Cargando…

Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether computed tomography (CT) and intraoral radiography are interchangeable for detecting signs of periodontitis and endodontic disease in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An agreement study was performed using 40 dogs that previously underwent intraoral radiography and CT dur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campbell, Robert D., Peralta, Santiago, Fiani, Nadine, Scrivani, Peter V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27630993
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00068
_version_ 1782450922485448704
author Campbell, Robert D.
Peralta, Santiago
Fiani, Nadine
Scrivani, Peter V.
author_facet Campbell, Robert D.
Peralta, Santiago
Fiani, Nadine
Scrivani, Peter V.
author_sort Campbell, Robert D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine whether computed tomography (CT) and intraoral radiography are interchangeable for detecting signs of periodontitis and endodontic disease in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An agreement study was performed using 40 dogs that previously underwent intraoral radiography and CT during the same anesthetic episode. Images of each tooth were examined by two blinded observers for signs of periodontitis and/or endodontic disease. Agreement between imaging modalities and between observers was assessed using the Kappa statistic. RESULTS: Agreement between modalities for detecting periodontitis in the maxillae ranged from poor to very good (κ 0.07–1.00) with 16/20 (80%) of the teeth having a score of moderate or better (κ ≥ 0.41). Agreement between modalities for detecting signs consistent with periodontitis in the mandibles ranged from poor to very good (κ 0.01–1.00) with 10/22 (45%) of the teeth having a score of good or better (κ ≥ 0.61); 50% of the disagreement was present in the incisors. Agreement between modalities for detecting signs consistent with endodontic disease in the whole mouth ranged from fair to very good (κ 0.21–1.00) with 30/42 (71%) of the teeth having a score of moderate or better (κ ≥ 0.41). Agreement between observers evaluating intraoral radiology ranged from poor to very good (κ 0.05–1) for detecting signs consistent with periodontitis and from fair to very good (κ 0.36–1) for detecting signs consistent with endodontic disease, in the whole mouth. Agreement between observers evaluating CT ranged from fair to very good (κ 0.35–1) for detecting signs consistent with periodontitis and from fair to very good (κ 0.36–1) for detecting signs consistent with endodontic disease, in the whole mouth. CONCLUSION: Performing both CT and intraoral radiography may be unnecessary to detect signs consistent with periodontitis and endodontic disease in dogs based on the amount of agreement between modalities and observers when CT images are acquired and reconstructed in 0.5 or 1 mm slice thickness, except for diagnosing periodontitis in the mandibular incisors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5005414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50054142016-09-14 Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study Campbell, Robert D. Peralta, Santiago Fiani, Nadine Scrivani, Peter V. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science OBJECTIVE: To determine whether computed tomography (CT) and intraoral radiography are interchangeable for detecting signs of periodontitis and endodontic disease in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An agreement study was performed using 40 dogs that previously underwent intraoral radiography and CT during the same anesthetic episode. Images of each tooth were examined by two blinded observers for signs of periodontitis and/or endodontic disease. Agreement between imaging modalities and between observers was assessed using the Kappa statistic. RESULTS: Agreement between modalities for detecting periodontitis in the maxillae ranged from poor to very good (κ 0.07–1.00) with 16/20 (80%) of the teeth having a score of moderate or better (κ ≥ 0.41). Agreement between modalities for detecting signs consistent with periodontitis in the mandibles ranged from poor to very good (κ 0.01–1.00) with 10/22 (45%) of the teeth having a score of good or better (κ ≥ 0.61); 50% of the disagreement was present in the incisors. Agreement between modalities for detecting signs consistent with endodontic disease in the whole mouth ranged from fair to very good (κ 0.21–1.00) with 30/42 (71%) of the teeth having a score of moderate or better (κ ≥ 0.41). Agreement between observers evaluating intraoral radiology ranged from poor to very good (κ 0.05–1) for detecting signs consistent with periodontitis and from fair to very good (κ 0.36–1) for detecting signs consistent with endodontic disease, in the whole mouth. Agreement between observers evaluating CT ranged from fair to very good (κ 0.35–1) for detecting signs consistent with periodontitis and from fair to very good (κ 0.36–1) for detecting signs consistent with endodontic disease, in the whole mouth. CONCLUSION: Performing both CT and intraoral radiography may be unnecessary to detect signs consistent with periodontitis and endodontic disease in dogs based on the amount of agreement between modalities and observers when CT images are acquired and reconstructed in 0.5 or 1 mm slice thickness, except for diagnosing periodontitis in the mandibular incisors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5005414/ /pubmed/27630993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00068 Text en Copyright © 2016 Campbell, Peralta, Fiani and Scrivani. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Campbell, Robert D.
Peralta, Santiago
Fiani, Nadine
Scrivani, Peter V.
Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study
title Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study
title_full Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study
title_fullStr Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study
title_short Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study
title_sort comparing intraoral radiography and computed tomography for detecting radiographic signs of periodontitis and endodontic disease in dogs: an agreement study
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27630993
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00068
work_keys_str_mv AT campbellrobertd comparingintraoralradiographyandcomputedtomographyfordetectingradiographicsignsofperiodontitisandendodonticdiseaseindogsanagreementstudy
AT peraltasantiago comparingintraoralradiographyandcomputedtomographyfordetectingradiographicsignsofperiodontitisandendodonticdiseaseindogsanagreementstudy
AT fianinadine comparingintraoralradiographyandcomputedtomographyfordetectingradiographicsignsofperiodontitisandendodonticdiseaseindogsanagreementstudy
AT scrivanipeterv comparingintraoralradiographyandcomputedtomographyfordetectingradiographicsignsofperiodontitisandendodonticdiseaseindogsanagreementstudy