, mean age 70 ± 8 years, 91.3 % previous bypass surgery, 82.6 % previous percutaneous intervention, 47.8 % previous myocardial infarction, 52.2 % diabetes mellitus) underwent Reducer implantation. The safety endpoint (successful implantation of the first device without device-related adverse events) was met in all patients. After a median follow-up of 9 (8–14) months the efficacy (any reduction in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class and revascularisation-free survival) was reached in 17 patients (74 %): 8 patients (34.8 %) improved by 1 CCS class, 7 (30.4 %) by 2 CCS classes and 2 (8.7 %) by 3 CCS classes. One patient died 4 months after implantation because of progressive heart failure (not associated with Reducer implantation). CONCLUSION: In this single-centre real-world experience, Reducer implantation was safe and demonstrated excellent clinical efficacy in the treatment of refractory angina at mid-term follow-up. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2016-06-14 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5005194/ /pubmed/27299456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0862-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abawi, M.
Nijhoff, F.
Stella, P.R.
Voskuil, M.
Benedetto, D.
Doevendans, P.A.
Agostoni, P.
Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience
title Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience
title_full Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience
title_short Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience
title_sort safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: a single-centre real-world experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27299456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0862-2
work_keys_str_mv AT abawim safetyandefficacyofadevicetonarrowthecoronarysinusforthetreatmentofrefractoryanginaasinglecentrerealworldexperience
AT nijhofff safetyandefficacyofadevicetonarrowthecoronarysinusforthetreatmentofrefractoryanginaasinglecentrerealworldexperience
AT stellapr safetyandefficacyofadevicetonarrowthecoronarysinusforthetreatmentofrefractoryanginaasinglecentrerealworldexperience
AT voskuilm safetyandefficacyofadevicetonarrowthecoronarysinusforthetreatmentofrefractoryanginaasinglecentrerealworldexperience
AT benedettod safetyandefficacyofadevicetonarrowthecoronarysinusforthetreatmentofrefractoryanginaasinglecentrerealworldexperience
AT doevendanspa safetyandefficacyofadevicetonarrowthecoronarysinusforthetreatmentofrefractoryanginaasinglecentrerealworldexperience
AT agostonip safetyandefficacyofadevicetonarrowthecoronarysinusforthetreatmentofrefractoryanginaasinglecentrerealworldexperience