Cargando…

Ospemifene May Not Treat Vulvar Atrophy: A Report of Two Cases

INTRODUCTION: Ospemifene (Osphena, Shionogi Inc, Florham, NJ, USA) is an estrogen agonist and antagonist approved by the U.S. Federal Drug Administration for the treatment of “moderate to severe dyspareunia, a symptom of vulvar and vaginal atrophy, due to menopause.” Although published, peer-reviewe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldstein, Andrew T., King, Michelle A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27373143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2016.05.002
_version_ 1782450894131953664
author Goldstein, Andrew T.
King, Michelle A.
author_facet Goldstein, Andrew T.
King, Michelle A.
author_sort Goldstein, Andrew T.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ospemifene (Osphena, Shionogi Inc, Florham, NJ, USA) is an estrogen agonist and antagonist approved by the U.S. Federal Drug Administration for the treatment of “moderate to severe dyspareunia, a symptom of vulvar and vaginal atrophy, due to menopause.” Although published, peer-reviewed, placebo-controlled studies have shown objective improvement in dyspareunia and in vaginal atrophy, there are no published data that have assessed changes in vulvar atrophy after the use of ospemifene. AIM: To present two cases of women with severe vulvar atrophy that showed no improvement with the use of ospemifene. METHODS: A review of two recent cases of a clinic specializing in the treatment of vulvovaginal disorders was performed. Case 1 was a 53-year-old menopausal woman who presented with non-provoked vulvar and vaginal discomfort and introital dyspareunia. She had used ospemifene 60 mg/d for 1.5 years without improvement in her symptoms before presentation. Case 2 was a 57-year-old menopausal woman who also presented with non-provoked vulvar rawness, burning, irritation, vaginal dryness, and introital dyspareunia. She had started ospemifene 60 mg/d 1 year before presentation and reported mild improvement in her vaginal dryness but no improvement in her vulvar irritation or introital dyspareunia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in vulvar atrophy and introital dyspareunia. CONCLUSION: These cases highlight the need to perform additional clinical trials that specifically assess the efficacy of ospemifene for changes in vulvar atrophy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5005291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50052912016-09-09 Ospemifene May Not Treat Vulvar Atrophy: A Report of Two Cases Goldstein, Andrew T. King, Michelle A. Sex Med Case Report INTRODUCTION: Ospemifene (Osphena, Shionogi Inc, Florham, NJ, USA) is an estrogen agonist and antagonist approved by the U.S. Federal Drug Administration for the treatment of “moderate to severe dyspareunia, a symptom of vulvar and vaginal atrophy, due to menopause.” Although published, peer-reviewed, placebo-controlled studies have shown objective improvement in dyspareunia and in vaginal atrophy, there are no published data that have assessed changes in vulvar atrophy after the use of ospemifene. AIM: To present two cases of women with severe vulvar atrophy that showed no improvement with the use of ospemifene. METHODS: A review of two recent cases of a clinic specializing in the treatment of vulvovaginal disorders was performed. Case 1 was a 53-year-old menopausal woman who presented with non-provoked vulvar and vaginal discomfort and introital dyspareunia. She had used ospemifene 60 mg/d for 1.5 years without improvement in her symptoms before presentation. Case 2 was a 57-year-old menopausal woman who also presented with non-provoked vulvar rawness, burning, irritation, vaginal dryness, and introital dyspareunia. She had started ospemifene 60 mg/d 1 year before presentation and reported mild improvement in her vaginal dryness but no improvement in her vulvar irritation or introital dyspareunia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in vulvar atrophy and introital dyspareunia. CONCLUSION: These cases highlight the need to perform additional clinical trials that specifically assess the efficacy of ospemifene for changes in vulvar atrophy. Elsevier 2016-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5005291/ /pubmed/27373143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2016.05.002 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Goldstein, Andrew T.
King, Michelle A.
Ospemifene May Not Treat Vulvar Atrophy: A Report of Two Cases
title Ospemifene May Not Treat Vulvar Atrophy: A Report of Two Cases
title_full Ospemifene May Not Treat Vulvar Atrophy: A Report of Two Cases
title_fullStr Ospemifene May Not Treat Vulvar Atrophy: A Report of Two Cases
title_full_unstemmed Ospemifene May Not Treat Vulvar Atrophy: A Report of Two Cases
title_short Ospemifene May Not Treat Vulvar Atrophy: A Report of Two Cases
title_sort ospemifene may not treat vulvar atrophy: a report of two cases
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27373143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2016.05.002
work_keys_str_mv AT goldsteinandrewt ospemifenemaynottreatvulvaratrophyareportoftwocases
AT kingmichellea ospemifenemaynottreatvulvaratrophyareportoftwocases