Cargando…

Clinical Application of Revised Laboratory Classification Criteria for Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome: Is the Follow-Up Interval of 12 Weeks Instead of 6 Weeks Significantly Useful?

Background. According to revised classification criteria of true antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, at least one of three antiphospholipid antibodies should be present on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. However, it can be inconvenient to perform follow-up tests with interval of 12 we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Sang Hyuk, Jang, Seongsoo, Park, Chan-Jeoung, Chi, Hyun-Sook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27610369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2641526
_version_ 1782450940704456704
author Park, Sang Hyuk
Jang, Seongsoo
Park, Chan-Jeoung
Chi, Hyun-Sook
author_facet Park, Sang Hyuk
Jang, Seongsoo
Park, Chan-Jeoung
Chi, Hyun-Sook
author_sort Park, Sang Hyuk
collection PubMed
description Background. According to revised classification criteria of true antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, at least one of three antiphospholipid antibodies should be present on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. However, it can be inconvenient to perform follow-up tests with interval of 12 weeks. We investigated clinical application of follow-up tests with interval of 12 weeks. Method. Totals of 67, 199, and 332 patients tested positive initially for the lupus anticoagulants confirm, the anti-β (2) glycoprotein-I antibody, and the anti-cardiolipin antibody test, respectively, from Jan 2007 to Jul 2009. We investigated clinical symptoms of patients, follow-up interval, and results of each test. Results. Among patients with initial test positive, 1.5%–8.5% were subjected to follow-up tests at interval of more than 12 weeks. Among 25 patients with negative conversion in tests, patients with interval of more than 12 weeks showed clinical symptom positivity of 33.3%, which was higher than that of 12.5% with 6–12 weeks. Among 34 patients with persistent test positive, clinical symptoms positivity trended to be more evident in patients at interval of 6–12 weeks (47.4% versus 26.7%, P = 0.191) than more than 12 weeks. Conclusion. Less than 10% of patients with initial test positive had follow-up tests at interval of more than 12 weeks and the patients with persistent test positive at interval of more than 12 weeks showed trends toward having lower clinical symptoms than 6–12 weeks. More research is needed focused on the evidence that follow-up test at interval of more than 12 weeks should be performed instead of 6 weeks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5005572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50055722016-09-08 Clinical Application of Revised Laboratory Classification Criteria for Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome: Is the Follow-Up Interval of 12 Weeks Instead of 6 Weeks Significantly Useful? Park, Sang Hyuk Jang, Seongsoo Park, Chan-Jeoung Chi, Hyun-Sook Biomed Res Int Research Article Background. According to revised classification criteria of true antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, at least one of three antiphospholipid antibodies should be present on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. However, it can be inconvenient to perform follow-up tests with interval of 12 weeks. We investigated clinical application of follow-up tests with interval of 12 weeks. Method. Totals of 67, 199, and 332 patients tested positive initially for the lupus anticoagulants confirm, the anti-β (2) glycoprotein-I antibody, and the anti-cardiolipin antibody test, respectively, from Jan 2007 to Jul 2009. We investigated clinical symptoms of patients, follow-up interval, and results of each test. Results. Among patients with initial test positive, 1.5%–8.5% were subjected to follow-up tests at interval of more than 12 weeks. Among 25 patients with negative conversion in tests, patients with interval of more than 12 weeks showed clinical symptom positivity of 33.3%, which was higher than that of 12.5% with 6–12 weeks. Among 34 patients with persistent test positive, clinical symptoms positivity trended to be more evident in patients at interval of 6–12 weeks (47.4% versus 26.7%, P = 0.191) than more than 12 weeks. Conclusion. Less than 10% of patients with initial test positive had follow-up tests at interval of more than 12 weeks and the patients with persistent test positive at interval of more than 12 weeks showed trends toward having lower clinical symptoms than 6–12 weeks. More research is needed focused on the evidence that follow-up test at interval of more than 12 weeks should be performed instead of 6 weeks. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5005572/ /pubmed/27610369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2641526 Text en Copyright © 2016 Sang Hyuk Park et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Park, Sang Hyuk
Jang, Seongsoo
Park, Chan-Jeoung
Chi, Hyun-Sook
Clinical Application of Revised Laboratory Classification Criteria for Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome: Is the Follow-Up Interval of 12 Weeks Instead of 6 Weeks Significantly Useful?
title Clinical Application of Revised Laboratory Classification Criteria for Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome: Is the Follow-Up Interval of 12 Weeks Instead of 6 Weeks Significantly Useful?
title_full Clinical Application of Revised Laboratory Classification Criteria for Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome: Is the Follow-Up Interval of 12 Weeks Instead of 6 Weeks Significantly Useful?
title_fullStr Clinical Application of Revised Laboratory Classification Criteria for Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome: Is the Follow-Up Interval of 12 Weeks Instead of 6 Weeks Significantly Useful?
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Application of Revised Laboratory Classification Criteria for Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome: Is the Follow-Up Interval of 12 Weeks Instead of 6 Weeks Significantly Useful?
title_short Clinical Application of Revised Laboratory Classification Criteria for Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome: Is the Follow-Up Interval of 12 Weeks Instead of 6 Weeks Significantly Useful?
title_sort clinical application of revised laboratory classification criteria for antiphospholipid antibody syndrome: is the follow-up interval of 12 weeks instead of 6 weeks significantly useful?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27610369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2641526
work_keys_str_mv AT parksanghyuk clinicalapplicationofrevisedlaboratoryclassificationcriteriaforantiphospholipidantibodysyndromeisthefollowupintervalof12weeksinsteadof6weekssignificantlyuseful
AT jangseongsoo clinicalapplicationofrevisedlaboratoryclassificationcriteriaforantiphospholipidantibodysyndromeisthefollowupintervalof12weeksinsteadof6weekssignificantlyuseful
AT parkchanjeoung clinicalapplicationofrevisedlaboratoryclassificationcriteriaforantiphospholipidantibodysyndromeisthefollowupintervalof12weeksinsteadof6weekssignificantlyuseful
AT chihyunsook clinicalapplicationofrevisedlaboratoryclassificationcriteriaforantiphospholipidantibodysyndromeisthefollowupintervalof12weeksinsteadof6weekssignificantlyuseful