Cargando…
Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether computed tomography (CT) and intraoral radiography are interchangeable for detecting signs of periodontitis and endodontic disease in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An agreement study was performed using 40 dogs that previously underwent intraoral radiography and CT dur...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27630993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00068 |
_version_ | 1782450922485448704 |
---|---|
author | Campbell, Robert D. Peralta, Santiago Fiani, Nadine Scrivani, Peter V. |
author_facet | Campbell, Robert D. Peralta, Santiago Fiani, Nadine Scrivani, Peter V. |
author_sort | Campbell, Robert D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine whether computed tomography (CT) and intraoral radiography are interchangeable for detecting signs of periodontitis and endodontic disease in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An agreement study was performed using 40 dogs that previously underwent intraoral radiography and CT during the same anesthetic episode. Images of each tooth were examined by two blinded observers for signs of periodontitis and/or endodontic disease. Agreement between imaging modalities and between observers was assessed using the Kappa statistic. RESULTS: Agreement between modalities for detecting periodontitis in the maxillae ranged from poor to very good (κ 0.07–1.00) with 16/20 (80%) of the teeth having a score of moderate or better (κ ≥ 0.41). Agreement between modalities for detecting signs consistent with periodontitis in the mandibles ranged from poor to very good (κ 0.01–1.00) with 10/22 (45%) of the teeth having a score of good or better (κ ≥ 0.61); 50% of the disagreement was present in the incisors. Agreement between modalities for detecting signs consistent with endodontic disease in the whole mouth ranged from fair to very good (κ 0.21–1.00) with 30/42 (71%) of the teeth having a score of moderate or better (κ ≥ 0.41). Agreement between observers evaluating intraoral radiology ranged from poor to very good (κ 0.05–1) for detecting signs consistent with periodontitis and from fair to very good (κ 0.36–1) for detecting signs consistent with endodontic disease, in the whole mouth. Agreement between observers evaluating CT ranged from fair to very good (κ 0.35–1) for detecting signs consistent with periodontitis and from fair to very good (κ 0.36–1) for detecting signs consistent with endodontic disease, in the whole mouth. CONCLUSION: Performing both CT and intraoral radiography may be unnecessary to detect signs consistent with periodontitis and endodontic disease in dogs based on the amount of agreement between modalities and observers when CT images are acquired and reconstructed in 0.5 or 1 mm slice thickness, except for diagnosing periodontitis in the mandibular incisors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5005414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50054142016-09-14 Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study Campbell, Robert D. Peralta, Santiago Fiani, Nadine Scrivani, Peter V. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science OBJECTIVE: To determine whether computed tomography (CT) and intraoral radiography are interchangeable for detecting signs of periodontitis and endodontic disease in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An agreement study was performed using 40 dogs that previously underwent intraoral radiography and CT during the same anesthetic episode. Images of each tooth were examined by two blinded observers for signs of periodontitis and/or endodontic disease. Agreement between imaging modalities and between observers was assessed using the Kappa statistic. RESULTS: Agreement between modalities for detecting periodontitis in the maxillae ranged from poor to very good (κ 0.07–1.00) with 16/20 (80%) of the teeth having a score of moderate or better (κ ≥ 0.41). Agreement between modalities for detecting signs consistent with periodontitis in the mandibles ranged from poor to very good (κ 0.01–1.00) with 10/22 (45%) of the teeth having a score of good or better (κ ≥ 0.61); 50% of the disagreement was present in the incisors. Agreement between modalities for detecting signs consistent with endodontic disease in the whole mouth ranged from fair to very good (κ 0.21–1.00) with 30/42 (71%) of the teeth having a score of moderate or better (κ ≥ 0.41). Agreement between observers evaluating intraoral radiology ranged from poor to very good (κ 0.05–1) for detecting signs consistent with periodontitis and from fair to very good (κ 0.36–1) for detecting signs consistent with endodontic disease, in the whole mouth. Agreement between observers evaluating CT ranged from fair to very good (κ 0.35–1) for detecting signs consistent with periodontitis and from fair to very good (κ 0.36–1) for detecting signs consistent with endodontic disease, in the whole mouth. CONCLUSION: Performing both CT and intraoral radiography may be unnecessary to detect signs consistent with periodontitis and endodontic disease in dogs based on the amount of agreement between modalities and observers when CT images are acquired and reconstructed in 0.5 or 1 mm slice thickness, except for diagnosing periodontitis in the mandibular incisors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5005414/ /pubmed/27630993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00068 Text en Copyright © 2016 Campbell, Peralta, Fiani and Scrivani. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Science Campbell, Robert D. Peralta, Santiago Fiani, Nadine Scrivani, Peter V. Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study |
title | Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study |
title_full | Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study |
title_fullStr | Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study |
title_short | Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study |
title_sort | comparing intraoral radiography and computed tomography for detecting radiographic signs of periodontitis and endodontic disease in dogs: an agreement study |
topic | Veterinary Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27630993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campbellrobertd comparingintraoralradiographyandcomputedtomographyfordetectingradiographicsignsofperiodontitisandendodonticdiseaseindogsanagreementstudy AT peraltasantiago comparingintraoralradiographyandcomputedtomographyfordetectingradiographicsignsofperiodontitisandendodonticdiseaseindogsanagreementstudy AT fianinadine comparingintraoralradiographyandcomputedtomographyfordetectingradiographicsignsofperiodontitisandendodonticdiseaseindogsanagreementstudy AT scrivanipeterv comparingintraoralradiographyandcomputedtomographyfordetectingradiographicsignsofperiodontitisandendodonticdiseaseindogsanagreementstudy |