Cargando…

Firearms and the incidence of arrest among respondents to domestic violence restraining orders

BACKGROUND: Persons subject to domestic violence restraining orders (DVROs), known as respondents, are generally prohibited from possessing firearms. Efforts to enforce that prohibition have not been evaluated. The study objective was to determine whether associations exist between risk of incident...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wintemute, Garen J., Frattaroli, Shannon, Wright, Mona A., Claire, Barbara E., Vittes, Katherine A., Webster, Daniel W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-015-0047-2
_version_ 1782450945535246336
author Wintemute, Garen J.
Frattaroli, Shannon
Wright, Mona A.
Claire, Barbara E.
Vittes, Katherine A.
Webster, Daniel W.
author_facet Wintemute, Garen J.
Frattaroli, Shannon
Wright, Mona A.
Claire, Barbara E.
Vittes, Katherine A.
Webster, Daniel W.
author_sort Wintemute, Garen J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Persons subject to domestic violence restraining orders (DVROs), known as respondents, are generally prohibited from possessing firearms. Efforts to enforce that prohibition have not been evaluated. The study objective was to determine whether associations exist between risk of incident arrest among DVRO respondents and 1) respondents’ access to firearms, and 2) law enforcement recovery of firearms from respondents with access to them. METHODS: This was an observational study of 2,972 DVRO respondents in San Mateo County, California, 525 of whom were linked to firearms by standardized screening procedures. Enrollment occurred from May 2007 to June 2010 and follow-up through September 2010. Follow-up began when DVROs were served (or when issued if no date of service was available); median duration was 689 days. Principal exposures were access to firearms and, for subjects with access to firearms whose DVROs were served, contact by law enforcement personnel to recover those firearms. Main outcome measures were 1) incidence of arrest; 2) relative risk for arrest, adjusted for age, sex, prior criminal history, and duration of follow-up, assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Respondents linked to firearms were older than others and were more likely to have a history of prior arrest (49.7 % and 37.3 %, p < 0.0001). The incidence of arrest was 20.6 % for respondents linked to firearms and 21.1 % for others (p = 0.78). In multivariate models, access to firearms was associated with a modest, generally not statistically significant, decrease in risk for incident arrest. Among respondents who were linked to firearms and whose restraining orders were served, no statistically significant association existed between firearm recovery and risk for incident arrest. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study of DVRO respondents, findings are inconclusive for an association between access to firearms or firearm recovery and risk of incident arrest. Controlled trials on larger populations are indicated. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40621-015-0047-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5005597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50055972016-08-31 Firearms and the incidence of arrest among respondents to domestic violence restraining orders Wintemute, Garen J. Frattaroli, Shannon Wright, Mona A. Claire, Barbara E. Vittes, Katherine A. Webster, Daniel W. Inj Epidemiol Original Contribution BACKGROUND: Persons subject to domestic violence restraining orders (DVROs), known as respondents, are generally prohibited from possessing firearms. Efforts to enforce that prohibition have not been evaluated. The study objective was to determine whether associations exist between risk of incident arrest among DVRO respondents and 1) respondents’ access to firearms, and 2) law enforcement recovery of firearms from respondents with access to them. METHODS: This was an observational study of 2,972 DVRO respondents in San Mateo County, California, 525 of whom were linked to firearms by standardized screening procedures. Enrollment occurred from May 2007 to June 2010 and follow-up through September 2010. Follow-up began when DVROs were served (or when issued if no date of service was available); median duration was 689 days. Principal exposures were access to firearms and, for subjects with access to firearms whose DVROs were served, contact by law enforcement personnel to recover those firearms. Main outcome measures were 1) incidence of arrest; 2) relative risk for arrest, adjusted for age, sex, prior criminal history, and duration of follow-up, assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Respondents linked to firearms were older than others and were more likely to have a history of prior arrest (49.7 % and 37.3 %, p < 0.0001). The incidence of arrest was 20.6 % for respondents linked to firearms and 21.1 % for others (p = 0.78). In multivariate models, access to firearms was associated with a modest, generally not statistically significant, decrease in risk for incident arrest. Among respondents who were linked to firearms and whose restraining orders were served, no statistically significant association existed between firearm recovery and risk for incident arrest. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study of DVRO respondents, findings are inconclusive for an association between access to firearms or firearm recovery and risk of incident arrest. Controlled trials on larger populations are indicated. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40621-015-0047-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2015-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5005597/ /pubmed/27747746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-015-0047-2 Text en © Wintemute et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Wintemute, Garen J.
Frattaroli, Shannon
Wright, Mona A.
Claire, Barbara E.
Vittes, Katherine A.
Webster, Daniel W.
Firearms and the incidence of arrest among respondents to domestic violence restraining orders
title Firearms and the incidence of arrest among respondents to domestic violence restraining orders
title_full Firearms and the incidence of arrest among respondents to domestic violence restraining orders
title_fullStr Firearms and the incidence of arrest among respondents to domestic violence restraining orders
title_full_unstemmed Firearms and the incidence of arrest among respondents to domestic violence restraining orders
title_short Firearms and the incidence of arrest among respondents to domestic violence restraining orders
title_sort firearms and the incidence of arrest among respondents to domestic violence restraining orders
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-015-0047-2
work_keys_str_mv AT wintemutegarenj firearmsandtheincidenceofarrestamongrespondentstodomesticviolencerestrainingorders
AT frattarolishannon firearmsandtheincidenceofarrestamongrespondentstodomesticviolencerestrainingorders
AT wrightmonaa firearmsandtheincidenceofarrestamongrespondentstodomesticviolencerestrainingorders
AT clairebarbarae firearmsandtheincidenceofarrestamongrespondentstodomesticviolencerestrainingorders
AT vitteskatherinea firearmsandtheincidenceofarrestamongrespondentstodomesticviolencerestrainingorders
AT websterdanielw firearmsandtheincidenceofarrestamongrespondentstodomesticviolencerestrainingorders