Cargando…

Magnetic resonance imaging features of massive ovarian edema in pregnancy: utility for decisions in expectant management

INTRODUCTION: Massive ovarian edema (MOE) is a rare disease and few reports have described the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging manifestations in pregnancy. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report here a case of MOE in a patient at 12 weeks’ gestation. Abdominal T2-weighted MR images showed asymmetric ovarian en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gobara, Aiko, Yoshizako, Takeshi, Yoshida, Rika, Okada, Naruhito, Makihara, Ken, Kitagaki, Hajime
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3123-3
_version_ 1782450882395242496
author Gobara, Aiko
Yoshizako, Takeshi
Yoshida, Rika
Okada, Naruhito
Makihara, Ken
Kitagaki, Hajime
author_facet Gobara, Aiko
Yoshizako, Takeshi
Yoshida, Rika
Okada, Naruhito
Makihara, Ken
Kitagaki, Hajime
author_sort Gobara, Aiko
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Massive ovarian edema (MOE) is a rare disease and few reports have described the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging manifestations in pregnancy. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report here a case of MOE in a patient at 12 weeks’ gestation. Abdominal T2-weighted MR images showed asymmetric ovarian enlargement in a teardrop configuration, hyperintense peripherally displaced follicles, and twisting of the vascular pedicle between the enlarged ovary and uterus. The diagnosis of MOE due to ovarian torsion was confirmed by exploratory laparotomy. Preoperative imaging, especially the MR imaging could distinguish MOE from other conditions and demonstrate the relations of adjunct organ, and allowed for untwisting during laparotomy with successful preservation of the ovary. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: Ultrasonography is important in detecting, evaluating, and determining the malignant potential of adnexal masses in pregnancy, but its findings may be nonspecific and then MR may assist characterization. This case was tentatively diagnosed as typical MOE by preoperative imaging, but the shape and location of the hugely enlarged ovarian mass suggested torsion of the ovarian pedicle. In our case, the diagnosis was confirmed by exploratory laparotomy and the pedicle was successfully untwisted. CONCLUSION: MR imaging proved useful for decisions on expectant management of MOE in pregnancy, and the patient’s affected ovary could be preserved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5005219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50052192016-09-20 Magnetic resonance imaging features of massive ovarian edema in pregnancy: utility for decisions in expectant management Gobara, Aiko Yoshizako, Takeshi Yoshida, Rika Okada, Naruhito Makihara, Ken Kitagaki, Hajime Springerplus Case Study INTRODUCTION: Massive ovarian edema (MOE) is a rare disease and few reports have described the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging manifestations in pregnancy. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report here a case of MOE in a patient at 12 weeks’ gestation. Abdominal T2-weighted MR images showed asymmetric ovarian enlargement in a teardrop configuration, hyperintense peripherally displaced follicles, and twisting of the vascular pedicle between the enlarged ovary and uterus. The diagnosis of MOE due to ovarian torsion was confirmed by exploratory laparotomy. Preoperative imaging, especially the MR imaging could distinguish MOE from other conditions and demonstrate the relations of adjunct organ, and allowed for untwisting during laparotomy with successful preservation of the ovary. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: Ultrasonography is important in detecting, evaluating, and determining the malignant potential of adnexal masses in pregnancy, but its findings may be nonspecific and then MR may assist characterization. This case was tentatively diagnosed as typical MOE by preoperative imaging, but the shape and location of the hugely enlarged ovarian mass suggested torsion of the ovarian pedicle. In our case, the diagnosis was confirmed by exploratory laparotomy and the pedicle was successfully untwisted. CONCLUSION: MR imaging proved useful for decisions on expectant management of MOE in pregnancy, and the patient’s affected ovary could be preserved. Springer International Publishing 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5005219/ /pubmed/27652020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3123-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Case Study
Gobara, Aiko
Yoshizako, Takeshi
Yoshida, Rika
Okada, Naruhito
Makihara, Ken
Kitagaki, Hajime
Magnetic resonance imaging features of massive ovarian edema in pregnancy: utility for decisions in expectant management
title Magnetic resonance imaging features of massive ovarian edema in pregnancy: utility for decisions in expectant management
title_full Magnetic resonance imaging features of massive ovarian edema in pregnancy: utility for decisions in expectant management
title_fullStr Magnetic resonance imaging features of massive ovarian edema in pregnancy: utility for decisions in expectant management
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic resonance imaging features of massive ovarian edema in pregnancy: utility for decisions in expectant management
title_short Magnetic resonance imaging features of massive ovarian edema in pregnancy: utility for decisions in expectant management
title_sort magnetic resonance imaging features of massive ovarian edema in pregnancy: utility for decisions in expectant management
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3123-3
work_keys_str_mv AT gobaraaiko magneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofmassiveovarianedemainpregnancyutilityfordecisionsinexpectantmanagement
AT yoshizakotakeshi magneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofmassiveovarianedemainpregnancyutilityfordecisionsinexpectantmanagement
AT yoshidarika magneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofmassiveovarianedemainpregnancyutilityfordecisionsinexpectantmanagement
AT okadanaruhito magneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofmassiveovarianedemainpregnancyutilityfordecisionsinexpectantmanagement
AT makiharaken magneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofmassiveovarianedemainpregnancyutilityfordecisionsinexpectantmanagement
AT kitagakihajime magneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofmassiveovarianedemainpregnancyutilityfordecisionsinexpectantmanagement